Fbi SquareOffs

Yes

2

No

3

Yes

Peter Cassidy
0
Peter Cassidy

The top DOJ officials determined that there was solid evidence that the former President had official classified documents. That is, simply put breaking a federal law.

Reply
Jim Smith
Jim Smith

Just the same as Hillary Clinton. She took classified info, but she distroyed 30,000 incriminating emails. Never charged, never raided. Why the difference?

Manuel Bermudez
0
Manuel Bermudez

Because it’s against the law to remove White House documents after you’ve left office. These docs don’t belong to a retired president. They belong to the American people. It’s a federal law. As a president he should have known this. Just sayin ….

Reply

No

ray hst
0
ray hst

I voted no simply because I cannot believe that my country would do it without political gain. If our leaders were truly honest and law abiding, I would say if evidence points to wrongdoing go for it. Nobody should be above the law. But remember, do you think our government is honest? Right...

Reply
Joanne Dunham Sealund
0
Joanne Dunham Sealund

This is just another fishing' expedition . Dems are desperate to find something, anything to keep him from running for office.

Reply

YES

4

NO

13

YES

Adam
0
Adam

Seriously? You're comparing checking a carry conceal permit to the murdering of millions of Jewish people? Wow!!!

Reply
Max DeYoung
Max DeYoung

Of the nearly 21 million slaughtered, only six million were Jewish.

Max DeYoung
Max DeYoung

They were disarmed then slaughtered. It won't happen here.

Max DeYoung
Max DeYoung

They were disarmed so they could be herded into boxcars to be slaughtered. Less than 1/3rd of the murdered were Jews. Many were homosexuals, and a huge variety of other religions and professions, including handicapped, aged and retarded, but anyone who had sixth grade history knows that.

Jennifer M
0
Jennifer M

How I read it, the FBI is just checking records to make sure concealed gun holders records are accurate. They're not taking anyone's guns. I guess unless they don't have a permit. If I'm reading into this wrong, please politely correct me as this area is new to me

Reply
Adam
Adam

I thought KMIZ was supposed to get rid of douche bags like you that all you do is bully others and can't just be part of a conversation?

Max DeYoung
Max DeYoung

Many people from Germany and other European nations said the same thing before the various major genocides carried out by the Nazis and the numbers likely murdered: 20,946,000 Victims: Nazi Germany 1933 To 1945

Adam
Adam

Something funny?

Max DeYoung
Max DeYoung

Would it be okay if the FBI checked your medical records to make sure your doctor is in compliance with the law?

Max DeYoung
Max DeYoung

Barry Soetero politicalized the FBI, and the FBI has no right or authority to interfere with state laws. Todays Federal government cannot be trusted. In Missouri, and many other states, it's not required to have a permit to conceal and carry. It's called government overreach, and it's illegal.

NO

Lida Vitt
3
Lida Vitt

Privacy concerns and government over reach!

Reply
GeorgeandRobin King
3
GeorgeandRobin King

Federal Gov. would like too take firearms away from law abiding citizens.

Reply
Max DeYoung
3
Max DeYoung

The Second Amendment gives citizens the Right to own and Bear Arms. The FBI has no right to interfere, in any way, shape, or form.

Reply
Lisa Howard Glass
3
Lisa Howard Glass

The FBI doesn't need a list of people to go to, to disarm.

Reply

65%
Yes WINNER

1

35%
No

0

65%
Yes

Fred Marsico
0
Fred Marsico

Because it was murder of a man who dared defy the overreach of a private corporation posing as a government agency. There was no justification for killing a man with his hands raised.

Reply

35%
No

No one has commented yet

About Fbi

Debates and polls on Fbi from the SquareOffs community. Vote on real questions, see how the public is split, and back your side with a defense.

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT