Should soda and candy be excluded from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program?

Should soda and candy be excluded from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program?

Of course!

11

It's not that simple.

23

Of course!

11 Comments
Will Mason
2
Will Mason

Since when are the answers to the question of the day not"yes" or "no"? Those are the options. And is is exactly that simple. The answers here are an attempt to skew the results. Pathetic.

Reply
Max DeYoung
Max DeYoung

The questions normally are biased to create confusion.

Wanda C Perry
1
Wanda C Perry

Neither are nutritional. Both lead to an increase in diabetes which is running rampant in our youth.

Reply
Fat Guy Outdoors
1
Fat Guy Outdoors

Oh my the oxygen thieves are going to be mad.

Reply
Eric Smith
1
Eric Smith

Why isn't it set up like the WIC program, where there are only specific approved food items. that can be purchased? It's not rocket science. I know it, you know it, and so does RFK Jr.

Reply
Max DeYoung
Max DeYoung

Because, they could not use them at the casinos if they did that.

Ethel Steele
1
Ethel Steele

Only healthy nutritious food should be able to buy with food stamps. Junk food should be abandoned. If junk food is bought with EBTstamps, it should be taxed. Chip, soda, and candy should be taxed. These foods are not nutrition and unhealthy

Reply
Max DeYoung
Max DeYoung

Governor JB Pritzker disagrees with that thought.

Toye Kauffman
1
Toye Kauffman

People are letting their kids grow up on junk. It's not healthy. Another of working people can't afford to buy their kids junk food. I got food stamps in the 70s. We couldn't buy junk food or soda. No prepared foods. No chicken legs or thighs because they cost more. I bought whole chickens an

Reply
Thenry Meier
1
Thenry Meier

These products are harmful for the body. Useless calories. Drink water, eat fruit. Your body will thank you.

Reply
Dave Ford
1
Dave Ford

This program is for "Supplemental Nutrition Assistance" Candy and can soda are not needed to supplement a diet in any circumstance.

Reply
Zaos Gonzolez
1
Zaos Gonzolez

In fact, sugar should be taxed as high as tobacco.

Reply
nathan bailey
1
nathan bailey

Yes, people are sick of the free handouts, while they have to suffer of go without.

Reply
Abigail Thomas
0
Abigail Thomas

Because I receive snap benefits and it makes it hard if they take that out then there taking away most of the food you get on stamps because of sugar is in most of the food.

Reply
Max DeYoung
Max DeYoung

Most food is not cokes and candy, anyway for most people.

It's not that simple.

13 Comments
Belinda Kitchen
3
Belinda Kitchen

If they that stupid then they need to crack down on people on SSI shouldn't be able to spend their checks on lottery tickets every month! Plain and simple.

Reply
Mzb Jackson
2
Mzb Jackson

Healthy foods are high price and if they want us to buy more healthy foods, then either need to lower the price for healthy foods or raise the price on food stamps

Reply
Jean Schooley
1
Jean Schooley

Because people could be diabetic

Reply
Amy Bane
0
Amy Bane

That is how I get my kids Easter candy, and Christmas Stocking candy, also ginger ale when they are sick.

Reply
Robin Chivers
0
Robin Chivers

No I don't think k it should be taken off .

Reply
Sharlene Williams
0
Sharlene Williams

There are people who need soda and candy due to low blood sugar. They should not have to suffer

Reply
Aleshiea Oliver
0
Aleshiea Oliver

ebt is suppose to be like cash.so...if someone paying cash never suppose to buy a candy bar??? also,if someone asks u for $ for gas and u let them have $ for gas,would u tell them they can only buy premium instead of reg??

Reply
James Hawthorne
0
James Hawthorne

No, because we have a craving for them, and it's something we need.

Reply
Mildred Roby
0
Mildred Roby

Some SNAP recipients are homeless and can't cook their own meals.

Reply
Rebecca Pena
0
Rebecca Pena

Because not only are you removing sports drinks but juices in general....also you are telling older adults who payed taxes for year who are now on ssi/ssdi and rely on food stamps that they can't get what they paid for before now just because they are old/disabled .

Reply
Jamal Bawadi
0
Jamal Bawadi

No, because the Diabetic people like myself needs sugar free candy and sugar free soda. I know the government wants everyone to be healthy but we have rights too on what foods to eat.

Reply
Max DeYoung
Max DeYoung

False. Sugar free candy is not food.

Vega Xavier
0
Vega Xavier

I'm not okay with this new thing of the president want to do. Sometimes we need a little sugar for our body etc...hope and pray that they not accepting this please

Reply
Max DeYoung
Max DeYoung

Fireball Cinnamon Whisky should also be prohibited.

Max DeYoung
Max DeYoung

Sugar is a basic food staple, and it is allowed. cokes, and candy is not. Get with the program.

Max DeYoung
0
Max DeYoung

Yes, they, and many other convenience foods should also be excluded. "It's not that simple", is an understatement.

Reply
Do you spend more hours a week watching traditional entertainment or user generated content?

Do you spend more hours a week watching traditional entertainment or user generated content?

Youtube/Twitch etc

5

Movies, television etc

1

Youtube/Twitch etc

5 Comments
Larry Ewart
0
Larry Ewart

Switched to YouTube from Cable like it so much better because of what we normally watch is programmed for us.

Reply
Adam Nixon
0
Adam Nixon

I'd say it's like 60/40 in favor of things like user generated content, but it has more to do with time than anything else. Due to things like work and chores, I just don't have time during the day for movies/TV. But for a few hours in the evening, I tend to watch more movies/TV, which I prefer.

Reply
Andrew Cozzini
0
Andrew Cozzini

This is one of those where I'm voting the honest truth, even though I'd prefer it be the other (while still making time for Geekvolution, of course). I think it's because of how casually I can spend hours on YouTube, as opposed to being intentional about catching up on content I intend to consume.

Reply
Mutale Mwananshiku
0
Mutale Mwananshiku

They are movies and shows i want to watch but am more focused on youtube.

Reply

Movies, television etc

1 Comment
ANY Triangle
0
ANY Triangle

movies and tels are nostalgic

Reply
Is someone who lets their pet off-leash in restricted areas considered a 'bad pet owner?'
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
808 Votes

Is someone who lets their pet off-leash in restricted areas considered a 'bad pet owner?'

Yes

6

No

5

Yes

6 Comments
Kristi Murdock
1
Kristi Murdock

Even a friendly dog with excellent recall can cause real problems for the owner walking their reactive dog on leash; a dog running free is highly exciting to other dogs; it's not fair for the owner of the reactive dog to have to deal with that overstimulation in a "leash only" area.

Reply
robert weber
robert weber

I recently I commented that it is not fair. But your comment makes me feel incorrect. I have had a reactive dog before and I feel that your comment is valid.

Kati Magana
0
Kati Magana

If it is a law and you break it regardless of what it refers to that is breaking the law- which by definition is criminal. If you put your pet in a situation that is unsafe that is your responsibility and ergo you are a bad pet owner. Pets are like our kids, it's our job to keep them safe.

Reply
Kim Ritchie
0
Kim Ritchie

yes because they are putting their dog as well as people with leashed pets at risk. Not all dogs like other dogs and not all people are comfortable with strange dogs running up to them.

Reply
Ann Thomas
0
Ann Thomas

There are laws and rules for a reason. No one should think that laws and rules don't apply to them. If they want their dog off leash then go out in the woods where no one else is or to a fenced dog park.

Reply
Deborah Albright
0
Deborah Albright

BECAUSE most dog owners that do this have zero respect for others or property.. NEVER pick up poop and feel entitled

Reply
Nic Secor
0
Nic Secor

There are leash laws for good reason. On a side note Bend Parks and Recreation need to put up signs at dog parks reminding owners that they are liable for damages their dogs cause to other dogs or humans under Oregon law. Bend PD treat dog parks like they are outside of their jurisdiction.

Reply

No

4 Comments
Amanda Jones
1
Amanda Jones

A bad dog owner is someone who is not able to care of the animal or mistreats the animal. The person is just not considerate of others and will break the law for whatever reason they may have. *if you have an aggressive dog it is the OWNERS responsibility to keep the dog under control anywhere

Reply
Payton Dixson
1
Payton Dixson

There are many factors, if your dog has great recall and obeys to stay in a heal being off leash is fine as the dog is still in verbal control. Dogs that do not listen should not be off leash.

Reply
k san
0
k san

No, that's too big a generalization. However, those owners should never let their pet off-leash in those areas.

Reply
robert weber
0
robert weber

Maybe there pet is trusted and not reactive. Why does a none relative happy pet need to be restricted?

Reply
Who to Follow
Andu

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT