Husker Max

Husker Max

huskermax.com
Everything you ever wanted to know about the Huskers www.huskermax.com
Do you agree that Armstrong will be a tough player to replace?
Husker Max Asked by Husker Max
4/26/2017

Do you agree that Armstrong will be a tough player to replace?

23%
Yes

4

77%
No WINNER

14

23%
Yes

3 Comments
Richard Johnson
4
Richard Johnson

When we face a team with a good pas s rush, you will see how badly we will miss him

Reply
Keith Petrie
Keith Petrie

You're absolutely right. If your QB can't run... can't roll out... can't execute the option... you're in trouble. Unless you e got an O Line that can protect the QB. We'll see about that!

Jerry Williams
1
Jerry Williams

Unless the offensive line is much better I do not know anyone who could scramble and gain time like Tommy when the line collapsed.

Reply
Mark Eiserman
0
Mark Eiserman

Heart & soul of the team. With a senior backing him up. there is no depth behind him.

Reply

77%
No

14 Comments
Joel Rodgers
6
Joel Rodgers

Great guy, great heart, Great runner, OK passer. We need to be able to throw the ball about 20 times a game and complete 16 of them. Especially down the field. He could throw far but not accurate. The receivers made him look better than he was,

Reply
Jon Moore
2
Jon Moore

He was not a good passer.

Reply
David MacKay
1
David MacKay

Tommy has heart and played his butt off for this team. I don't know if there was a better passer while rolling out of the pocket...however he was too inconsistent and was not the QB for Riley's and Langsdorf's system They have their type QB now..put up or shut up!!!

Reply
John M. Hodge
1
John M. Hodge

With this new offense, He would have been a backup-great character, excellent teammate... just not the right fit for where we are going

Reply
Stephen Johnson
0
Stephen Johnson

Tommy never fit into Riley's offensive plans. He has 4 passing qbs on the team.

Reply
Larry Sidders
0
Larry Sidders

Consistency! He can lead the team to the big win one week and lose the game with mistakes the next.

Reply
Darin Brandt
0
Darin Brandt

I believe the Huskers should be a better passing team .Will not have the same big runs that Tommie could produce as a dual threat QB.

Reply
Peter Rygol
0
Peter Rygol

Like Banker said of him, a heart of a lion and a very good running QB. But a passer, please. Not the best QB IQ and decision making often times left you shaking your head.

Reply
Robert Lloyd
0
Robert Lloyd

He was the worst QB in major college football. We had little chance to win a big game unless he happened to have a good day. Everyone else in college knew he wasn't a QB but hey "Bo Knows"???

Reply
Jim Kohout
0
Jim Kohout

Tommy had pluses and minuses to his game. We will miss his running ability, but he can be replaced.

Reply
Dave Ronnekamp
0
Dave Ronnekamp

he was best running the ball..we need a qb that can pass.

Reply
Ronald Pfeifer
0
Ronald Pfeifer

Tired of his inconsistency.

Reply
Paul F Edwards
0
Paul F Edwards

take his legs away and what do you have? A QB that can't hardly throw. It won't be hard at all...

Reply
Jody Acree
0
Jody Acree

I like TA. But he missed critical games for him being so tough. Very, VERY inconsistent. I want a QB who has true toughness like Scott Frost and Eric Crouch. Those guys represent toughness.

Reply
What's your reaction to the Huskers' switch to rugby-style punting?

What's your reaction to the Huskers' switch to rugby-style punting?

Thumbs up

4

Thumbs down

1

Thumbs up

4 Comments
Larry Johnson
0
Larry Johnson

I do not care HOW the punting is done. Only that it leads to WINS.

Reply
Steve Rentzell
0
Steve Rentzell

If something is broken, what does it hurt to try something different. Insanity- Doing the same thing and expecting a different result.

Reply
Danny Purcell
0
Danny Purcell

taking full advantage of college rules

Reply
Ron Graf
0
Ron Graf

I like this style of punting. With the roll-out, it keeps the defense honest by keeping them in position in case of runs/throws by the punter.

Reply

Thumbs down

1 Comment
Mike O
0
Mike O

Anything less than a drop kick just isn't trying. Additionally, NU had a punter who averaged 44 yards a kick and he had to transfer for a player to be named later. Maybe get the rugby guy in and set in place before upending what would have been a solid punting game.

Reply
Will you be in Memorial Stadium for the "Husker Games" on April 26?

Will you be in Memorial Stadium for the "Husker Games" on April 26?

Yes: Must support the team.

0

No: It's a poor Spring Game substitute.

9

Yes: Must support the team.

0 Comment
No one has commented yet

No: It's a poor Spring Game substitute.

9 Comments
Nate Stineman
0
Nate Stineman

Too much hassle (200 miles away) for an unknown event.

Reply
Tom Cullinan
0
Tom Cullinan

The event is a non-starter compared to the structure of actual plays and the support of young men working to find their place on the team.

Reply
Richard Johnson
0
Richard Johnson

No interest in 7-on-7.

Reply
Dan Larsen
0
Dan Larsen

Live in Dayton, Ohio! 800 miles one-way.... but I am a season ticket holder. See you during the season.

Reply
Ryan Goecke
0
Ryan Goecke

If I want to see a carnival or a faire I'll go see one. This change shows fear of being a competitor on the part of Rhule and NU Athletics. It's embarrassing.

Reply
Dave Kapke
0
Dave Kapke

I live in Colorado

Reply
Kent Haynes
0
Kent Haynes

I can see both sides. But it is losing a tradition.

Reply
Bruce Craig
0
Bruce Craig

Losing the best recruiting tool of the spring and losing the money it would bring in is not smart in my opinion.

Reply
Robert Lloyd
0
Robert Lloyd

It's not a game. This was our tradition. Not a good decision on Rhule's part.

Reply

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT