Is more regulation needed to stop or reduce mass shootings?

Is more regulation needed to stop or reduce mass shootings?

Yes

1

No

4

Yes

Is more regulation needed to stop or reduce mass shootings?
1 Comment
Martha Wilson Doney
0
Martha Wilson Doney

Its about time we stopped selling assault rifles. Need tighter gun control!

Reply
Max DeYoung
Max DeYoung

There is no such thing as an assault rifle. That is a phony term, created by people, that are intent upon removing our Constitution Rights. Rifles, and other weapons like knives, axes, and even vehicles do not arbitrarily attack people. Sick people attack people. Please educate yourself.

No

Is more regulation needed to stop or reduce mass shootings?
2 Comments
Max DeYoung
2
Max DeYoung

There are plenty of laws. The laws that we have need to be enforced. That goes for all laws, and all crimes. More laws, are not a solution. Just how hard is this to understand?

Reply
Should the Trump administration fight a judge's order that it fully fund SNAP?

Should the Trump administration fight a judge's order that it fully fund SNAP?

Yes

3

No

3

Yes

2 Comments
Fat Guy Outdoors
1
Fat Guy Outdoors

Defund all welfare programs. Make people responsible for their own actions.

Reply
Max
0
Max

SNAP is primarily funded by the U.S. federal government through congressional appropriations, with the USDA providing the funds, and states administering the program and covering their share of administrative costs.

Reply

No

3 Comments
Eric Smith
1
Eric Smith

Trump basically has no say in this, it's on the shoulders of Congress. Might want to study what all the 111th Congress did back in 2009-11... this is all about payback.

Reply
Zaos Gonzolez
0
Zaos Gonzolez

Spend the money on something else. Send missiles to israel instead.

Reply
Toasty
0
Toasty

Its all a game both sides are playing with real people in the middle. Trump should step aside and tell congress this mess is all theirs.

Reply
Max
Max

Schumer knows this is all on the backs of the democrats.

Do you believe the POTUS should have broad authority to impose tariffs on other countries?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
147 Votes

Do you believe the POTUS should have broad authority to impose tariffs on other countries?

Yes

2

No

4

Yes

2 Comments
William Schwabe
0
William Schwabe

Because the president wants to put America first and make it as prosperous as it once was. #MAGA

Reply
Steven Miles
0
Steven Miles

Exec branch has the responsibility to manage the economy with other countries, congress can’t even produce an annual budget - look at this democrat shutdown, they want to spend another 1.5T on healthcare subsidies- sorry, we are in the hole $35T, wake up America.

Reply

No

4 Comments
k san
0
k san

Congress has the power of the purse, if only they would use it. but they're too scared of being primaried by him. Of course, he should not have 1/3 of the powers he has adopted, whether constitutional or not. He's an abomination!!

Reply
Tom Pummer
0
Tom Pummer

Trump’s tariffs violate the constitution. Congress holds the nations purse strings. I can’t believe we hardly heard a peep from members of Congress on his actions. Spineless

Reply
Rick Martinson
0
Rick Martinson

Absolutely not. The Constitution gives that authority to Congress, NOT the executive branch of the government. Trump’s actions are absolutely illegal and unconstitutional. But he doesn’t care, and has been giving Congress and the American People the finger for the past 10 months.

Reply
Mike Moreno
0
Mike Moreno

Memo to trump...there is a document in this country called the Constitution. Read it, learn it, live it.

Reply

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT