Asked by Husker Max

7/7/2014

Do you like the additions of Maryland & Rutgers to the B1G Ten?

23%

Yes

77%

No WINNER

23%

Yes

4 Comments

Marty Norris Davis

How can you not with the Rutgers being the oldest football team and the Terps with a great fan-base and in a well poplulated area! Just more room for Husker expansion! :)

Brian Reilly

I live in Northern VA, so when the Huskers play at MD, I will go! Will miss the Penn St. game every year though.

Ron Bauer

Why not make college football available to any qualified school. The more the "merrier".

Ron Ames

As a Maryland grad and long time Husker, Maryland is a great addition -- look past football to all other sports and to academics. Great academic ranking and many, many Championships in many sports.

77%

No

6 Comments

dan callahan

Not a good fit. Too many conference teams not playing each other.

Bart Burroughs

are we an east coast conference? or a midwestern conference?

Dalynn Parks

Maryland and Rutgers bring NOTHING to the B1G except a few more TV sets.......our B1G "West" schedule sucks big time!!! Where is Michigan? OSU? PSU? Like the Big 12 North again minus Texa$$ BS!!

Dan Novak

too many teams. These two don't bring enough to the table.

Brandon Beasley

Makes this conference look even weaker

Carol Edmonds

The league is too watered down and I don't like our new division. We don't play the big boys often enough.

What should define Nebraska’s running back room heading into 2026?

Asked by Husker Max

1 month left

What should define Nebraska’s running back room heading into 2026?

70%

One clear feature back One clear feature back

30%

A situational committee A situational committee

70%

One clear feature back

3 Comments

David Weaver

Feature back is important to have but DEPTH is also CRITICAL. If don't have a feature back then either then depth chart is flooded with talent. But in the Big Ten you better have a GREAT 2nd and 3rd string to make it through the season. With EJ it helped he was so quick he didn't take huge hits

Terry Barker

Nebraska was always most stable when we had a feature back that can actually "carry" the team with his legs.

Ron Joseph

Nebraska in the past was successful with one top back. We've fallen on hard times because we haven't developed or recruited a great back. But the others need to be developed so we have a pipeline of backs like we use to have.

30%

A situational committee

4 Comments

Thomas Wright

Roger Craig & Tom Rathman ring a bell ? Not only a dynamic duo playing for NU, but also for the 49ers !! YES we want multiple RB’s to rotate in & out to keep their legs fresh!! GBR 🎈

SEW

Look at the success in the playoff, the teams have 2-3 capable RB's they use to keep them healthy and offer the D different looks. Johnson was unique, most backs can't take that many snaps a season and stay healthy and sharp.

PJ SAid

Every good team, including the NFL, will rotate backs on a regular basis. This last year Nebraska should have used a 2nd running back more often - NEB is lucked out EJ stayed healthy.