Guns SquareOffs

Yes

0

No

6

Yes

No one has commented yet

No

Will Mason
4
Will Mason

If they did what they think it will sure, but it won't. It will cost money and prevent nothing. Growing government is bad mmmkay.

Reply
John Deakins
3
John Deakins

Will not change anything, a waste of taxpayer money. How long have we tried to prevent spousal abuse with counseling, arrests, etc and it does not stop.

Reply
Steve Baumann
1
Steve Baumann

We need less government. It's not working, it's not the answer. Defund the bureaucracy, not the police

Reply
Bill Douglas
0
Bill Douglas

The state needs a program to prevent UM engineering school techno-nerd graduates from getting jobs synchronizing stoplights and designing things like roundabouts etc And keep their flag burning anti-American “new innovative road designs” out of Republican counties in Missouri. LOCK THEM UP!!

Reply
Max
0
Max

Columbia has a Police Department. If the prosecutor and the courts supported them, crime would decrease a great deal.

Reply

Yes

1

No

8

Yes

Elissa MacLachlan
0
Elissa MacLachlan

Rights need to be coupled with a responsibility to everyone in a community.

Reply

No

Marcus Ainsworth
2
Marcus Ainsworth

its called the 2nd Amendment to the CONSTITUTION

Reply
Mary M
2
Mary M

It goes against our 2nd amendment rights. And it is a very small portion of legal gun owners use it on others. Most or all that use it on others are because of mental illness, which is where more help is needed rather than taking away people's rights.

Reply
BOB RADA
2
BOB RADA

The crazy left do-gooders have no more common sense than the snowflakes running our country. Guns are not the problem. The far left is.

Reply
Rick Allen
1
Rick Allen

No it is backwards. It will create major problems for police to initiate, it will not stop any gun violence. It is pro criminal and against honest citizens. Criminals and crazy kids will not obey any gun laws. Gun free zones are in realty a target rich environment. We need more concealed carry.

Reply
Chad Hodges
1
Chad Hodges

I say no to this because the gun are not the issue. It's the folks that are able to get them. There's gotta be another way to get control something like stronger fredral background checks if we let the federal government get full control of us having guns we won't have guns at all. So let's vote

Reply
Latterdaysaint
1
Latterdaysaint

It's unconstitutional, more security not gun control

Reply
Mark Mueller
0
Mark Mueller

It is a violation of our 2nd Amendment Rights.

Reply
Kimmy Wasatch
0
Kimmy Wasatch

Not only is it against our rights but guns are not the problem. The left liberals that defunded police, allowed riots, decriminalized drugs, do not hold criminals accountable are the problem. Until those responsible are voted out of office, nothing will change.

Reply

48%
Yes

2

52%
No WINNER

4

48%
Yes

Shari Taylor
0
Shari Taylor

He shot the boy because he was black. If the boy was white we would not be having a debate right now. He should be charged with attempted murder.

Reply

52%
No

Frank Stoner
1
Frank Stoner

KMIZ and other news media are not bothering to inform the public that Lester is an 84-year-old dementia patient.

Reply
Vernon Taylor
1
Vernon Taylor

Everyone who wasn't there is now an eyewitness expert.

Reply

About Guns

Debates and polls on Guns from the SquareOffs community. Vote on real questions, see how the public is split, and back your side with a defense.

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT