Do you think a home energy score should be mandatory to sell a house?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
886 Votes

Do you think a home energy score should be mandatory to sell a house?

Yes

0

No

10

Yes

0 Comment
No one has commented yet

No

7 Comments
Thomas K. Marple
1
Thomas K. Marple

It would just create another bureaucratic requirement for residents at the expense of homeowners and would not accomplish anything. Prospective buyers can already higher a home inspector to evaluate a home before they purchase. the City Council should BUTT OUT!

Reply
Kathleen Cleavenger
1
Kathleen Cleavenger

Another hidden tax!

Reply
Sussie Due
0
Sussie Due

That should be up to the buyer to do that NOT the seller.

Reply
Paul Bianchina
0
Paul Bianchina

Another perfect example of the hypocrisy of the current city council, who seems determined to ruin Bend. They whine and cry about affordable housing, then add more red tape to make houses more expensive. It's up to a buyer to understand the home they're buying, not the government!!

Reply
Native Oregonian
0
Native Oregonian

It only adds to the cost of buying an already over priced home. If buyers want to know what an energy score is, they can pay for an energy survey on their own when buying the house, at their own expense. This council needs to start listening to what their constituents want, and stop wasting time.

Reply
Neil Mackey
0
Neil Mackey

Just another example of government sticking their nose into private citizens' personal affairs! If a potential buyer and seller want to work that issue out as part of a (potential) sale, that should be THEIR choice, not a mandate by the City of Bend....

Reply
Gabe West
0
Gabe West

Another hidden tax

Reply
Gabe West
Gabe West

Insurance pays for my wheelchair

Would you take a pay cut for more sleep?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
734 Votes

Would you take a pay cut for more sleep?

Yes, for my health!

1

No way!!

4

Yes, for my health!

1 Comment
Libby Christian
0
Libby Christian

Cuz I love to sleep and it's healthy

Reply

No way!!

4 Comments
Dan Taylor
0
Dan Taylor

Under 30 years old, it comes built in

Reply
Janine Dobkins Hansen
0
Janine Dobkins Hansen

Doesn’t matter anyway I’m still not going to sleep enough

Reply
Sam Ackerman
0
Sam Ackerman

I learned a job skill that pay's very well and do not need to work more then 40 hours a week. Shot I dont even need to work the whole year.

Reply
Should taxpayer money go towards the White House ballroom?

Should taxpayer money go towards the White House ballroom?

Yes

0

No

4

Yes

0 Comment
No one has commented yet

No

4 Comments
Patty Contreras
0
Patty Contreras

Big waste of money on a vanity project that does not benefit Americans. Money can be better spent on Healthcare, the homeless, housing, daycare, education..I could go on and on. This president is the biggest conman and grifter ever in history. He has already wasted & stolen billions of dollars.

Reply
Linda Rothrock Jurus
0
Linda Rothrock Jurus

When it proposed Trump said it was being built by private donors! Now Liar in Chief wants taxpayers to foot bill... Just another of many lies!

Reply
L. Maldonado
0
L. Maldonado

Illegal. No Congressional permission. No taxpayer approval. Unneeded. No his personal residence. WH belongs to the people, not the Kremlin look-a-like. Trump is not POTUS; he was constitutionally banned from office. He DID NOT WIN, because the Constitution says so. (14thA, section 3.)

Reply
Ralph Stewart
0
Ralph Stewart

The average American is being hurt by the rising gas and grocery prices and shouldn’t be expected to pay for an extravagant ballroom. The US doesn’t need to be spending money on luxuries like a ballroom, when it can’t pay its 28 TRILLION DOLLARS debt. The country is on the verge of bankruptcy!

Reply

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT