Asked by
36%
Agree
36%
4
64%
Disagree
WINNER
64%
2
36%
Agree
36%
64%
Disagree
64%
It's a flawed study because it assumes 'percentage of blue chippers' is a useful way of measuring recruiting class strength. Sam McKewon writes: http://squareoffs.co/1bOZ4YB
It's a flawed study because it assumes 'percentage of blue chippers' is a useful way of measuring recruiting class strength. Sam McKewon writes: http://squareoffs.co/1bOZ4YB
Show Less
Kraig Lundberg
McKewon completely shreds the shallow piece of work that SB Nation calls journalism. I could write a book about why it was so poor and why our recruiting is actually getting noticeably better.
Reply
It is painfully true. Look at the current recruiting classes of the top 10 teams in the nation and compare their 4-5 star recruits to NU. It is obvious that talent in recruiting is an absolute.
Replywithout any other metric, the average star ratings reflect that decline
Replywell look ho we do, 'it then,theres your answer
ReplyHuskers don't talk about walk on like they did in the past.
Reply