Husker Max

Husker Max

huskermax.com
Everything you ever wanted to know about the Huskers www.huskermax.com
Do you think the Big 10 should make any conference alignment changes in response to the SEC moves?

Do you think the Big 10 should make any conference alignment changes in response to the SEC moves?

No hurry, just select high quality

3

Go big because the SEC is coming

12

No hurry, just select high quality

3 Comments
Robert Lloyd
1
Robert Lloyd

Make Barry Alvarez the Big 10 commissioner and surround him with good advisors and go from there. We can't lose with that. Don't strike out and add things without a top team in place to make the decisions.

Reply
Brandon Rolf
0
Brandon Rolf

Kansas and Iowa State...Kansas obviously strong in basketball and has numerous other athletic programs. Iowa State strong wrestling and doesn't have baseball therefore we back to an even amount of teams. Kick Purdue over to the east to be with Indiana full time.

Reply
Douglas Norman
0
Douglas Norman

If B1G can get good traditional football powers, then they should do it. I’m talking teams I with the academic standard they require and are good too. I’d even expand out to PAC12 and down to ACC. See if Notre Dame would reconsider. USC? UCLA, Stanford?

Reply

Go big because the SEC is coming

11 Comments
Steve Sexton
3
Steve Sexton

The Big 10 conference officials would be fools to assume the SEC has not already at least contacted Ohio State, Penn State and Michigan regarding joining. The only way to remain a viable conference long-term is to form a super conference to match the SEC's intentions. Strike from a position of power

Reply
Nick Tempo
Nick Tempo

It will be a cold day in hell before OSU and Michigan or any of the other original 10 depart for the SEC. I don't know what the loyalties are of the newer members, but I'm going to guess that they are also happy where they are as long as the money continues to flow.

Randy Weitzenkamp
1
Randy Weitzenkamp

Things appear to be moving fast and we certainly don't want to be on the outside looking in.

Reply
David Jorgensen
1
David Jorgensen

I say go to 20 teams by adding WA*, OR*, USC*, TCU, ASU, and either Okie St or CO*. Go two 10 team divisions playing round robin and two cross-over (11 total conference games) and 1 non-con. Just don't leave ourselves out of the south market! I don't acre about the AAU*.

Reply
G N
1
G N

you snooze you loose

Reply
Toby Leach
0
Toby Leach

We can enhance the conference by adding quality programs. Would love to see ND, KU, and say bye to Rutgers and Maryland. Add a couple other teams that make sense too.

Reply
Doug Miller
0
Doug Miller

Better make the move now.

Reply
Nick Tempo
0
Nick Tempo

Texas and Oklahoma maybe big name brands, but I don't think Texas is as big of a deal as they seem to think they are. Seriously, what has Texas ever done? They are an underachiever and they will continue to underachieve in the SEC. As for Oklahoma? I see them as being another LSU.

Reply
Ron Joseph
0
Ron Joseph

Yes, we have to go big - Go after the top 6 Pac 12 schools I can live wt Kansas if the Big 10 can convinced Norte Dame to join. If not, go after the Pac 12. Then let the orphan 8 & rest of Pac 12 form a conference

Reply
Mike Di Mauro
0
Mike Di Mauro

Merge the PAC, grab IA ST, Kan, Kan ST TX T from the Big 12, raid the ACC of Clemson and Notre Dame. You then have 32 teams. Use the NFL model You can beat the SEC and then have in one division a Penn St vs Clemson, a Notre Dame vs Ohio St, Oregon vs Michigan.

Reply
Travis Kreifels
0
Travis Kreifels

I like the idea of adding the 9 AAU schools: Arizona, UCLA, USC, Cal, Stanford, Oregon, Washington, Utah and Colorado. I'd then add 1 more team (ND??). 6 4 team pods. play your pod and two other pods for 11 games plus one non conference. should play all teams twice in 5 years.

Reply
Does Nebraska’s collapse vs Minnesota signal a bigger issue?

Does Nebraska’s collapse vs Minnesota signal a bigger issue?

Yes — this feels like the same old story

7

No — just a rough game, no trend

3

Yes — this feels like the same old story

7 Comments
Don Mailliard
1
Don Mailliard

Need a new offensive line coach

Reply
Arthur Cayette
1
Arthur Cayette

Finally Nebraska sport writers are taking off their rose glasses and viewing the Line issues which has been growing (girth not strength) since Solich days when I saw the first fat lineman.

Reply
Robert Lloyd
0
Robert Lloyd

Dana Holgorson doesn't know what a run first offense is. I love the aggressive nature of his offenses but we will NEVER be great without being run first. Run first and then air raid.

Reply
Patrick O'Brien
0
Patrick O'Brien

If we hadn't lost to Michigan I would have felt it was a one off. The lack of adjustments looks like a coaching issue with multiple coaches offense and defense. The offensive line is pathetic and needs an upgrade.

Reply
Joe Kuphal
0
Joe Kuphal

Nebraska has to prove it is not the same old story…until they do by definition it is.

Reply
Jon Howser
0
Jon Howser

Incompetent coaching staff, admitted out coached, the defensive coordinator didn’t even know who was playing in the second half

Reply
Joe Hegarty
0
Joe Hegarty

Need to come up with an offensive that fits the talent we have but doubt that will happen.

Reply

No — just a rough game, no trend

3 Comments
PJ SAid
0
PJ SAid

I guess we will find out tomorrow morning. GBR

Reply
Richard Lydick
0
Richard Lydick

No big deal. Recovery on the way

Reply
Steve Slezak
0
Steve Slezak

Leave these boys alone. They are going to start believing the BS and senseless criticism y'all spew.

Reply
Does Rhule’s “destination job” comment ease worries about a coaching departure?

Does Rhule’s “destination job” comment ease worries about a coaching departure?

Yes — sounds committed

2

No — talk is cheap

4

Yes — sounds committed

2 Comments
PJ SAid
0
PJ SAid

I feel it ease worries a LITTLE bit. I think he has already talked to his friend Pat, AD at Penn State, and was told that Penn State Alumni want someone more proven than Rhule. So, Rhule is way down the list.

Reply
MIchael Bennett
0
MIchael Bennett

I think Rhule wants to finish what he started

Reply

No — talk is cheap

4 Comments
lonnie irvine
0
lonnie irvine

a simple I'm going nowhere would have answered it once and for all not a politician's way to answer

Reply
Vincent Regan
0
Vincent Regan

Don't have to worry no more now.

Reply
VAHuskerFan
0
VAHuskerFan

No, it means nothing, he is gone or he woulda squashed it and said he was taking his name out of consideration and he didn’t.

Reply
Scott Reed
0
Scott Reed

What else would he say...It really sucks here??? He hasn't said, "I'm not interested in the Penn State Job".

Reply

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT