362
5
Do you think the FBI search of Mar-a-Lago was justified?
Asked By
News-Press Now
82
2
Do you agree with George Santos being pardoned?
Asked By
News-Press Now
155
2
Do you agree with the University of Arizona declining the f...
Asked By
13 On Your Side
77
0
Were you affected by AWS outage today?
Asked By
13 On Your Side
34
0
Have you struggled to find work in the current job market?
Asked By
News-Press Now
166
4
Do you plan on participating in a No Kings protest?
Asked By
KTVZ
119
1
Should journalists follow the Pentagon's new press policy?
Asked By
13 On Your Side
52
0
Do you think the Israel/Hamas ceasefire will hold?
Asked By
News-Press Now
206
2
Have you seen your insurance premiums go up in recent years?
Asked By
KTVZ
320
8
Do you agree with the administration's assessment of Portland?
Asked By
KTVZ
149
2
Do you think Adelita Grijalva should be sworn in soon?
Asked By
13 On Your Side
111
2
Who carries the most blame for the shutdown?
Asked By
News-Press Now
137
0
Do you hope the government shutdown will end soon?
Asked By
13 On Your Side
130
0
Would you be impacted by a government shutdown?
Asked By
13 On Your Side
510
8
Should President Trump send troops into Portland, Oregon, t...
Asked By
ABC 17 News
Asked by
Yes
0
Comment
No one has commented yet
No
2
Comments
Asked by
13 On Your Side
155 Votes
Do you agree with the University of Arizona declining the funding deal from the White House?
Yes
1
Comment
raoverton@yahoo.com
This isn't about skin color. This is about Trump suppressing the sovereignty of Universities just as Hitler did in 1930s Germany. A stupid, compliant public is what every dictator wants. Who cares what bathrooms we use?
ReplyNo
1
Comment
Fred Schauer
MLK said not to look at the color of your skin but the value of their self. Anything based on race, skin color or any biological feature should never be used as a determining factor. Doing so puts all the headway MLK in relations null and mute.
Reply
Trending
Who to Follow
Become a Partner
📱 Download the App: iOS
Support Publishers About Blog Shop Facebook Twitter Instagram Privacy Terms Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information Community Guidelines © 2025 SquareOffs Social Polling Platform
Indefensible for the former president to hold onto documents that are government property and contain sensitive national security information
ReplyA few months ago there were 15 boxes returned from there, they knew there was more. They asked for them, he did not comply. They were just taking back what he stole.
ReplyThere was a judge-approved warrant, his attorneys were present, and they were notified in advance after a subpoena was issued months before and ignored. It was not a raid, no one broke down any doors, and there were clearly urgent reasons to move forward even if they cannot be disclosed.
ReplyEveryone should be accountable for their actions. Trump appointed FBI head and judges authorized the search. Previous formal requests had been ignored.
Reply