Asked by Husker Max

2/16/2015

Should Richie Incognito have gotten another shot in the NFL?

78%

Yes WINNER

22%

No

78%

Yes

8 Comments

Gearld Wolff

If Ray Lewis, Josh Gordon, Ray Rice, and Adrian Peterson are all people who have been or are going to get second chances, why not.

Kim Thomas Fjellin

YES.. Why is this even a Poll Question?

Zach Akin

If Michael Vick gets a shot Incognito does. He should pay for his mistakes and be on a tight leash but he deserves a shot.

Bart Burroughs

it's the entertainment industry, as long as they don't commit a felony, and you are willing to deal with the high maintenance, give them as many chances as you like. Now when it comes to hall of fame, that is a totally different story.

Jim Jones

It's the NFL...they thrive on giving second chances.

Bob Lines

Two words.....Ray Lewis!

Warren Hoesing

If you fired all the "bullies" in the NFL we'd be watching the cheerleaders....wait hmmmmm

Robert Lloyd

He's not a murderer, is he?

22%

No

2 Comments

Josh Stevens

Just because the NFL has made mistakes and let others have another chance doesn't me the NFL should continue making the same mistake. Making millions playing a game is not right, it is a privilege!

Wally Younger

enough is enough. This guy needs medical help.After treatment I would say yes but not now.

Asked by Husker Max

34 Votes

Is Nebraska's offensive line improving?

50%

They're getting better. They're getting better.

50%

Needs more work. Needs more work.

50%

They're getting better.

0 Comment

No one has commented yet

50%

Needs more work.

0 Comment

No one has commented yet

Thoughts on Nebraska's offensive strategy shift?

Asked by Husker Max

719 Votes

Thoughts on Nebraska's offensive strategy shift?

69%

Exciting change for better Exciting change for better

31%

Skeptical of sudden shift Skeptical of sudden shift

69%

Exciting change for better

7 Comments

Don Buckingham

Glad to see an acknowledgement that the O wasn't working. This shows some urgency about winning which I appreciate.

Bill Greim

Seems pretty obvious that when something is not working very well and you don’t know how to fix it you bring in outside experts for advise. Common practice.

Brad Bredenkamp

Holgerson has enough experience that he should be able to watch some film and the players in practice and call plays that play to their strengths. I'm betting he is also smart enough to stick with what's working until the other team stops it, and to develop some offensive rhythm.

Robert Lloyd

Anything is better than Satterfield. But I don't know why we didn't go after the US Army's OC who only makes $190k and absolutely knows how to run the ball.

Brad Bredenkamp

Because Army's OC can call the triple option and run the ball, but he probably doesn't know how to call for a pro-style quarterback. Plus it is very unlikely that Army's OC is going to jump ship right now the way their season is going. Maybe gets a look after the season if Holgerson doesn't stay.

Dick Plock

Needed change for quite a many games. Our offensive & defense coordinators are being out smarted.

Jean McGee

Satt has been wasting Raiola’s passing strength.

klirvine@bresnan.net

we need an offence

31%

Skeptical of sudden shift

3 Comments

VAHuskerFan

I refuse to get my hopes up

Craig S

Installing a whole new offense would be very difficult. You might be able to refine a small portion but learning the timing and terminology would be difficult.

michael daly

The habits of almost 2 years don't change overnight. That being said, A new , more forceful, high expectation coach, might be able to snap them awake and Go

Husker Max

Should Richie Incognito have gotten another shot in the NFL?

78% Yes WINNER

22% No

78% Yes

22% No

Is Nebraska's offensive line improving?

50% They're getting better. They're getting better.

50% Needs more work. Needs more work.

50% They're getting better.

50% Needs more work.

Thoughts on Nebraska's offensive strategy shift?

69% Exciting change for better Exciting change for better

31% Skeptical of sudden shift Skeptical of sudden shift

69% Exciting change for better

31% Skeptical of sudden shift

78%

Yes WINNER

22%

No

78%

Yes

22%

No

50%

They're getting better. They're getting better.

50%

Needs more work. Needs more work.

50%

They're getting better.

50%

Needs more work.

69%

Exciting change for better Exciting change for better

31%

Skeptical of sudden shift Skeptical of sudden shift

69%

Exciting change for better

31%

Skeptical of sudden shift