#Tech: Would you use these Smart Contact Lens?

Asked by Sai Gohel

224 Votes

#Tech: Would you use these Smart Contact Lens?

38%

OMG Yes! OMG Yes!

62%

No Way! No Way!

38%

OMG Yes!

See the full article at Wired: https://www.wired.com/story/mojo-vision-smart-contact-lens/

See the full article at Wired: https://www.wired.com/story/mojo-vision-smart-contact-lens/ Show Less

0 Comments

No one has commented yet

62%

No Way!

1 Comment

Mike Aronow

In all fairness, I wouldn't wear any contact lens.

Tue, 21 Jan 2020 23:13:28 -0600

Should Covid-19 physical distancing rules in schools change from 6 feet to 3 feet apart?

Asked by KTVZ

725 Votes

Should Covid-19 physical distancing rules in schools change from 6 feet to 3 feet apart?

72%

Yes, they should change! Yes, they should change!

28%

No, this is not good! No, this is not good!

72%

Yes, they should change!

I think loosening some Covid-19 restrictions will allow schools to return to full time instructions. I think our priority should be getting them back in the classroom so they're... Show More

I think loosening some Covid-19 restrictions will allow schools to return to full time instructions. I think our priority should be getting them back in the classroom so they're learning isn't hampered. Show Less

11 Comments

Robert Northrup

Schools should never have been closed. This whole thing has been a political tragedy to prove government has the power to make us bend our knees to them.

Fri, 12 Mar 2021 08:40:00 -0600

Mask mandate needs to fully stop in every work place. Social distancing as well. Enough is enough. We have our right, to have our free right to choose for our self's back!

Fri, 12 Mar 2021 00:33:59 -0600

Greg Moore

Comments on other side are comical. Claims they are relying on "experts", but they lack critical thinking... never asking for the science used for 6' distancing, and ignore the Oxford/Harvard experts saying 3' is all that is necessary for school. They ignore real world examples. Ignore the harm.

Fri, 12 Mar 2021 10:19:29 -0500

Greg Moore

The science is clear - 6' distancing in schools is not necessary, which is why Europe goes by 1m (3.2'). 6' prevents schools from having more than 1/3rd capacity/instruction, & kids from even remotely normal social interaction. READ THE SCIENCE: https://academic.oup.com/cid/advance-article/

Thu, 11 Mar 2021 20:48:40 -0600

Greg Moore

And with masks, people are allowed to cram into airplanes with 6", rather than 6' distancing, with different "cohorts" every time... but kids can't be allowed 3' apart? More science for those that care about it.... Harvard suggesting 3': https://dailyvoice.com/massachusetts/worcester/school

Thu, 11 Mar 2021 22:10:50 -0500

Tawnya McPhetridge

Kids are already in masks that they don't need to be in!! They don't need to social distance too. There is no science for them to be 6 feel apart or even 3 feet apart! Kids need to be kids! They all need to be on school full time! If teachers are vaccinated why do kids have to wear masks?

Thu, 11 Mar 2021 20:08:05 -0600

Sandy Thompson

There should not be a mandatory amount. Let the huggers be huggers! Take away physical contact and just makes people more depressed

Sat, 27 Mar 2021 15:18:40 -0500

k san

Whatever the science says!!

Sat, 13 Mar 2021 19:38:26 -0500

Christena

This shouldn't even be a concern.

Sun, 28 Mar 2021 23:53:46 -0400

28%

No, this is not good!

I don't agree this with loosening Covid-19 restrictions. It's not safe and we are putting our children and the staff at risk. We should follow the CDC guidelines.

I don't agree this with loosening Covid-19 restrictions. It's not safe and we are putting our children and the staff at risk. We should follow the CDC guidelines. Show Less

3 Comments

Judi L Leisey

No since there are some parents that are sending their kids to school when they have a positive test.

Mon, 15 Mar 2021 13:08:20 -0400

Greg Moore

Judi, how big of a problem is that? The science is saying that it is not a statistically relevant issue? Because the most infinitesimally small risk may be possible, you would hurt kids? The kids are not at even remotely significant risk. Teachers are immunized. Concerned? Stay home.

Mon, 15 Mar 2021 17:44:57 -0400

Judy Ostrom-Dixon

Just a little bit longer and we can go back to normal!!!!

Fri, 12 Mar 2021 07:17:53 -0500

P Robbins

We need to continue following CDC guidelines or we will , again, make matters worse. To keep schools open, follow the CDC guidelines. When they change, we can change. We shouldn't try to be "smarter" than the experts.

Thu, 11 Mar 2021 20:24:31 -0600

Greg Moore

So, do you still oppose the reduction now that the CDC has come out concluding that 3' is adequate?

Fri, 19 Mar 2021 12:32:37 -0400

Could this new treatment be the cure for all cancers?

Asked by Sai Gohel

237 Votes

Could this new treatment be the cure for all cancers?

27%

Likely Likely

73%

More Study Needed More Study Needed

27%

Likely

“During lab testing, the team says the T-cells were able to kill a host of cancers, including lung, skin, blood, colon, breast, bone, prostate, ovarian, kidney and cervical canc... Show More

“During lab testing, the team says the T-cells were able to kill a host of cancers, including lung, skin, blood, colon, breast, bone, prostate, ovarian, kidney and cervical cancer cells. Healthy cells were not killed during lab tests.” – USA Today Show Less

2 Comments

Dkelley Yancey

If they don’t all ready have a cure they’ll never provide one because it’s the biggest cash cow EVER and they’ll surely never give it up.

Tue, 28 Jan 2020 21:23:55 -0600

Dkelley Yancey

If they don’t all ready have a cure they’ll never provide one because it’s the biggest cash cow EVER and they’ll surely never give it up.

Tue, 28 Jan 2020 21:23:55 -0600

73%

More Study Needed

“researchers still need to determine what exactly the T-cell receptors are detecting on the MR1 and whether that's specific to cancer cells.” Read the full discovery at USA To... Show More

“researchers still need to determine what exactly the T-cell receptors are detecting on the MR1 and whether that's specific to cancer cells.” Read the full discovery at USA Today: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2020/01/22/cancer-treatment-study-t-cell-finding-may-lead-universal-therapy/4529056002/ Show Less

0 Comments

No one has commented yet

Who to Follow

#Tech: Would you use these Smart Contact Lens?

38% OMG Yes! OMG Yes!

62% No Way! No Way!

38% OMG Yes!

62% No Way!

Should Covid-19 physical distancing rules in schools change from 6 feet to 3 feet apart?

72% Yes, they should change! Yes, they should change!

28% No, this is not good! No, this is not good!

72% Yes, they should change!

28% No, this is not good!

Could this new treatment be the cure for all cancers?

27% Likely Likely

73% More Study Needed More Study Needed

27% Likely

73% More Study Needed

38%

OMG Yes! OMG Yes!

62%

No Way! No Way!

38%

OMG Yes!

62%

No Way!

72%

Yes, they should change! Yes, they should change!

28%

No, this is not good! No, this is not good!

72%

Yes, they should change!

28%

No, this is not good!

27%

Likely Likely

73%

More Study Needed More Study Needed

27%

Likely

73%

More Study Needed