The council make enough salary to buy apartment buildings or big mansions while normal people are left to be judged by them who live in a bubble.
ReplyPeople should be able to build what they can afford. They need to conform to SOME regulations, but don't make it so difficult for everyone. And people need to keep their noses out of neighbors' business.
ReplyI have a tiny house, and when I went down to the county to try to obtain a legal permit the guy working LAUGHED IN MY FACE. The city needs to do more to provide options for the middle class. I work full time, born and raised here with a college degree and I can barely afford Bend anymore...
Reply$1500.00 a day is a cruel and completely out of place fine. Everybody would/should agree $1500.00 a day is outlandish plus affordable house is hard to come by
ReplyI do not agree with the cities regulations on tiny homes. There is no affordable housing for regular people trying to make a living.
ReplyHis tiny home should be counted as a RV if it's on wheels they're being ridiculous and the neighbor is freaking nosy for turning him in people don't have anything better to do than bother other people that are trying to make a home for themselves unbelievable I'm glad I don't live there
ReplyGo get license plates for your trailer then it's a vehicle and you should be allowed to park at your driveway. Also check your laws there is always a loophole to be found. If you own the property look up homesteading. Join tiny homes on Facebook they have a lot of advice lots of lawyers join them.
ReplyMy HOA only allows one shed in our backyards. So the second shed will be on wheels with a tow hitch. Therefore second shed is not a shed at all. It's a tailor.
Affordable housing is only lip service. A very ambiguous term. Affordable for who? Affordability is a subjective term.
It's his property. The home is nice. People need to mind their own damn business. I could see if it was something that was endangering someone else but we have apartments here in Washington state that are smaller than that.
ReplyCity encouraged such building. Yes, builder should have obtained permit BUT the City itself set up the road- blocks to do so. What a bunch of hooey! Ugh.
ReplyThere is a housing crisis in Oregon and the tuny home met all criteria except for wheelchairs. There are lots of 2nd story apartment buildings that cannot be accessed by Wheelchairs. The city is afraid of affordable housing. They just want people on the streets!
ReplyJust more liberal regulators. Bend has become over regulated and over priced. Ease the regulations and just leave people alone to live their lives in a way they can afford. Stop the ridiculousness already! $1,500 a day? You've all lost your ever loin' minds. You simply have no hearts and souls.
ReplyThe rules that Deschutes have is why we have so many homeless and the rents are outrageous. So we will continue to see people on streets as the county workers laugh in our faces as we try to deal with their messes . I say too much government is making our lives unbearable
ReplyJust park on the street and live there in anything RV,car,truck,tent anything for ever
ReplyAbsolutely disgusting and assured that Counties are fighting this type of solution to extremely high rents and low surplus of affordable housing. I am so very tired of short sighted , uninspired government...both local and federal. We need solutions and Tiny Homes offer a truly viable one.
Replybecause if a 16 year old can enroll into the army, they should at least be able to vote.
ReplyOnly if we bring back civics classes so they understand what they are voting for.
Replykids today are a lot smarter than we were at 16. give 'em a chance to prove themselves.
ReplyThere is a strong case for restoring the voting age to 21 with an exception for individuals serving with the military or who have been honorably discharge
ReplyLiberals have socialist agenda indoctrinating our kids in the school system. They still live under parents roof, wet behind the ears, NO, NO, NO way they should be allowed to vote yet.
ReplyThe age for most activities should be raised, not lowered. Children are still children.
ReplyNO! Children are not taught civics and are too immature. Two basic reasons. It was an idea brought out by politics, not common sense.
ReplyI have a 16 year old. He’s not competent enough to remember to brush his hair and teeth, put deodorant on, put clean clothes on after you shower. No thanks. Leave it to someone who is older.
ReplySome 16 year olds are mature enough to vote but I would say 90% are not. Voting is an important act and has to be considered carefully.
ReplyAt 16 you are to influenced by your peers. At that age you are more concerned with what you will wear out Friday night.
ReplyBecause 16 year olds are not mature enough to be making those kind of decisions.
ReplyOregon leaders, in their infinite wisdom just moved the smoking age to 21, now want 21 to buy firearms, can't sign a contract til 18, nor live on their own. Now they want more voters, soooooo
ReplyAbsolutely not. It has been scientifically proven that brains (reasoning centers) are not fully developed until age 25.
Reply16 is much too young. Wait until they are out of the house and earning their own living. Love their energy and idealism, but needs to be tempered with experience and pragmatism.
ReplyTide pods, condom snorting and common core... I rest my case! Salem doesn't trust people to own a gun until 21, but voting on future policy is fine? Have you met today's teens?
ReplyThey not mature or ready to vote, they still out here doing dumbass challenges like sniffing condoms, go missing for 2 days and eating tide pods.
ReplyYou know, 15 is almost 16, why not them? Drivers license? 15 year olds can get a permit after taking the same test. While were at it, lower the drinking and marijuana ages to 15 also.
ReplyYeah because we all new everything at 16 at least we thought we did. Heck I think its should be raised to 25 that's when you finally figure out you don't know everything
ReplyAt 16 children are vulnerable to peer pressure as well as to people in authority persuading their decisions.
ReplyKids at the age of 16 most likely still live at home with parents, they are not of legal age to make decisions and have not worked full time, paid taxes nor have they paid bills for their own support.
Replynope they shouldn't be given the right to vote, Legally they aren't responsible for their own lives yet, so why should they be given the privilege of controlling the lives of others.
Reply16 year old minds are still developing and changing. No they are barely old enough to know who they are. If you allow them to vote, might as well let them drink, go to war and handle all other adult r
Replyagreed. Wait, they're just kids, you can't expect them to drink and fight. They don't understand the consequences, EXACTLY!
Before you have the privilege of voting, you should have some skin in the game. Like paying taxes. Being old enough to service in the armed forces, be old enough to be accountable for your actions.
ReplyFor heaven's sake! It's all part of the same lefty agenda, just like immigration. Knowing that young people tend to lean liberal it means more Dem votes. They couldn't care less about the kids rights.
ReplyThey're still eating tide pods and burning themselves with erasers and want everything for free are you kidding me it should be raised to 21
ReplyJust because they pay taxes, etc. does not mean they know how to vote.....they don't pay attention and have no interest.
ReplyKids at that age are to vote what parents or other people tell them not using their own mind &/or beliefs. Barely do at 18!!!!!
ReplyDebates and polls on Tinyhomes from the SquareOffs community. Vote on real questions, see how the public is split, and back your side with a defense.
📱 Download the App: iOS
Support Publishers About Blog Shop Facebook Twitter Instagram Privacy Terms Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information Community Guidelines © 2025 SquareOffs Social Polling Platform
We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT