Do you think the Big 10 should make any conference alignment changes in response to the SEC moves?

Do you think the Big 10 should make any conference alignment changes in response to the SEC moves?

No hurry, just select high quality

3

Go big because the SEC is coming

12

No hurry, just select high quality

3 Comments
Robert Lloyd
1
Robert Lloyd

Make Barry Alvarez the Big 10 commissioner and surround him with good advisors and go from there. We can't lose with that. Don't strike out and add things without a top team in place to make the decisions.

Reply
Brandon Rolf
0
Brandon Rolf

Kansas and Iowa State...Kansas obviously strong in basketball and has numerous other athletic programs. Iowa State strong wrestling and doesn't have baseball therefore we back to an even amount of teams. Kick Purdue over to the east to be with Indiana full time.

Reply
Douglas Norman
0
Douglas Norman

If B1G can get good traditional football powers, then they should do it. I’m talking teams I with the academic standard they require and are good too. I’d even expand out to PAC12 and down to ACC. See if Notre Dame would reconsider. USC? UCLA, Stanford?

Reply

Go big because the SEC is coming

11 Comments
Steve Sexton
3
Steve Sexton

The Big 10 conference officials would be fools to assume the SEC has not already at least contacted Ohio State, Penn State and Michigan regarding joining. The only way to remain a viable conference long-term is to form a super conference to match the SEC's intentions. Strike from a position of power

Reply
Nick Tempo
Nick Tempo

It will be a cold day in hell before OSU and Michigan or any of the other original 10 depart for the SEC. I don't know what the loyalties are of the newer members, but I'm going to guess that they are also happy where they are as long as the money continues to flow.

James Key
2
James Key

Go baby go!!!!

Reply
Randy Weitzenkamp
1
Randy Weitzenkamp

Things appear to be moving fast and we certainly don't want to be on the outside looking in.

Reply
David Jorgensen
1
David Jorgensen

I say go to 20 teams by adding WA*, OR*, USC*, TCU, ASU, and either Okie St or CO*. Go two 10 team divisions playing round robin and two cross-over (11 total conference games) and 1 non-con. Just don't leave ourselves out of the south market! I don't acre about the AAU*.

Reply
G N
1
G N

you snooze you loose

Reply
Toby Leach
0
Toby Leach

We can enhance the conference by adding quality programs. Would love to see ND, KU, and say bye to Rutgers and Maryland. Add a couple other teams that make sense too.

Reply
Doug Miller
0
Doug Miller

Better make the move now.

Reply
Nick Tempo
0
Nick Tempo

Texas and Oklahoma maybe big name brands, but I don't think Texas is as big of a deal as they seem to think they are. Seriously, what has Texas ever done? They are an underachiever and they will continue to underachieve in the SEC. As for Oklahoma? I see them as being another LSU.

Reply
Ron Joseph
0
Ron Joseph

Yes, we have to go big - Go after the top 6 Pac 12 schools I can live wt Kansas if the Big 10 can convinced Norte Dame to join. If not, go after the Pac 12. Then let the orphan 8 & rest of Pac 12 form a conference

Reply
Mike Di Mauro
0
Mike Di Mauro

Merge the PAC, grab IA ST, Kan, Kan ST TX T from the Big 12, raid the ACC of Clemson and Notre Dame. You then have 32 teams. Use the NFL model You can beat the SEC and then have in one division a Penn St vs Clemson, a Notre Dame vs Ohio St, Oregon vs Michigan.

Reply
Travis Kreifels
0
Travis Kreifels

I like the idea of adding the 9 AAU schools: Arizona, UCLA, USC, Cal, Stanford, Oregon, Washington, Utah and Colorado. I'd then add 1 more team (ND??). 6 4 team pods. play your pod and two other pods for 11 games plus one non conference. should play all teams twice in 5 years.

Reply
Would you rather see Tim Burton make a new Batman movie or Sam Raimi make a new Spider-Man movie?

Would you rather see Tim Burton make a new Batman movie or Sam Raimi make a new Spider-Man movie?

Burton Batman

0

Raimi Spider-Man

11

Burton Batman

0 Comment
No one has commented yet

Raimi Spider-Man

11 Comments
Benjamin Szczegolski-Jacobs
1
Benjamin Szczegolski-Jacobs

I like Raimi as a director more and frankly seeing the first draught of the 89 script makes me like Burton even less. Havent ever really loved 89 as much as others to begin with, sonce I didnt grow up with it.

