Husker Max

Husker Max

huskermax.com
Everything you ever wanted to know about the Huskers www.huskermax.com
Husker Max Asked by Husker Max
7/10/2014

Which rival would you most like to beat?

78%
Oklahoma WINNER

6

22%
Iowa

3

78%
Oklahoma

Which rival would you most like to beat?
One more win for old times sake plus revenge for the 3 point loss the last time the two teams played in 2010.
One more win for old times sake plus revenge for the 3 point loss the last time the two teams played in 2010. Show Less
6 Comments
Rizeabuv Yorzelf
2
Rizeabuv Yorzelf

what would you rather drive: Ferrari or Buick?

Reply
Terri Fisher
0
Terri Fisher

Because they were our best rival

Reply
Arlie Rauch
0
Arlie Rauch

They were classy rivals.

Reply
Rick Jameson
0
Rick Jameson

Cause Iowa isn't a rivalry

Reply
Andrew Epp
0
Andrew Epp

It had been going longer. The history of all the great games passed. Can't beat the feeling of beating Oklahoma.

Reply
Robert Phillips
0
Robert Phillips

Sooners or Hawkeyes? Hands down OU. I am one Husker fan who actually likes OU. Never have liked Iowa.

Reply

22%
Iowa

Which rival would you most like to beat?
Revenge for last season plus bring the Heroes Trophy back to Lincoln.
Revenge for last season plus bring the Heroes Trophy back to Lincoln. Show Less
3 Comments
R.S.P.
5
R.S.P.

I can handle losing to the Sooners better than I can the losing to the Hawkeyes

Reply
jd
0
jd

OU at least gets respect nationally, when we lose to Iowa it's a black eye to us.

Reply
Dalynn Parks
0
Dalynn Parks

I hate Iowa.........

Reply
Is Nebraska's offensive line improving?
Husker Max Asked by Husker Max
15 Votes

Is Nebraska's offensive line improving?

They're getting better.

0

Needs more work.

0

They're getting better.

0 Comment
No one has commented yet

Needs more work.

0 Comment
No one has commented yet
Thoughts on Nebraska's offensive strategy shift?
Husker Max Asked by Husker Max
719 Votes

Thoughts on Nebraska's offensive strategy shift?

Exciting change for better

8

Skeptical of sudden shift

3

Exciting change for better

7 Comments
Don Buckingham
0
Don Buckingham

Glad to see an acknowledgement that the O wasn't working. This shows some urgency about winning which I appreciate.

Reply
Bill Greim
0
Bill Greim

Seems pretty obvious that when something is not working very well and you don’t know how to fix it you bring in outside experts for advise. Common practice.

Reply
Brad Bredenkamp
0
Brad Bredenkamp

Holgerson has enough experience that he should be able to watch some film and the players in practice and call plays that play to their strengths. I'm betting he is also smart enough to stick with what's working until the other team stops it, and to develop some offensive rhythm.

Reply
Robert Lloyd
0
Robert Lloyd

Anything is better than Satterfield. But I don't know why we didn't go after the US Army's OC who only makes $190k and absolutely knows how to run the ball.

Reply
Brad Bredenkamp
Brad Bredenkamp

Because Army's OC can call the triple option and run the ball, but he probably doesn't know how to call for a pro-style quarterback. Plus it is very unlikely that Army's OC is going to jump ship right now the way their season is going. Maybe gets a look after the season if Holgerson doesn't stay.

Dick Plock
0
Dick Plock

Needed change for quite a many games. Our offensive & defense coordinators are being out smarted.

Reply
Jean McGee
0
Jean McGee

Satt has been wasting Raiola’s passing strength.

Reply

Skeptical of sudden shift

3 Comments
VAHuskerFan
1
VAHuskerFan

I refuse to get my hopes up

Reply
Craig S
1
Craig S

Installing a whole new offense would be very difficult. You might be able to refine a small portion but learning the timing and terminology would be difficult.

Reply
michael daly
0
michael daly

The habits of almost 2 years don't change overnight. That being said, A new , more forceful, high expectation coach, might be able to snap them awake and Go

Reply

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT