Yes
No
No one has commented yet
Election SquareOffs
47
0
Will you vote in the upcoming primary elections?
Asked By
News-Press Now
52
0
Are you pleased with the results of the Arizona primary election?
.png?1683934188 "13 On Your Side")
Asked By
13 On Your Side
18
0
Did you vote in the Arizona primary election today?
Asked By
13 On Your Side
0
0
Did you vote in the Arizona primary today?
Asked By
13 On Your Side
52
1
Will you be voting in the Arizona primary tomorrow?
Asked By
13 On Your Side
51
1
Do you agree with Graham Platner dropping out of the U.S. Senate race?
Asked By
13 On Your Side
58
0
Do you think Graham Platner should drop out of the U.S. Senate race?
Asked By
13 On Your Side
50
0
Are you registered to vote for the Arizona primary election?
Asked By
13 On Your Side
30
0
Are you satisfied with the results of the California primary?
Asked By
13 On Your Side
20
0
Did you vote in the California primary?
Asked By
13 On Your Side
24
0
Will you be voting in the California primary?
Asked By
13 On Your Side
40
0
Should stricter campaigning rules be enforced?
Asked By
13 On Your Side
138
2
Should mail-in voting be limited?
Asked By
News-Press Now
.jpg "How Are You Making Your Vote In The Primary Election?")
50
0
How Are You Making Your Vote In The Primary Election?
Asked By
NewsChannel312
23
0
Are you ready to vote in the California primary?
Asked By
13 On Your Side
.png?1683934188 "13 On Your Side")
Asked by
Yes
No one has commented yet
No
No one has commented yet
Asked by
Yes
Lee Rabidoux
They were hired by the voters to do a job and they failed. Their obligation is to represent everyplace in their district and they demonstrated nothing but contempt for that obligation and oath.
Reply
Lee Rabidoux
They were hired by the voters to do a job and they failed. Their obligation is to represent everyplace in their district and they demonstrated nothing but contempt for that obligation and oath.
Reply
Gabe West
Measure 113 was clearly an effort by the majority to disenfranchise the minority. This needs to get before the US Supreme Court as quickly as possible. Clearly unconstitutional.
John Sutton
Because most of us voted for the bill to be passed for that reason. They could have pass way more bills that would have benefited all of us.
Reply
John Sutton
Because most of us voted for the bill to be passed for that reason. They could have pass way more bills that would have benefited all of us.
Reply
daniel tovar
they went in knowing that it was a law and willfully did not go to work, just to slow the process they were hired to perform.
ReplyNo
Rick Allen
They did the right thing, keeping the left from passing more bad legislature! I mean look what they have done, defunding police, increased crime rates significantly, especially in Portland, decriminalizing hard drugs, they turned Portland into a a crime ridden, drug ridden slime pit. Vote Republican
Reply
Gabe West
Measure 113 was clearly an effort by the majority to disenfranchise the minority. This needs to get before the US Supreme Court as quickly as possible. Clearly unconstitutional. Where can I donate to the GOP to fight this?????
Reply
Stang1960
CB ... The 14th Amendment for voters rights. Not allowing voters to vote for who they want could be unconstitutional. We shall see :) Oh, Childishly insulting individual's for their opinions is a sign of weakness in ones argument, just saying :)
CB
Lol, what's unconstitutional about it? Gabe, you are regurgitating the BS you hear on Fox News. You don't actually know what you're taking about. I hope it does go to the supreme court so when it's determined to be constitutional, other states follow course. The GOP is a dying, outdated breed.
Trending
Who to Follow
About Election
Debates and polls on Election from the SquareOffs community. Vote on real questions, see how the public is split, and back your side with a defense.
Become a Partner
📱 Download the App: iOS
Support Publishers About Blog Shop Facebook Twitter Instagram Privacy Terms Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information Community Guidelines © 2026 SquareOffs Social Polling Platform
They should all have to take part in at least 2 debates in an election year. It should be a must for everyone. If someone doesn’t want to take part in the process then their name is not on the ballot! No one is spacial enough to sit out! Only someone scared of the truth would want to sit out!!!
Reply