Reply
Mutale Mwananshiku
1
Mutale Mwananshiku

Raimi cause at least he loves spider-man and would try to make a character driven story about peter , whereas burton doesnt care for batman and another batman film by him would be all visuals and not a character driven story about batman.

Reply
Andrew Cozzini
1
Andrew Cozzini

Burton Batman, while still a notable and fondly remembered version, is (imo) seeming less influential and culturally relevant the more years that have passed since its release. Conversely, Sam Raimi's Spider-Man seems way more influential again, and is, for me, the more definitive take of the two!

Reply
Spencer Nielsen
1
Spencer Nielsen

Easy! Burton has yet to make a good Batman movie, Raimi made two great films with Spider-Man.

Reply
rockmanlp
0
rockmanlp

Burton is much less talented

Reply
Smol-Vampire
0
Smol-Vampire

I want Raimi to redeem himself for the biggest let down

Reply
Jay-El Lewis
0
Jay-El Lewis

While I enjoyed both Sam just had more films, Norton only had that one Batman film with Michael Keaton

Reply
Robert Wild
0
Robert Wild

The Raimi Spider-man films feel like an overarching story without a satisfying ending. I just have more nostalgia for Raimi Spider-man. Literally nothing would make me happier than hearing that elfman spider-man score over the opening credits of a new Raimi Spider-man movie one more time.

Reply
Chewbaacca's Lover
0
Chewbaacca's Lover

It would be a harder choice if it was the Keaton universe without Burton, even than I might have to go with Spider Man, Raimi is the easy choice with Burton the way he is now.

Reply
SpedeVesku
0
SpedeVesku

Burton's best days are behind him and even during those he wasn't perfect. Raimi still seems to "got it", even if I haven't loved all of his more recent work either. Plus, his Spider-Man movies ended on a worse note than Burton's Batmans, so there's a bigger need for redemption.

Reply
Jedi Knight
0
Jedi Knight

Now I assume that both Tim Burton and Sam Raimi are very different people than when they left their projects, but since there's been less time in between 2007 and now than there is 1992 and now, I assume that Raimi has retained more of his sensibilities that made his version work.

Reply
Should President Trump continue to pursue a United States takeover of Greenland?

Should President Trump continue to pursue a United States takeover of Greenland?

Yes

10

No

7

Yes

3 Comments
Vanessa Vaughan
0
Vanessa Vaughan

I ignored it just like Republican lawmakers ignore takkng a bigger stance on control on school shootings. All they do is give meaningless mouth service the whole time pocketing money from NRA lobbyists. I don't want to take anyone's guns from them, but our children should feel safe.

Reply
Felicia Megan
0
Felicia Megan

He needs to chill.

Reply
Max
0
Max

Trump got the deal today January 21st.. Trump helps Americans again. Daily.

Reply
Max
Max

Fred, keep reading CNN. LOL

Fred
Fred

There are two ways to be fooled: One is to believe what isn't true, and the other is to refuse to believe what is true. ― Soren Kierkegaard

No

6 Comments
Nancy Sims-VanBuren
1
Nancy Sims-VanBuren

He has us at odds with our allies, our adversaries and within our own nation due to the extreme violence with the ICE issue... civil unrest...

Reply
Max
Max

Wrong again.

Steven Watson
1
Steven Watson

He is completely insane. He and his cabinet want the natural resources, like Venezuela oil!!!

Reply
Max
Max

Wrong again.

Bryan Jones
1
Bryan Jones

We already have a military presence in Greenland. Denmark is a NATO ally. Trump should NOT be threatening the European balance or the time-tested established order. This has ramifications far beyond Trump's ego.

Reply
Max
Max

Wrong again.

0571953
1
0571953

US should not invade other countries. Never Greenland or Venezuela. This is Trump enriching himself. Dangerous and destroying US reputation on human rights.

Reply
Max
Max

He didn't invade them.

Denzel McVeigh
1
Denzel McVeigh

You don't own this country and you can't own Greenland matter of fact go away you prick

Reply
Max
Max

Wrong again.

Kevin Blount
1
Kevin Blount

We have existing agreements with Greenland and Denmark regarding military bases. We should expand on that, rather than threaten to take the entire country by force 'if necessary'

Reply
Max
Max

Trump made a deal that everyone loves. All over the EU.

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT