Waira

Waira

I love music, sports, and everything nerdy
Should severe violators of stay-at-home orders be arrested?
Waira Asked by Waira
6998 Votes

Should severe violators of stay-at-home orders be arrested?

I think so..

62

Not justified..

47

I think so..

62 Comments
Aleen Smith
4
Aleen Smith

They put others at risk. Not okay.

Reply
Devonjdoyle
2
Devonjdoyle

Because it is severe violations not just violations

Reply
Keegan McGinnis
1
Keegan McGinnis

They endanger everyone else and should be held accountable for that. They should be charged with manslaughter. This needs to be taken seriously, especially by the president, who is encouraging this!

Reply
Tuan Anh Tran
1
Tuan Anh Tran

No point if the world pandemic is playing around.

Reply
Sam Murphy
1
Sam Murphy

therere people DYING unless u HAVE to see another person, they should be punished This is a serious situation and I know people who have lost loved ones and couldn’t even say goodbye bc of ignorance.

Reply
super unicum
1
super unicum

Because this pandemic is serious, we need to stop the spread, it's unfair to the people who stay home and see others still going out.

Reply
john rathsam
1
john rathsam

I think they should be arrested because violators are pretty much lengthening a pandemic and are killing people in a way.

Reply
Marveth Lovina
1
Marveth Lovina

They are not only risking themselves but others too. Contagion is fast and invisible.

Reply
Will Daugherty
1
Will Daugherty

People should be locked up and their assets sold and proceeds donated to the ATF, DEA, and FBI. We should also burn the Constitution, including its amendments, because that’s the only it’s legal.

Reply
selvin Garcia
1
selvin Garcia

Some people aren’t taking this serious. This is very serious! You could be infected and not know it. The more people out, the more time we’ll have to be stuck indoors.

Reply
Fruity McMuffin
1
Fruity McMuffin

people who have the balls to just go out and take a dump on everyone else’s efforts to do their part is inexcusable. These people are making this whole ordeal more drawn out for ALL of us.

Reply
Tanson Take
1
Tanson Take

The virus would not spread faster if we just stayed in our homes. Like I understand the need to go to work but walking around outside for fun come on man

Reply
nicolas camacho
1
nicolas camacho

We need to stop the virus. Think about everybody else around you. Be a hero. Stay home

Reply
Doctor Piggy
1
Doctor Piggy

Drastic times call for drastic measures. Some people are selfish enough to care more about their enjoyment than the well-being of others. We need to put an end to this so that we can solve this issue.

Reply
Anna Brewster
1
Anna Brewster

I think the only way to get over this quickly is if everyone listens. People not listening are being selfish and there needs to be consequences or it just won’t make a difference.

Reply
Soph Calese
0
Soph Calese

They may not care themselves. But they know that they could be putting others (especially with compromised health) in danger by helping to spread the virus when violating quarantine rules

Reply
David Gardner
0
David Gardner

Although it's really nice to get out and spend time with people, what's a higher priorty: Your personal wants or lowering the risk of people catching this virus thay are more likely to die from it?

Reply
Thomas Morey
0
Thomas Morey

This entire situation is a crisis that will only be solved if we all work together. Every single person on the planet, or someone they love, has a pre-existing condition making COVID-19 lethal to them

Reply
M3rc
0
M3rc

Because we need to be protecting our people of this country the best we can. Yes it’s a right to be able to go into public, however in this circumstance there are certain measures that we need to take

Reply
Anthony Yearego
0
Anthony Yearego

Bc there being stupid there gonna spread it more like I hate being at home all the time so damn much but our lives are more important!!!!

Reply
Omar Hoyos
0
Omar Hoyos

Human life is more valuable than money

Reply
Julius Briscoe
0
Julius Briscoe

They’re endangering everyone around them, especially the extremely young, old, and immunocompromised. They’re glorified new wave anti-vaxxers

Reply
lol okay
0
lol okay

they put other people’s lives at risk for seeing friends, or unneeded activities. people are having to leave their dying mother or father, or CHILDREN in the hospital by themselves to die.

Reply
Claire
0
Claire

Reckless endangerment, includes this i think because they are are bienf irresponsible In risk of other people lives but we might not have have enough jail space considering there is so many violator

Reply
anthony reyes
0
anthony reyes

Because it is not only endangering yourself but endangering others and this will only lead to more infection. People need to stop being self centered, selfish, and entitled. This bigger than everyone.

Reply
Diego Galicia
0
Diego Galicia

They should be arrested, name taken down, and then sent home, if they violate it again, they they get jail

Reply
Chris Ammann
0
Chris Ammann

It’s for people’s health and safety. Being in New York and seeing the amount of death that took place and how it’s being managed through social distancing, it shows the positive impacts of distancing.

Reply
Fay Kern
0
Fay Kern

It really depends on the situation, if they’re out all day and ignoring the stay at home order all together then yes

Reply
James Bond
0
James Bond

Anyone violating the orders is spreading the disease, which leads to more people being infected, more deaths, and a longer stay at home order

Reply
Mememan
0
Mememan

They are knowingly endangering themselves and those around them, isn’t that technically assault

Reply
XYourEpicFailX1
0
XYourEpicFailX1

These people are disobeying a goverment order, and endangering other people, therefore by disobeying a goverment order they are defying the law. and by endangering people is almost like terrosism

Reply
Ryan Krasowski
Ryan Krasowski

A Gov’t order is a far stretch from a law. They could be fined, but never arrested

Joyce Cortez
0
Joyce Cortez

honestly everything would go back to normal if these people stopped going outside.. punishing them for things they shouldn’t be doing? justifiable enough.

Reply
Alexander Romanov
0
Alexander Romanov

This is why, if a person is robbing a bank then they are putting those hostages in danger, and if you replace the bank robbing scenario with people with covid then they are putting people in danger

Reply
Big Meech
0
Big Meech

America is in a state of emergency, these stay at home orders are put in place for a good reason, and those who violate them not only put themselves at risk, but all those they come into contact with

Reply
oh worm
0
oh worm

They’re putting themselves and other people at risk by refusing to stay home. Their actions are selfish and could spread the disease further, which could kill someone and cause them to be responsible.

Reply
Filore Umarjan
0
Filore Umarjan

People are just too selfish and not Cooperating with the rest who is trying to Cooperate. It’s not fair for the rest. Should teach them a lesson.

Reply
Ari Leon
0
Ari Leon

Putting the public at risk

Reply

Not justified..

47 Comments
Jake Soelberg
3
Jake Soelberg

It against the Constitution. We have the freedom to peacefully assemble even during a pandemic. It isn’t up to the government to go against the constitution

Reply
lol okay
lol okay

we may have freedoms but people are having to be left in the hospital to die alone because of how serious this illness is. don’t be stupid.

Tim Barber
2
Tim Barber

Not the government's place.

Reply
nathan rybner
1
nathan rybner

Because we live in a free country, American blood wasn’t spilled fighting nazis and communists for their authoritarian beliefs to reign supreme over the US in a “crisis”.

Reply
Salem Bond
1
Salem Bond

We should recommend that people stay home but when forced is when it becomes unconstitutional. When that happens more will choose not to follow the stay at home order.

Reply
Paul Kaminski
1
Paul Kaminski

It’s a violation of many rights you are entitled to. It might be reckless but it isn’t illegal and you shouldn’t be arrested for it or fined as that would probably promote the gov’t to limit rights

Reply
Alex Boreman
1
Alex Boreman

If the government can take our freedoms every time they say there’s an emergency, then we have permissions, not freedoms.

Reply
Driftforce YT
Driftforce YT

It’s a pandemic, the government has the right to keep people indoors. It’s also the people’s responsibility to stay home to slow the spread of a lethal virus.

Todd TAFT
1
Todd TAFT

The whole quarantine is BS. How about we actually quarantine the people at risk? Elderly, people with existing health issues, ect. Let the healthy who won't die get infected to build up antibodies.

Reply
Austin Wills
Austin Wills

There is no evidence that people will develop immunity once infected with the virus and recovered. And there are plenty of people who don't even realize that they are immunocompromised.

dan bob
1
dan bob

These “orders” are absolutely unconstitutional and a crime in and of itself. This reaction to COVID-19 only goes to show how much of our freedom the government can take with only a little fear. 💯🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

Reply
James Bond
James Bond

2,000,000+ cases and about 150K deaths is not a little bit of fear. That’s a pandemic, and it will play out as it did during the Bubonic Plague, the Cholera Outbreak, and the Spanish Flu

Cringe Crewism 101
Cringe Crewism 101

It’s because a lot of America is stupid and don’t know there rights. Probably 50% of the people hear have the same mind as cardi b

Maaster El-Guarto
1
Maaster El-Guarto

It’s like freedom of assembly. Also, like, it’s their choice.

Reply
James Bond
James Bond

Everyone is so full of themselves with “freedom this” and “freedom that” that you ignore the fact that some things have to be taken away for the safety of humanity

Rebecca Wright
0
Rebecca Wright

Go catch real criminals and stop violating Constitutional rights to the pursuit of life, liberty and happiness... so stated in Constitution. STOP BEING THE NAZI GESTAPO!!

Reply
Thenick hood
0
Thenick hood

The government is not a parent figure and my rights don’t stop existing because of a “crisis” me going outside only puts you at risk if you are outside as well so if you’re worried about it stay home.

Reply
Kyle Nie
0
Kyle Nie

Because we have the right to not stay home. There is no law saying we have to stay home. Even I’m getting cabin fever because I haven’t been outside for months

Reply
Ben Hanson
0
Ben Hanson

Bc fuck the government Quarantine this dick fedbois This isn’t about a virus anymore it’s about control

Reply
daniel carter
0
daniel carter

We’re tired of staying inside so we go out and exercise so we don’t get fat

Reply
anthony reyes
anthony reyes

You can exercise in ur home or backyard.

The buttery toster
0
The buttery toster

They’d just fucking let them out of jail like they are for a bunch of criminals now

Reply
Cringe Crewism 101
0
Cringe Crewism 101

It goes against the right to assemble in the 1st amendment and violates article 1 of the 14th. The states which closed bars violates the 22 as well.

Reply
anthony reyes
anthony reyes

It’s sad how entitled and self absorbed you are that you can’t cooperate for even a little amount of time to stop the spread and help save people’s lives.

Nate Dog
0
Nate Dog

It would violate our rights. Per 14th amendment, with regards to Michigan taking clause from the 5th amendment comes into play.

Reply
Driftforce YT
Driftforce YT

The government has the right to order all residents to stay home in a time of crisis. Unfortunately some people are to arrogant and self centered to obey gov orders and stay home

Paul Hammond
0
Paul Hammond

It’s unconstitutional

Reply
Austin Wills
Austin Wills

Once marshal law comes into play, that won’t matter

Noah Iglesias
0
Noah Iglesias

There is not enough space inside prisons as it is and they are not kept under great conditions. This would spread the virus more. Instead of arresting there could be a fine or warning.

Reply
Nathan Trigo
0
Nathan Trigo

People need there freedom if they aren’t infected,qaurintine is to prevent the infectious people from getting around slavery is to keep all in

Reply
James Bond
James Bond

Quarantine is to prevent people from getting the virus. If all the “healthy” people go outside, a lot of them will get the virus unknowingly and spread it to all the other people

Nigera Willman
0
Nigera Willman

A humans basic rights shouldn’t be taken or way or at least heavily regulated. It’s called freedom; people’s ignorance shouldn’t be the excuse for heavy government control over the lives of its people

Reply
James Bond
James Bond

That “people’s ignorance” has lead to over 150,000 people dying so far. If people are allowed to go out, that will go to the millions

Jack Symington
0
Jack Symington

4 words. The Bill Of Rights

Reply
James Bond
James Bond

2 Words: Global Pandemic

Cringe Crewism 101
Cringe Crewism 101

Mr James Bond, your death count numbers are wrong. In fact most deaths have been counted as though let’s say the person died really from cancer, but had covid in the background. That’s now a cov death

wtf am i
0
wtf am i

this is a country of freedom of we get arrested for being outside what next? they will arrest us for speaking out against the tyrannical government

Reply
James Bond
James Bond

Going outside puts you, your family, and everyone else you go near at risk of death. It’s for the safety of humanity, not a method of control

Danny Sparks
0
Danny Sparks

I don’t think it’s justified because you are well aware of the risk you’re taking, so punishing those who gather would just cause more fear in the public than anything else. Recommendation not control

Reply
Sam Murphy
Sam Murphy

it’s not just a risk for people going out, it’s a public danger and people continue to do it. it would be great if ppl were smart enough to stay inside

Isaiah Remole
0
Isaiah Remole

The first amendment (among other things) prohibits the gov. from preventing “the right of the people to peaceably assemble” I think its foolish to go out, but it’s not their job to make it illegal.

Reply
James Bond
James Bond

If you “peacefully assemble”, you will get infected, infect others, and possibly be the cause of somebody’s death

Cringe Crewism 101
Cringe Crewism 101

James man, what if I had the flu and gave it to someone and they died. This happens to almost 40,000 Americans a year already and the economy continues. Flu is also one of those that kill the young.

Dylan Alves
0
Dylan Alves

If people who have covid are arrested without being tested then people who are apart of the task force and their families and the people who are arrested Are likely to get covid they should be fined

Reply
John Anderson
0
John Anderson

Let people choose their safety. Imprisoning people for not staying home is pathetic. People will eventually have mental breakdowns and family problems. It’s better to advise rather than force.

Reply
Nathan Cullen
0
Nathan Cullen

I believe that some form of punishment for endangering the public health is good. However, arresting violators infringes upon rights of individual citizens more than it helps the common good.

Reply
Ryan Krasowski
0
Ryan Krasowski

That is the most ridiculous thing ever. Massive waste of police time and resources and money. Plus it is not possible to arrest them because by law, they have not committed any crime.

Reply
Driftforce YT
Driftforce YT

They could be arrested for public endangerment

Robert Griffith
0
Robert Griffith

Just a warning should suffice

Reply
Driftforce YT
Driftforce YT

Some people don’t listen to warnings. A punishment needs to be in place for any violators of the stay at home order

Ben was here
0
Ben was here

People need to be able to shop at the grocery or even eat out to still be able to put money into the economy so it won’t totally collapse they are just putting themselves at risk so just let them

Reply
william hewitt
0
william hewitt

People are entitled to what they want to do . The govt has too much control over people

Reply
J Swan
0
J Swan

The government shouldn’t have the power to force people to stay inside or anything of that nature no matter the cost.

Reply
Driftforce YT
Driftforce YT

That’s stupid, Stay at home orders are in place and the death toll is only rising. If there was no stay at home order, the death toll would be through the roof

ImpalaLord
0
ImpalaLord

Freedom of assembly, as much as it sucks that people are breaking quarantine, it would be infringement upon a constitutional right to stop them

Reply
oh worm
oh worm

Bruh lmao. The constitution doesnt mean anything in this situation because people’s lives are at risk. “ThE coNstiTuTioN sAys We HavE a RiGhT—“ such a selfish argument in a time like this

Gregory DeMayo
0
Gregory DeMayo

The government cannot blame an individual for not staying home. How can we be expected to pay our bills when jobless? It would be easier to stay at home if we didn't have to worry about money.

Reply
oh worm
oh worm

This poll is talking about people that ignore the government’s demands to stay home to have fun and do what they want. Going outside to make money or provide for your needs is excusable.

Joshua Youngerman
0
Joshua Youngerman

Ok. Now I think if you were to throw a huge event with 20+ ppl. Then yah. But not if you are just going out and living your life

Reply
oh worm
oh worm

Then why vote for this side

Adrian Funes
0
Adrian Funes

Why would you charge someone for not staying home ? That’s like charging someone for exercising there right ? You can’t take a citizens rights

Reply
oh worm
oh worm

going to social gatherings despite being told to stay home by the government is also an infringement of other people’s rights. By not staying home, you’re putting others at a large risk.

Andrew Cox
0
Andrew Cox

People have to work in order to obtain money. If you can’t get money you can’t get food. That’s forced starvation

Reply
oh worm
oh worm

Bruh they never said you cant go outside for food. You can’t go outside for fun is what it means. Social gatherings are a no-no.

Mitchell Fountain
0
Mitchell Fountain

You can’t force someone to stay at home when they either need to make money, get food, etc. Especially if they aren’t an at risk person, they take the risk of getting corona or not

Reply
NJTP 22
0
NJTP 22

Arresting people usually doesn’t work. It just makes people angry so they will rebel and do it again. Fines for whoever held the party are a better idea

Reply
Daniel C
0
Daniel C

Yes, the right thing to do is to self quarantine. However, someone leaving there house when they aren’t supposed to is not grounds for arrest. Citizens should not be arrested for leaving there house.

Reply
oh worm
oh worm

SEVERE violators. As in, people who go outside to party and have fun. Not people who go outside to get groceries.

Eugene Harold 'Armor Abs' Krabs
0
Eugene Harold 'Armor Abs' Krabs

The government should not and does not have the right for arresting people who are expressing their freedom to assemble. The government should only put in place a strong recommendation to stay home.

Reply
oh worm
oh worm

Assemblies infringe on other people’s rights in this type of situation. it puts other people in danger. I have the right to remain healthy and you being selfish & throwing a party infringes on that.

Who would you rather have as your survival guide?

Who would you rather have as your survival guide?

Dwight Schrute

0

Ron Swanson

1

Dwight Schrute

0 Comments
No one has commented yet

Ron Swanson

1 Comment
Jeff Rohr
1
Jeff Rohr

Dwight would have some brilliant ideas … just not sure you could trust them all.

Reply
Do you think we'll see characters from Marvel's What If...? in upcoming MCU phases?

Do you think we'll see characters from Marvel's What If...? in upcoming MCU phases?

Yup, Multiverse

5

No, What If..? is just for fun

1

Yup, Multiverse

5 Comments
Matthew Hale
1
Matthew Hale

they've pretty much all but said so already. the introduction of Dr strange in what if made a clear window in which the "multiverse of madness" can jump thru. they have shown us every possible "avenger" they could without coming right out and saying "this is the new team".

Reply
Soul Provider Reacts
1
Soul Provider Reacts

since they confirmed it's Canon there is a possibility

Reply
Waira
Waira

If you had to pick one variant from all the characters we've seen so far, who would it be?

Brian Klein
1
Brian Klein

I hoping to see Jeffrey Wright play a live action Uatu.

Reply

No, What If..? is just for fun

1 Comment
Patrick Stewart
1
Patrick Stewart

I am hoping it’s just for fun. MCU is going to t too unwieldy if they try to bring all of this to big screen. Too much of a good thing and all.

Reply
Waira
Waira

Yeah, they have so much going on.. all of the Disney+ series, plus Cheng Chi and so much more. Although, I would love to see some cameos if there's every a chaotic multiverse sequence.

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT