Since when are the answers to the question of the day not"yes" or "no"? Those are the options. And is is exactly that simple. The answers here are an attempt to skew the results. Pathetic.
ReplyNeither are nutritional. Both lead to an increase in diabetes which is running rampant in our youth.
ReplyWhy isn't it set up like the WIC program, where there are only specific approved food items. that can be purchased? It's not rocket science. I know it, you know it, and so does RFK Jr.
ReplyOnly healthy nutritious food should be able to buy with food stamps. Junk food should be abandoned. If junk food is bought with EBTstamps, it should be taxed. Chip, soda, and candy should be taxed. These foods are not nutrition and unhealthy
ReplyPeople are letting their kids grow up on junk. It's not healthy. Another of working people can't afford to buy their kids junk food. I got food stamps in the 70s. We couldn't buy junk food or soda. No prepared foods. No chicken legs or thighs because they cost more. I bought whole chickens an
ReplyThese products are harmful for the body. Useless calories. Drink water, eat fruit. Your body will thank you.
ReplyYes, people are sick of the free handouts, while they have to suffer of go without.
ReplyPeople should get a job !!! It's that simple . But many want to start out at the top or think they are to good to flip burgers . Would rather sit on ass and take handout .
ReplyBecause I receive snap benefits and it makes it hard if they take that out then there taking away most of the food you get on stamps because of sugar is in most of the food.
ReplyIf they that stupid then they need to crack down on people on SSI shouldn't be able to spend their checks on lottery tickets every month! Plain and simple.
ReplyHealthy foods are high price and if they want us to buy more healthy foods, then either need to lower the price for healthy foods or raise the price on food stamps
ReplyThere are people who need soda and candy due to low blood sugar. They should not have to suffer
Replyebt is suppose to be like cash.so...if someone paying cash never suppose to buy a candy bar??? also,if someone asks u for $ for gas and u let them have $ for gas,would u tell them they can only buy premium instead of reg??
ReplyBecause not only are you removing sports drinks but juices in general....also you are telling older adults who payed taxes for year who are now on ssi/ssdi and rely on food stamps that they can't get what they paid for before now just because they are old/disabled .
ReplyNo, because the Diabetic people like myself needs sugar free candy and sugar free soda. I know the government wants everyone to be healthy but we have rights too on what foods to eat.
ReplyI'm not okay with this new thing of the president want to do. Sometimes we need a little sugar for our body etc...hope and pray that they not accepting this please
ReplySugar is a basic food staple, and it is allowed. cokes, and candy is not. Get with the program.
Yes, they, and many other convenience foods should also be excluded. "It's not that simple", is an understatement.
Replybecause if a 16 year old can enroll into the army, they should at least be able to vote.
ReplyOnly if we bring back civics classes so they understand what they are voting for.
Replykids today are a lot smarter than we were at 16. give 'em a chance to prove themselves.
ReplyThere is a strong case for restoring the voting age to 21 with an exception for individuals serving with the military or who have been honorably discharge
ReplyLiberals have socialist agenda indoctrinating our kids in the school system. They still live under parents roof, wet behind the ears, NO, NO, NO way they should be allowed to vote yet.
ReplyThe age for most activities should be raised, not lowered. Children are still children.
ReplyNO! Children are not taught civics and are too immature. Two basic reasons. It was an idea brought out by politics, not common sense.
ReplyI have a 16 year old. He’s not competent enough to remember to brush his hair and teeth, put deodorant on, put clean clothes on after you shower. No thanks. Leave it to someone who is older.
ReplySome 16 year olds are mature enough to vote but I would say 90% are not. Voting is an important act and has to be considered carefully.
ReplyAt 16 you are to influenced by your peers. At that age you are more concerned with what you will wear out Friday night.
ReplyBecause 16 year olds are not mature enough to be making those kind of decisions.
ReplyOregon leaders, in their infinite wisdom just moved the smoking age to 21, now want 21 to buy firearms, can't sign a contract til 18, nor live on their own. Now they want more voters, soooooo
ReplyAbsolutely not. It has been scientifically proven that brains (reasoning centers) are not fully developed until age 25.
Reply16 is much too young. Wait until they are out of the house and earning their own living. Love their energy and idealism, but needs to be tempered with experience and pragmatism.
ReplyTide pods, condom snorting and common core... I rest my case! Salem doesn't trust people to own a gun until 21, but voting on future policy is fine? Have you met today's teens?
ReplyThey not mature or ready to vote, they still out here doing dumbass challenges like sniffing condoms, go missing for 2 days and eating tide pods.
ReplyYou know, 15 is almost 16, why not them? Drivers license? 15 year olds can get a permit after taking the same test. While were at it, lower the drinking and marijuana ages to 15 also.
ReplyYeah because we all new everything at 16 at least we thought we did. Heck I think its should be raised to 25 that's when you finally figure out you don't know everything
ReplyAt 16 children are vulnerable to peer pressure as well as to people in authority persuading their decisions.
ReplyKids at the age of 16 most likely still live at home with parents, they are not of legal age to make decisions and have not worked full time, paid taxes nor have they paid bills for their own support.
Replynope they shouldn't be given the right to vote, Legally they aren't responsible for their own lives yet, so why should they be given the privilege of controlling the lives of others.
Reply16 year old minds are still developing and changing. No they are barely old enough to know who they are. If you allow them to vote, might as well let them drink, go to war and handle all other adult r
Replyagreed. Wait, they're just kids, you can't expect them to drink and fight. They don't understand the consequences, EXACTLY!
Before you have the privilege of voting, you should have some skin in the game. Like paying taxes. Being old enough to service in the armed forces, be old enough to be accountable for your actions.
ReplyFor heaven's sake! It's all part of the same lefty agenda, just like immigration. Knowing that young people tend to lean liberal it means more Dem votes. They couldn't care less about the kids rights.
ReplyThey're still eating tide pods and burning themselves with erasers and want everything for free are you kidding me it should be raised to 21
ReplyJust because they pay taxes, etc. does not mean they know how to vote.....they don't pay attention and have no interest.
ReplyKids at that age are to vote what parents or other people tell them not using their own mind &/or beliefs. Barely do at 18!!!!!
ReplyDebates and polls on Snap from the SquareOffs community. Vote on real questions, see how the public is split, and back your side with a defense.
📱 Download the App: iOS
Support Publishers About Blog Shop Facebook Twitter Instagram Privacy Terms Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information Community Guidelines © 2025 SquareOffs Social Polling Platform
We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT