Should soda and candy be excluded from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program?

Should soda and candy be excluded from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program?

Of course!

12

It's not that simple.

23

Of course!

12 Comments
Will Mason
2
Will Mason

Since when are the answers to the question of the day not"yes" or "no"? Those are the options. And is is exactly that simple. The answers here are an attempt to skew the results. Pathetic.

Reply
Max DeYoung
Max DeYoung

The questions normally are biased to create confusion.

Wanda C Perry
1
Wanda C Perry

Neither are nutritional. Both lead to an increase in diabetes which is running rampant in our youth.

Reply
Fat Guy Outdoors
1
Fat Guy Outdoors

Oh my the oxygen thieves are going to be mad.

Reply
Eric Smith
1
Eric Smith

Why isn't it set up like the WIC program, where there are only specific approved food items. that can be purchased? It's not rocket science. I know it, you know it, and so does RFK Jr.

Reply
Max DeYoung
Max DeYoung

Because, they could not use them at the casinos if they did that.

Ethel Steele
1
Ethel Steele

Only healthy nutritious food should be able to buy with food stamps. Junk food should be abandoned. If junk food is bought with EBTstamps, it should be taxed. Chip, soda, and candy should be taxed. These foods are not nutrition and unhealthy

Reply
Max DeYoung
Max DeYoung

Governor JB Pritzker disagrees with that thought.

Toye Kauffman
1
Toye Kauffman

People are letting their kids grow up on junk. It's not healthy. Another of working people can't afford to buy their kids junk food. I got food stamps in the 70s. We couldn't buy junk food or soda. No prepared foods. No chicken legs or thighs because they cost more. I bought whole chickens an

Reply
Thenry Meier
1
Thenry Meier

These products are harmful for the body. Useless calories. Drink water, eat fruit. Your body will thank you.

Reply
Dave Ford
1
Dave Ford

This program is for "Supplemental Nutrition Assistance" Candy and can soda are not needed to supplement a diet in any circumstance.

Reply
Zaos Gonzolez
1
Zaos Gonzolez

In fact, sugar should be taxed as high as tobacco.

Reply
nathan bailey
1
nathan bailey

Yes, people are sick of the free handouts, while they have to suffer of go without.

Reply
Teresa Twenter
0
Teresa Twenter

People should get a job !!! It's that simple . But many want to start out at the top or think they are to good to flip burgers . Would rather sit on ass and take handout .

Reply
Abigail Thomas
0
Abigail Thomas

Because I receive snap benefits and it makes it hard if they take that out then there taking away most of the food you get on stamps because of sugar is in most of the food.

Reply
Max DeYoung
Max DeYoung

Most food is not cokes and candy, anyway for most people.

It's not that simple.

13 Comments
Belinda Kitchen
3
Belinda Kitchen

If they that stupid then they need to crack down on people on SSI shouldn't be able to spend their checks on lottery tickets every month! Plain and simple.

Reply
Mzb Jackson
2
Mzb Jackson

Healthy foods are high price and if they want us to buy more healthy foods, then either need to lower the price for healthy foods or raise the price on food stamps

Reply
Jean Schooley
1
Jean Schooley

Because people could be diabetic

Reply
Amy Bane
0
Amy Bane

That is how I get my kids Easter candy, and Christmas Stocking candy, also ginger ale when they are sick.

Reply
Robin Chivers
0
Robin Chivers

No I don't think k it should be taken off .

Reply
Sharlene Williams
0
Sharlene Williams

There are people who need soda and candy due to low blood sugar. They should not have to suffer

Reply
Aleshiea Oliver
0
Aleshiea Oliver

ebt is suppose to be like cash.so...if someone paying cash never suppose to buy a candy bar??? also,if someone asks u for $ for gas and u let them have $ for gas,would u tell them they can only buy premium instead of reg??

Reply
James Hawthorne
0
James Hawthorne

No, because we have a craving for them, and it's something we need.

Reply
Mildred Roby
0
Mildred Roby

Some SNAP recipients are homeless and can't cook their own meals.

Reply
Rebecca Pena
0
Rebecca Pena

Because not only are you removing sports drinks but juices in general....also you are telling older adults who payed taxes for year who are now on ssi/ssdi and rely on food stamps that they can't get what they paid for before now just because they are old/disabled .

Reply
Jamal Bawadi
0
Jamal Bawadi

No, because the Diabetic people like myself needs sugar free candy and sugar free soda. I know the government wants everyone to be healthy but we have rights too on what foods to eat.

Reply
Max DeYoung
Max DeYoung

False. Sugar free candy is not food.

Vega Xavier
0
Vega Xavier

I'm not okay with this new thing of the president want to do. Sometimes we need a little sugar for our body etc...hope and pray that they not accepting this please

Reply
Max DeYoung
Max DeYoung

Fireball Cinnamon Whisky should also be prohibited.

Max DeYoung
Max DeYoung

Sugar is a basic food staple, and it is allowed. cokes, and candy is not. Get with the program.

Max DeYoung
0
Max DeYoung

Yes, they, and many other convenience foods should also be excluded. "It's not that simple", is an understatement.

Reply
Should e-bikes be allowed on forest trails?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
2,293 Votes

Should e-bikes be allowed on forest trails?

Yes

17

No

20

Yes

11 Comments
MATT FALKENSTEIN DDS
2
MATT FALKENSTEIN DDS

Anyone who has pedaled a Class 1 ebike (the ONLY type in contention) quickly realizes two things: first, they don't go any faster than a meat-motor bike and second, they REQUIRE work from the rider.

Reply
Todd Brown
2
Todd Brown

Yes,,Ebikes should be allowed on trails! Why wouldn't they be allowed? Mine has "Pedal Assist" which I am peddling at all times.

Reply
Carl England
2
Carl England

Ya’ll need to understand. These are not the kids you see flying around town on throttle e-bikes. Mountain E bikes are quite expensive and are designed for mountain biking and for serious mountain bikers. Most of the people you will see on them initially will be people with disabilities.

Reply
Dave Custer
2
Dave Custer

Let people ride whatever they want

Reply
💛🖤 RAG 💛🖤
2
💛🖤 RAG 💛🖤

Class 1 electric assist bikes should not be discriminated against, they are capped at a max of 20mph, provide assistance to the people who for whatever reason need assistance to tackle parts of the trails and they won't do any damage to the trails. Other national forests provide access already!

Reply
Linda C May
2
Linda C May

I am 66 years old. I ride a ebike so I can get out on the trails & forests I love. Otherwise I couldn't. Not everyone is a speed junkie. There are many bike riders that speed and do damage to the land. Ebikes are here to stay. Stop penalizing them.

Reply
Loretta Ryll
1
Loretta Ryll

For many who have invisible disabilities, the Class I pedal-assisted e-mountain bikes, make it possible for these individuals to enjoy our forest single-track trails. They want to stay healthy and active. Class I ebikes are NOT the throttled ebikes we see zooming around the streets of Bend.

Reply
Tammie Bendele
0
Tammie Bendele

The once beautiful city of Portland has been destroyed by liberal government! It’s time to turn the city back into a safe place to live. Governor Kotek will not stop the destruction. Instead she allows the destruction to continue under pretense of freedom of speech. She needs to be recalled!!!

Reply
Jim Petsche
0
Jim Petsche

They don't put any more damage to the trails than regular bikes and in many cases less. Generally they are ridden by older riders who go slower

Reply
Duane Wyman
0
Duane Wyman

Not all trails are suitable or compatible for e-bikes and other users. What is next, e-bikes on the PCT or ridden to the summit Of South Sister...?

Reply
Erik Thompson
0
Erik Thompson

I am 62 and my e mtn bike allows me to ride trails I'd otherwise never ride.

