.png?1683934188 "13 On Your Side")
.jpg?1762493919 "Should the Trump administration fight a judge's order that it fully fund SNAP?")
Because the Republicans want to control the voters instead of the voters controlling the government.
Reply
Every time they have accepted a ceasefire, the enemy has ambushed them again. They need to solve the problem once, and for all.
Reply
The Supreme Court basically chose not to directly make a decision, rather handing back to the lower courts.
Reply
I just figured whatever the lockstep, goose-stepping media is always wrong about what is true. and I am rarely disappointed.
Reply
It was the correct action despite the liberal Justices. As the final arbiter of the law, the Court is charged with ensuring the American people the promise of equal justice under law and, thereby, also functions as guardian and interpreter of the Constitution.
Reply
Debates and polls on Parson from the SquareOffs community. Vote on real questions, see how the public is split, and back your side with a defense.
📱 Download the App: iOS
Support Publishers About Blog Shop Facebook Twitter Instagram Privacy Terms Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information Community Guidelines © 2025 SquareOffs Social Polling Platform
Asked by
It's too easy under current law.
ReplyIt should be made more difficult to amend, this will preserve it's strength.
Reply