.png?1683934188 "13 On Your Side")
The TV/radio contracts fund their salaries/compensation. They have some level of contractual obligation to answer questions.
Reply
The only athletes who should be required to speak to the media are professional athletes. However, even professional athletes should be afforded some grace for refusing such media obligations in certain circumstances.
Reply
Not necessary. In fact many times I would prefer they didn’t. I tune in to watch them play a game. Not hear their opinion on other matters. Media q&a used to be about the game performance. Now it’s predominantly about hot button issues. It’s why I tune out now. Just wanna see them play.
Reply
Your performance is not based on how you feel about hot issues. By speaking to the media usually only creates controversy.
Reply
Their endorsement deals will go down if they aren’t in front of the cameras with the logos on their clothing. If they don’t want to make more in endorsements that’s their decision.
Reply
Naomi Osaka's stock went through the roof, no press conference needed. Her brands are behind her, logos are all over their jerseys already while they play.
It should be played by no one has the courage to proceed for fear liability. Waiting for others to make the first positive step. Too bad.
Reply
because it has been cancelled again; but, if the US Open could play tennis with no fans in the seats, if the NFL can play football with no fans in the seats, if the NBA can play basketball with no fans in the seats, why couldn't the BNP do the same??????????
Reply
Debates and polls on Tennis from the SquareOffs community. Vote on real questions, see how the public is split, and back your side with a defense.
📱 Download the App: iOS
Support Publishers About Blog Shop Facebook Twitter Instagram Privacy Terms Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information Community Guidelines © 2025 SquareOffs Social Polling Platform
Asked by
