Asked by Husker Max

10/28/2015

Who would you prefer in the Big Ten?

53%

Kansas WINNER

47%

Kansas State

53%

Kansas

16 Comments

Casey Henman

Kansas St will be terrible when Snyder retires again.

Mark Camero

basketball

Rodger Alan Hergenrader

Academic quality

David Gaspers

KU is the better fit culturally and academically.

Mike Remerowski

I vote neither. None of them stick with us against Texa$, so why should we help them out. I vote OU so we get our true rival who I respect and would prefer Texa$ or TCU over either Kansas school

Katie Swoboda

Much larger endowment

Jim Martin

Fit. And would twist the knife just that much more into Mizzou's back. Schadenfreude!

Mako Evony

Classier institution academically.

Alan Poe

Kansas is academically-focused with research and prestige. KSU, well, belongs in the Big 12. :-)

Keith Petrie

Actually neither! We don't need more teams in the conference.

Jerry Williams

they bring solid basketball. It might help their football

Randy Henkel

Lousy

Manuel Jimenez

Kansas has more prestige. K St has never won either in football or basketball.

Alan J Farrell

Bring basketball

47%

Kansas State

8 Comments

Cheryl Bell

better competition

Visitor

anyone other than Nebraska!!

Derek Johnson

Better FB

John Sorensen

Because Oklahoma wasn't an option on this vote

Visitor

Football

Phil Coffey

Better football program

Ronald D. Bull

I agree with the first commit.

Brian Wallace

More consistent in football and can be competitive in basketball.

What should define Nebraska’s running back room heading into 2026?

Asked by Husker Max

2 months left

What should define Nebraska’s running back room heading into 2026?

69%

One clear feature back One clear feature back

31%

A situational committee A situational committee

69%

One clear feature back

3 Comments

David Weaver

Feature back is important to have but DEPTH is also CRITICAL. If don't have a feature back then either then depth chart is flooded with talent. But in the Big Ten you better have a GREAT 2nd and 3rd string to make it through the season. With EJ it helped he was so quick he didn't take huge hits

Terry Barker

Nebraska was always most stable when we had a feature back that can actually "carry" the team with his legs.

Ron Joseph

Nebraska in the past was successful with one top back. We've fallen on hard times because we haven't developed or recruited a great back. But the others need to be developed so we have a pipeline of backs like we use to have.

31%

A situational committee

4 Comments

Thomas Wright

Roger Craig & Tom Rathman ring a bell ? Not only a dynamic duo playing for NU, but also for the 49ers !! YES we want multiple RB’s to rotate in & out to keep their legs fresh!! GBR 🎈

SEW

Look at the success in the playoff, the teams have 2-3 capable RB's they use to keep them healthy and offer the D different looks. Johnson was unique, most backs can't take that many snaps a season and stay healthy and sharp.

PJ SAid

Every good team, including the NFL, will rotate backs on a regular basis. This last year Nebraska should have used a 2nd running back more often - NEB is lucked out EJ stayed healthy.