Reply

No

20 Comments
Peter McGann
4
Peter McGann

They are ridden frequently by inexperienced people. They have too much speed when approaching hikers. Many cannot stop adequately. Their silence is dangerous when approaching from behind. There should be drivers license requirements. Peter SNRA/ Ketchum pdmcgann@gmail.com

Reply
True Omen
3
True Omen

E bike owners are mad they bought into the hype before reading the rules. If it has a motor it is a motor bike. Not my fault you are lazy. Mtb'ing is hard. It is not for everyone.

Reply
island er
3
island er

Ebikes are motorized. They can already access forest roads and ohv trails. They are a hazard to mtbers on single track.

Reply
Frank Dietsch
3
Frank Dietsch

They are motorized. I have been sprayed by dirt and gravel when the went flying by me at great speed and have seen them pop wheelies going up the steep trail. Motorized bikes belong on the many OHV trails.

Reply
Dianne Price
CB
CB

Gatekeeping our public lands, eh? Pathetic.

Rick Allen
2
Rick Allen

It is a motorized Vehicle period.

Reply
Rob Pempin
2
Rob Pempin

E-bikers need do to do their own footwork to obtain land for E-bike trails just as we have done for Mtn bikes for years now. The excessive speeds especially climbing & entitlement is out of control. Stop taking the soul out of MTB biking, do the footwork & obtain the land.

Reply
Dennis Bennett
2
Dennis Bennett

There are many ways to hack these ebikes and make them go over 20mph. https://www.ebicycles.com/how-to-make-your-ebike-faster/ Also, there will be no one to police the trails to make sure that on class 1 bikes are out there. For example, people illegally riding the trails with ebikes now.

Reply
Mark Davis
2
Mark Davis

More power and speed will cause greater damage to the trails and create a dangerous situation for all users.

Reply
Loretta Ryll
Loretta Ryll

I encourage you and many others to rent a Class I pedal-assist emountain bike and then form an informed opinion. These bikes are not throttled, can't go above 20 mph, are not noisy and provide those with invisible handicaps some assistance so they can enjoy the thrill of biking our forested trails.

Todd Miller
2
Todd Miller

It's a motorcycle with peddles. Internal combustion engine motorcycles aren't allowed either for the same good reason, erosion and safety of the mixed speed of riders and hikers.

Reply
💛🖤 RAG 💛🖤
💛🖤 RAG 💛🖤

That's a lie, they have no throttle and are capped at a 20 mph no matter how hard you peddle! BTW damage to the trails is done by the speed demons on mountain bikes!!

Loretta Ryll
Loretta Ryll

Class I pedal-assist emountain bikes are not throttled so no internal combustion, they are capped at 20 mph. No pedaling =equals NO power. I encourage you to Google the descriptions of the various classes of ebikes.

Kimmy Wasatch
1
Kimmy Wasatch

There are more than enough parks and trails in and around Bend for ebikes. We do not need them in our forests. Forests are abused enough already and need to be reserved as forests.

Reply
James Rosser
1
James Rosser

Because mountain biking is for exercise not tourism. There are plenty of other places to ride e-bikes.

Reply
Geoff Freeland
1
Geoff Freeland

As ebikes get more powerful, they create trail damage. Might as well allow motorcycles if you're gonna allow ebikes.

Reply
CB
CB

You obviously know nothing about class 1 ebikes and are just regurgitating nonsense you heard from an unreliable source.

Judith Van Gilder
1
Judith Van Gilder

These trails are mean for people who are out EXERCISING. There are plenty of FS roads where people with e-bikes can ride. Also available are plenty of dirt bike trails. Please leave these trails to those of us who are enjoying the peace and quiet.

Reply
CB
CB

Judith, please educate yourself before commenting. Class 1 ebikes are pedal assist, they aren't tearing up the trails any more than a regular mountain bike. They help people with disabilities and the older generation enjoy the great outdoors. Stop gatekeeping our public lands.

Lexus Maximus
0
Lexus Maximus

They travel too fast and tend to have an attitude that they own the trail. I have not only seen electric bikes but other bikes in the wilderness areas already and my experience has not been a positive one with them.

Reply
Ed Drahos
0
Ed Drahos

Not a fan of more trash and junk strone all over national forest. There's a serious problem with waste as is, without making the problem worse.

Reply
James Rosser
0
James Rosser

This misses the point of physical training which is to start exercising on easier trails and slowly build up to more challenging trails as one gets stronger. E-bikes are just a shortcut allowing one to jump to the more challenging trails without the proper training. People just want a magic pill.

Reply
Gary Kayser
0
Gary Kayser

E-bike are indeed motorized. Cause more erosion to the trials. E-bikes are a death sentence to horseback riders.

Reply
Jo Kendrick
0
Jo Kendrick

They run over people and scare pets.

Reply
Gerald Smith
0
Gerald Smith

They are wrecks waiting to happen with no enforcement of any of the rules. They should be required to follow the same rules as motorcycles. That's what they are.

Reply
Who do you blame for the federal government shutdown?

Who do you blame for the federal government shutdown?

Democrats

13

Republicans

4

Democrats

5 Comments
Latterdaysaint
1
Latterdaysaint

Democrats would rather support illegals then American citizens

Reply
Wendy glassburn
1
Wendy glassburn

The democrats want to add to the budget. It’s a CR, you don’t add to it. You open the government and then negotiate the budget.

Reply
Steve Baumann
1
Steve Baumann

This is the actual correct answer.

Reply
Steve Baumann
Steve Baumann

I'd like to see how many of the democratic votes came from bots

Steve Baumann
Steve Baumann

Democrats are insisting on concessions related to health care policy (specifically extending Affordable Care Act health insurance subsidies) to reopen the government. Republicans argue for a "clean" funding bill without these policy changes.

Max
1
Max

It's beautiful. Trump is getting rid of the fake workers Biden hired, and AOC will Primary Schumer. Winner winner, chicken dinner.

Reply
Max
Max

As every 8th grade Civics student knows, it takes 60 votes to end the Schumer Shutdown. Since we only have 53 Republicans, we must have a handful of Senate Democrats

Max
Max

"No one is so blind as one who will not see" means that a person who is unwilling to accept the truth is more difficult to convince than someone who is physically blind.

Max
Max

Trump is ending wars, getting hostages released, after nearly 2 years, while Schumer is holding the US taxpayers hostage, for free medical care for illegal aliens, while our own citizens have to pay for medical care.

Toasty
0
Toasty

Wish I could vote for both. This shutdown is a game both sides are playing. I want to roll up a newspaper and smack 'em both.

Reply

Republicans

4 Comments
MidMoGenX
1
MidMoGenX

Republicans could easily say yes to extending subsidies for Americans and no to the other provisions. If Dems say “no” then it’s on them. Not much compromising is going on.

Reply
Steve Baumann
Steve Baumann

Democrats are insisting on concessions related to health care policy (specifically extending Affordable Care Act health insurance subsidies) to reopen the government. Republicans argue for a "clean" funding bill without these policy changes. CLEAN FUNDING BILL WITHOUT PORK

Steve Baumann
Steve Baumann

Hand up not hand out.

Kathryn Stayton
0
Kathryn Stayton

They are in charge. Can’t reopen when the House is on a 6 week vacation out of the last 2 months. They won’t come to work. Only a fool could not understand this

Reply
Novel Pairings
0
Novel Pairings

They control the Presidency, Senate and House, and are holding up a budget that would increase healthcare premiums three-fold for millions of Americans to give the rich tax write-offs. This is all Republican.

Reply
Scott Kramer
0
Scott Kramer

I don't believe that the ACA causes a significant amount of money to go to healthcare for illegal immigrants

Reply
Max
Max

"No one is so blind as one who will not see" means that a person who is unwilling to accept the truth is more difficult to convince than someone who is physically blind....

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT