Was the Supreme Court right to overturn Roe v. Wade?

Was the Supreme Court right to overturn Roe v. Wade?

Yes

20

No

18

Yes

Was the Supreme Court right to overturn Roe v. Wade?
5 Comments
Max DeYoung
4
Max DeYoung

Abortion has never, ever been a Constitutional Right. Even Liberal Justice Ruth Ginsberg said that. The SCOTUS only deals with Constitutional Law. Abortion has never, ever been in the Constitution. Six highly qualified Justices corrected this 49 years old error. Now it is fixed. This Case is Closed.

Reply
Stacie Schroeder
Stacie Schroeder

Correction: 6 political appointees lied to Congress and took away our Constitutional right to control our own body.

Mark Cunningham
2
Mark Cunningham

States should determine this.

Reply
Heddesheimer Farms
1
Heddesheimer Farms

Abortion is murder.

Reply

No

Was the Supreme Court right to overturn Roe v. Wade?
8 Comments
Jennifer M
1
Jennifer M

Thankfully there are still states that a woman can feel free to choose what's right for her own self. Plus companies stepping up willing to pay for employees to travel and have procedures done for them. Bravo to them all.

Reply
Max DeYoung
Max DeYoung

Sounds like your boy's coach is a good role model. I am happy for you.

Jack L
Jack L

You`re right Jenn, it should be the woman`s decision to make. This is just another way for men to control women

lois tyler
1
lois tyler

there will still be abortions but not done by MD in a sterile enviroment, instead we will go back to the coat hanger variety done in somebodys back room and there will be more botched abortions with sepsis and deaths as a result. do we want to go back to this? why

Reply
Mary Ricciotti
0
Mary Ricciotti

Men should not make the decision for women. A majority of the American public don’t want this!!! If they are so concerned over a egg unable to be fertilized, I can’t wait till they figure out what a period is!!

Reply
Max DeYoung
Max DeYoung

The Senate Confirms Ketanji Brown Jackson to serve on the U.S. Supreme Court as Stephen Breyer's replacement, she can't even define what a woman is. How would she ever understand what an egg or a period is?

Letitia DenHartog
0
Letitia DenHartog

I believe that a woman should have the right to make decisions about her body, with support from her physician.

Reply
Laressa Rehagen
0
Laressa Rehagen

What is this, the victorian era. No man has the right to force his views on me. Leave my life, my body and my decisions alone.

Reply
Jennifer M
Jennifer M

How dare you Max!? Don't you ever tell a woman to but out if it deals with her own body! How schovenistic can you be? I get you have your views and are entitled to them. It's doesn't give you a right to force them on anyone.

Jennifer M
Jennifer M

If it deals with my body, then I have every right, sir.

Jack L
Jack L

It`s not Democrats who are trying to tell women what to do with their own bodies

Max DeYoung
Max DeYoung

I am also a father and a grandfather. The fetus, also belongs to the father. You butt out. Since Roe v Wade happened in 1973 over 63 million babies, have had their lives ended, by so called "professional health specialists." I've never seen a baby walk away from an abortion.

Judy Garcia
0
Judy Garcia

No one should be permitted to tell another adult what they can and cannot do with their own body. Any state that bans abortion is violating the separation of church and state by imposing their religious beliefs on the population.

Reply
Max DeYoung
Max DeYoung

It is much easier, and more economical, to prevent an unwanted pregnancy, than it is to deal with an unwanted pregnancy. And a life would not have to be lost. Abortions cause a lot of grief after the fact, for many people. Abortions also cause other health risks.

Jennifer M
Jennifer M

My son's football coach is very religious but he keeps it separate from his teaching at school and on the field. I'm proud this coach stood up for it.

Jennifer M
Jennifer M

Glad he won. He wasn't forcing anyone else to join him. Nobody should be able to tell him he can't do that.

Max DeYoung
Max DeYoung

And, Coach Kennedy won his Supreme Court Decision about Praying on the Football field. Thanks to six High Quality Supreme Court Justices. Now coaches all over the USA can mentor without fear of constitutional rights being taken away by liberal progressives through agenda-driven legislation.

Jennifer M
Jennifer M

Masks and vaccines have nothing to do with religious beliefs.

Jennifer M
Jennifer M

Absolutely right!

Jack L
Jack L

Max, some people don`t share your religious views, or your religion

Max DeYoung
Max DeYoung

ROMANS 14:12 "Everyone" is going to stand before God one day and give an account of their life on Earth. This comment may not suit "everyone". But it applies to "everyone", regardless of their personal beliefs, or lack of beliefs, social standing, where they live, or who they think they are.

Lisa Gore
Lisa Gore

Like masks or vaccine mandates right?

Stacie Schroeder
0
Stacie Schroeder

Every woman should have the right to control her own body and not everyone agrees that life begins at conception. If you don't agree with abortion, don't have one, but don't force your religious views on others

Reply
Dave Ford
0
Dave Ford

It is IMO absolutely unconstitutional to force ones morals/beliefs onto someone else.

Reply
Max DeYoung
Max DeYoung

Pro-choice and morals don't belong in the same conversation.

Lisa Gore
Lisa Gore

Exactly.

Should the voting age be lowered to 16?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
1,550 Votes

Should the voting age be lowered to 16?

Yes, I agree.

5

No, I disagree.

38

Yes, I agree.

5 Comments
Calvin Hamman
0
Calvin Hamman

because if a 16 year old can enroll into the army, they should at least be able to vote.

Reply
Don Elsom
0
Don Elsom

lots of issues being debated today affect 16 YO for years to come. Most are more informed than people my age.

Reply
Darlene Knox
0
Darlene Knox

Only if we bring back civics classes so they understand what they are voting for.

Reply
Mark Clement
0
Mark Clement

kids today are a lot smarter than we were at 16. give 'em a chance to prove themselves.

Reply

No, I disagree.

37 Comments
Joseph Proulx
1
Joseph Proulx

Absolutely not! The voting age should be moved back to 21

Reply
John Driscoll
1
John Driscoll

There is a strong case for restoring the voting age to 21 with an exception for individuals serving with the military or who have been honorably discharge

Reply
Amy Schrader
1
Amy Schrader

Liberals have socialist agenda indoctrinating our kids in the school system. They still live under parents roof, wet behind the ears, NO, NO, NO way they should be allowed to vote yet.

Reply
Kenneth Swipies
1
Kenneth Swipies

The age for most activities should be raised, not lowered. Children are still children.

Reply
Sadie Kittelson
1
Sadie Kittelson

18 was stupid and this insane.!!!!!!

Reply
Lynn Huntley
1
Lynn Huntley

They shouldn't even be allowed to drive. They are NOT mature enough.

Reply
Gramma Jean
0
Gramma Jean

NO! Children are not taught civics and are too immature. Two basic reasons. It was an idea brought out by politics, not common sense.

Reply
Kim Varner
0
Kim Varner

I have a 16 year old. He’s not competent enough to remember to brush his hair and teeth, put deodorant on, put clean clothes on after you shower. No thanks. Leave it to someone who is older.

Reply
Leslie Ann
0
Leslie Ann

Excuse me but... HELL NO... they are NOT all mature enough.

Reply
Kiefer Davis
0
Kiefer Davis

ARE YOU PEOPLE OUT OF YOUR MINDS?

Reply
Kathryn Kinney Evans
0
Kathryn Kinney Evans

Some 16 year olds are mature enough to vote but I would say 90% are not. Voting is an important act and has to be considered carefully.

Reply
Robyn Ryel
0
Robyn Ryel

At 16 you are to influenced by your peers. At that age you are more concerned with what you will wear out Friday night.

Reply
Dilly Powell-Smith
0
Dilly Powell-Smith

Because 16 year olds are not mature enough to be making those kind of decisions.

Reply
Teresa Rodriguez
0
Teresa Rodriguez

Oregon leaders, in their infinite wisdom just moved the smoking age to 21, now want 21 to buy firearms, can't sign a contract til 18, nor live on their own. Now they want more voters, soooooo

Reply
Bradaigh Holt
0
Bradaigh Holt

Absolutely not. It has been scientifically proven that brains (reasoning centers) are not fully developed until age 25.

Reply
Bruce Sharp
0
Bruce Sharp

16 is much too young. Wait until they are out of the house and earning their own living. Love their energy and idealism, but needs to be tempered with experience and pragmatism.

Reply
F Hoskins
0
F Hoskins

They are not emotionally mature enough for serious choices, can be too reactionary

Reply
Anna Howe
0
Anna Howe

They don't know what life is about at 16. Still looking for boy/girl friends.

Reply
Chrissie Wise
0
Chrissie Wise

too young to many immature hormones

Reply
Breeauna Sagdal
0
Breeauna Sagdal

Tide pods, condom snorting and common core... I rest my case! Salem doesn't trust people to own a gun until 21, but voting on future policy is fine? Have you met today's teens?

Reply
Gladys Graybael
0
Gladys Graybael

They not mature or ready to vote, they still out here doing dumbass challenges like sniffing condoms, go missing for 2 days and eating tide pods.

Reply
Fred Farkle
0
Fred Farkle

You know, 15 is almost 16, why not them? Drivers license? 15 year olds can get a permit after taking the same test. While were at it, lower the drinking and marijuana ages to 15 also.

Reply
Kevin Crabtree
0
Kevin Crabtree

Yeah because we all new everything at 16 at least we thought we did. Heck I think its should be raised to 25 that's when you finally figure out you don't know everything

Reply
sharder8
0
sharder8

Tide pods, condom snorting, ice challenge . . . Need I say more?

Reply
Greg and Karen Cross
0
Greg and Karen Cross

At 16 children are vulnerable to peer pressure as well as to people in authority persuading their decisions.

Reply
Kathy Todhunter
0
Kathy Todhunter

Kids at the age of 16 most likely still live at home with parents, they are not of legal age to make decisions and have not worked full time, paid taxes nor have they paid bills for their own support.

Reply
Bob Harlan
0
Bob Harlan

nope they shouldn't be given the right to vote, Legally they aren't responsible for their own lives yet, so why should they be given the privilege of controlling the lives of others.

Reply
Bob Vidourek
0
Bob Vidourek

The canals with water improve on scenic value. Piping would degrade this value.

Reply
Georgeanna Condon
0
Georgeanna Condon

16 year old minds are still developing and changing. No they are barely old enough to know who they are. If you allow them to vote, might as well let them drink, go to war and handle all other adult r

Reply
Fred Farkle
Fred Farkle

agreed. Wait, they're just kids, you can't expect them to drink and fight. They don't understand the consequences, EXACTLY!

Ka San
0
Ka San

Just like smoking and drinking age is 18, as should be the voting age. 16 yr olds are still too much under their parents' authority and would probably just vote however their parents tell them.

Reply
Ken Callison
0
Ken Callison

Before you have the privilege of voting, you should have some skin in the game. Like paying taxes. Being old enough to service in the armed forces, be old enough to be accountable for your actions.

Reply
Dave Voiles
0
Dave Voiles

For heaven's sake! It's all part of the same lefty agenda, just like immigration. Knowing that young people tend to lean liberal it means more Dem votes. They couldn't care less about the kids rights.

Reply
Michael Wagner
0
Michael Wagner

They're still eating tide pods and burning themselves with erasers and want everything for free are you kidding me it should be raised to 21

Reply
Leah Kenville
0
Leah Kenville

Children don't understand what is going on in politics at 16.

Reply
Wanda Hancock
0
Wanda Hancock

Just because they pay taxes, etc. does not mean they know how to vote.....they don't pay attention and have no interest.

Reply
Dave Cupp
0
Dave Cupp

there brains are not fully developed

Reply
Pam Ferguson
0
Pam Ferguson

Kids at that age are to vote what parents or other people tell them not using their own mind &/or beliefs. Barely do at 18!!!!!

Reply
Have you watched Trump's comments after the White House Correspondents' Dinner?

Have you watched Trump's comments after the White House Correspondents' Dinner?

Yes

3

No

1

Yes

1 Comments
Harry D
2
Harry D

The Democratic Party is pushing hateful rhetoric, like calling Trump supporters "fascist" and "nazi" to drive people to violence and cause a color revolution. This must stop.

Reply

No

1 Comment
Fred
0
Fred

Trump has called Democrats “scum,” “vermin,” “animals” and “enemies of the people.” When U.S. Rep. Pelosi’s 82-year-old husband was bludgeoned with a hammer by a deranged man, Trump joked about it.

Reply
Harry D
Harry D

'This Is A Both Sides Issue,' Says Side That Shot President Trump, Assassinated Charlie Kirk, Tried To Assassinate Kavanaugh, Tried To Shoot Trump Again, Shot Steve Scalise, Firebombed Governor Shapiro, Tried To Shoot Trump A Third Time..." Babylon Bee - but true.

Max
Max

They are acting like that, yes.

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT