Do you think a home energy score should be mandatory to sell a house?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
858 Votes

Do you think a home energy score should be mandatory to sell a house?

Yes

0

No

10

Yes

0 Comments
No one has commented yet

No

10 Comments
Thomas K. Marple
1
Thomas K. Marple

It would just create another bureaucratic requirement for residents at the expense of homeowners and would not accomplish anything. Prospective buyers can already higher a home inspector to evaluate a home before they purchase. the City Council should BUTT OUT!

Reply
Sussie Due
0
Sussie Due

That should be up to the buyer to do that NOT the seller.

Reply
Paul Bianchina
0
Paul Bianchina

Another perfect example of the hypocrisy of the current city council, who seems determined to ruin Bend. They whine and cry about affordable housing, then add more red tape to make houses more expensive. It's up to a buyer to understand the home they're buying, not the government!!

Reply
Native Oregonian
0
Native Oregonian

It only adds to the cost of buying an already over priced home. If buyers want to know what an energy score is, they can pay for an energy survey on their own when buying the house, at their own expense. This council needs to start listening to what their constituents want, and stop wasting time.

Reply
Neil Mackey
0
Neil Mackey

Just another example of government sticking their nose into private citizens' personal affairs! If a potential buyer and seller want to work that issue out as part of a (potential) sale, that should be THEIR choice, not a mandate by the City of Bend....

Reply
Gabe West
0
Gabe West

Another hidden tax

Reply
Steven Daniels
Steven Daniels

You like the ones that pay for your wheelchair and other "benefits", right?

Gabe West
Gabe West

Insurance pays for my wheelchair

Steven Daniels
Steven Daniels

You mean Medicaid? And your other "benefits"?

Should it be harder to get state constitutional amendments on the ballot?

Should it be harder to get state constitutional amendments on the ballot?

Yes

2

No

3

Yes

2 Comments
Harry D
1
Harry D

Absolutely! Way too much out-of-state dark money is buying constitutional amendments and creating intended unintended consequences during off year elections with small voter turnouts. Amendments should require super majorities (66%) and only take place during presidential elections. FJB

Reply
Max DeYoung
0
Max DeYoung

Our Constitution is the strength and security of our Freedoms. Any attempt to alter it by a slim majority, is a direct Assault on our Freedoms. Protect our Safety and Freedom by protecting our Constitution.

Reply

No

3 Comments
Thomas Holbrook II
0
Thomas Holbrook II

Dark money is an excuse to prevent we the people from correcting mistakes the state government has made.

Reply
Carl-Hermann Freese
0
Carl-Hermann Freese

Because the people need dome direct control

Reply
John Starke
0
John Starke

Representative government relies on the voice of the people being heard. Constitutional Amendments are a very important method of making that happen. No wonder the people in charge want to diminish this right of the people. It interferes with their plans for authoritarian rule.

Reply
Do you think the bill banning TikTok will pass?

Do you think the bill banning TikTok will pass?

Yes

0

No

1

Yes

0 Comments
No one has commented yet

No

1 Comment
David Pierce
0
David Pierce

Popularity amongst young adults.

Reply

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT