Policy SquareOffs

32%
Hillary

1

68%
Trump WINNER

22

32%
Hillary

1 Comment
Derek Wildstar
6
Derek Wildstar

I trust Hillary because she will be most predictable. Predictably bad, predictably a warmonger.

Reply

68%
Trump

21 Comments
Patrick Henningsen
12
Patrick Henningsen

Hillary Clinton has already shown us her foreign policy work - in Libya and in Syria. Both are disasters responsible for hundreds of thousands dead. One can only image what the human cost would be if she were to seize power for 4, or even 8 years.

Reply
Nicholas Fowler
Nicholas Fowler

let us hope the FBI white hats make their move for maybe even elements of the military, maybe General Dunfords men?? I think she should be one of the first to sample the glories of the FEMA holiday camp !!!

Ryan Swafford
8
Ryan Swafford

Strong business ties, and a life of negotiation makes him a natural "mover and shaker" also I think his background will be useful to see the economic and political aspects of a situation or sensitive event.

Reply
Noeline Clayfield
6
Noeline Clayfield

MSM giving Trump bad coverage and pushing Clinton. MSM journalists are pathetic! If you dig a little deeper on Trump he has a fairly good grasp on things that is not neocon. The US corporate voting system is broke.

Reply
bvgp
6
bvgp

Anyone but Killary. I think most Muslims who hate Trump want Killary because they support Syrian Rebels. You cannpt ignore Clinton's role from Benghazi to Syria, and if you read her emails on Wikileaks, she's not going to do anything for Palestinians. Opposition never have access to MI.

Reply
Frederick Jackson
6
Frederick Jackson

Hillary is locked into the neocon agenda and that is presently leading us into confrontation with Russia for no good reason except furthering globalist aims and US hegemony; likewise will continue with the policy of destabilizing all countries in the Muslim world and covertly funding terrorism.

Reply
Visitor
6
Visitor

Because Hillary's track record has proven that she is a neocon's wet dream.

Reply
John Lawrence
6
John Lawrence

for the obvious reasons: Hillary's foreign policy is (in alliance with the Saud family and the other Arab royal families, as well as other U.S.-allied aristocracies) to conquer Russia, whereas Trump's foreign policy is to end jihadism, especially in America.

Reply
Dave Turney
6
Dave Turney

I'm from the uk but so i dont now if i should vote on your poll, but i wish i could vote in your election seeing how much the USA foreign policy will affect me here, since the weasel Cameron will be complicit in any zionist agenda, i trust trump is less likely to go down the same path clinton wants

Reply
CJB
6
CJB

Hillary is a full blown psychopath.

Reply
Carla Venezia
6
Carla Venezia

I think it's sh!tty you've left Bernie Sanders out of this poll. That's something I'd expect from MSM, not 21st Century Wire. I would trust a can opener with U.S. Foreign Policy before I would trust Hillary Clinton with ANYTHING.

Reply
Kevin Davis
6
Kevin Davis

I dont trust Clinton.....period.

Reply
Truthscoop
1
Truthscoop

Hope vs none disclosed

Reply
Alternate Current
1
Alternate Current

How could we possibly vote for the authoritarian crime family member, war criminal. We'll take the unknown over the verified murderer.

Reply
keith milton
1
keith milton

its not that i trust any of them,but clinton is a danger to the world.

Reply
Nicholas Fowler
1
Nicholas Fowler

frankly, and as a Brit, I don't trust either of them but speaking from the gut, I have to say Trump.. sadly once these characters are elected then the men in dark suits take them into a back room, and do what they did to Jimmy Carter we are told.. apparently, afterward he was left in tears....

Reply
Geoff Bridges
1
Geoff Bridges

Clinton has a proven record of being a warmonger. Trump has said he would not fund NATO for other members and would have a dialogue with Russia. I believe the world will be a marginally safer place with Trump than Clinton.

Reply
Billy Singleton
1
Billy Singleton

Between these two at least. We know Hillary works for internationalists(CFR), as she herself has admitted.

Reply
Rahul Varshney
1
Rahul Varshney

Putin & Russia. BRICS r the future. Ayn Rand, Gold backed currency, Gaddafi was resisting the Rothschild fiat failing banks enslaving Africa.

Reply
Russell Fisher
1
Russell Fisher

He wants to stop the wars.

Reply
Carol Donaldson
1
Carol Donaldson

Trump might not talk like a polished political hack, But he doesn't lie. He isn't doing this for personal gain. Hillary is in for the almighty dollar. Donald Trump loves America he will protect us.

Reply
Harry Papis
0
Harry Papis

I think Trump is not a warmonger and hopefully can stand strong against the Neocons.

Reply

Yes, I agree.

5

No, I disagree.

38

Yes, I agree.

5 Comments
Calvin Hamman
0
Calvin Hamman

because if a 16 year old can enroll into the army, they should at least be able to vote.

Reply
Don Elsom
0
Don Elsom

lots of issues being debated today affect 16 YO for years to come. Most are more informed than people my age.

Reply
Darlene Knox
0
Darlene Knox

Only if we bring back civics classes so they understand what they are voting for.

Reply
Mark Clement
0
Mark Clement

kids today are a lot smarter than we were at 16. give 'em a chance to prove themselves.

Reply

No, I disagree.

37 Comments
Joseph Proulx
1
Joseph Proulx

Absolutely not! The voting age should be moved back to 21

Reply
John Driscoll
1
John Driscoll

There is a strong case for restoring the voting age to 21 with an exception for individuals serving with the military or who have been honorably discharge

Reply
Amy Schrader
1
Amy Schrader

Liberals have socialist agenda indoctrinating our kids in the school system. They still live under parents roof, wet behind the ears, NO, NO, NO way they should be allowed to vote yet.

Reply
Kenneth Swipies
1
Kenneth Swipies

The age for most activities should be raised, not lowered. Children are still children.

Reply
Sadie Kittelson
1
Sadie Kittelson

18 was stupid and this insane.!!!!!!

Reply
Lynn Huntley
1
Lynn Huntley

They shouldn't even be allowed to drive. They are NOT mature enough.

Reply
Gramma Jean
0
Gramma Jean

NO! Children are not taught civics and are too immature. Two basic reasons. It was an idea brought out by politics, not common sense.

Reply
Kim Varner
0
Kim Varner

I have a 16 year old. He’s not competent enough to remember to brush his hair and teeth, put deodorant on, put clean clothes on after you shower. No thanks. Leave it to someone who is older.

Reply
Leslie Ann
0
Leslie Ann

Excuse me but... HELL NO... they are NOT all mature enough.

Reply
Kiefer Davis
0
Kiefer Davis

ARE YOU PEOPLE OUT OF YOUR MINDS?

Reply
Kathryn Kinney Evans
0
Kathryn Kinney Evans

Some 16 year olds are mature enough to vote but I would say 90% are not. Voting is an important act and has to be considered carefully.

Reply
Robyn Ryel
0
Robyn Ryel

At 16 you are to influenced by your peers. At that age you are more concerned with what you will wear out Friday night.

Reply
Dilly Powell-Smith
0
Dilly Powell-Smith

Because 16 year olds are not mature enough to be making those kind of decisions.

Reply
Teresa Rodriguez
0
Teresa Rodriguez

Oregon leaders, in their infinite wisdom just moved the smoking age to 21, now want 21 to buy firearms, can't sign a contract til 18, nor live on their own. Now they want more voters, soooooo

Reply
Bradaigh Holt
0
Bradaigh Holt

Absolutely not. It has been scientifically proven that brains (reasoning centers) are not fully developed until age 25.

Reply
Bruce Sharp
0
Bruce Sharp

16 is much too young. Wait until they are out of the house and earning their own living. Love their energy and idealism, but needs to be tempered with experience and pragmatism.

Reply
F Hoskins
0
F Hoskins

They are not emotionally mature enough for serious choices, can be too reactionary

Reply
Anna Howe
0
Anna Howe

They don't know what life is about at 16. Still looking for boy/girl friends.

Reply
Chrissie Wise
0
Chrissie Wise

too young to many immature hormones

Reply
Breeauna Sagdal
0
Breeauna Sagdal

Tide pods, condom snorting and common core... I rest my case! Salem doesn't trust people to own a gun until 21, but voting on future policy is fine? Have you met today's teens?

Reply
Gladys Graybael
0
Gladys Graybael

They not mature or ready to vote, they still out here doing dumbass challenges like sniffing condoms, go missing for 2 days and eating tide pods.

Reply
Fred Farkle
0
Fred Farkle

You know, 15 is almost 16, why not them? Drivers license? 15 year olds can get a permit after taking the same test. While were at it, lower the drinking and marijuana ages to 15 also.

Reply
Kevin Crabtree
0
Kevin Crabtree

Yeah because we all new everything at 16 at least we thought we did. Heck I think its should be raised to 25 that's when you finally figure out you don't know everything

Reply
sharder8
0
sharder8

Tide pods, condom snorting, ice challenge . . . Need I say more?

Reply
Greg and Karen Cross
0
Greg and Karen Cross

At 16 children are vulnerable to peer pressure as well as to people in authority persuading their decisions.

Reply
Kathy Todhunter
0
Kathy Todhunter

Kids at the age of 16 most likely still live at home with parents, they are not of legal age to make decisions and have not worked full time, paid taxes nor have they paid bills for their own support.

Reply
Bob Harlan
0
Bob Harlan

nope they shouldn't be given the right to vote, Legally they aren't responsible for their own lives yet, so why should they be given the privilege of controlling the lives of others.

Reply
Bob Vidourek
0
Bob Vidourek

The canals with water improve on scenic value. Piping would degrade this value.

Reply
Georgeanna Condon
0
Georgeanna Condon

16 year old minds are still developing and changing. No they are barely old enough to know who they are. If you allow them to vote, might as well let them drink, go to war and handle all other adult r

Reply
Fred Farkle
Fred Farkle

agreed. Wait, they're just kids, you can't expect them to drink and fight. They don't understand the consequences, EXACTLY!

Ka San
0
Ka San

Just like smoking and drinking age is 18, as should be the voting age. 16 yr olds are still too much under their parents' authority and would probably just vote however their parents tell them.

Reply
Ken Callison
0
Ken Callison

Before you have the privilege of voting, you should have some skin in the game. Like paying taxes. Being old enough to service in the armed forces, be old enough to be accountable for your actions.

Reply
Dave Voiles
0
Dave Voiles

For heaven's sake! It's all part of the same lefty agenda, just like immigration. Knowing that young people tend to lean liberal it means more Dem votes. They couldn't care less about the kids rights.

Reply
Michael Wagner
0
Michael Wagner

They're still eating tide pods and burning themselves with erasers and want everything for free are you kidding me it should be raised to 21

Reply
Leah Kenville
0
Leah Kenville

Children don't understand what is going on in politics at 16.

Reply
Wanda Hancock
0
Wanda Hancock

Just because they pay taxes, etc. does not mean they know how to vote.....they don't pay attention and have no interest.

Reply
Dave Cupp
0
Dave Cupp

there brains are not fully developed

Reply
Pam Ferguson
0
Pam Ferguson

Kids at that age are to vote what parents or other people tell them not using their own mind &/or beliefs. Barely do at 18!!!!!

Reply

Yes

3

No

1

Yes

1 Comments
Harry D
2
Harry D

The Democratic Party is pushing hateful rhetoric, like calling Trump supporters "fascist" and "nazi" to drive people to violence and cause a color revolution. This must stop.

Reply

No

1 Comment
Fred
0
Fred

Trump has called Democrats “scum,” “vermin,” “animals” and “enemies of the people.” When U.S. Rep. Pelosi’s 82-year-old husband was bludgeoned with a hammer by a deranged man, Trump joked about it.

Reply
Harry D
Harry D

'This Is A Both Sides Issue,' Says Side That Shot President Trump, Assassinated Charlie Kirk, Tried To Assassinate Kavanaugh, Tried To Shoot Trump Again, Shot Steve Scalise, Firebombed Governor Shapiro, Tried To Shoot Trump A Third Time..." Babylon Bee - but true.

Max
Max

They are acting like that, yes.

About Policy

Debates and polls on Policy from the SquareOffs community. Vote on real questions, see how the public is split, and back your side with a defense.

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT