Asked by Husker Max

10/22/2015

Do we need more running from Tommy Armstrong?

92%

Yes, great weapon WINNER

8%

No, the injury risk

92%

Yes, great weapon

6 Comments

Arlie Rauch

I wouldn't normally vote this way, but he seems to be able to get yards when hardly anyone else can.

Valerie Gilmore

they call it duel threat for a reason

Ed Payne

Tommy is a more complete QB now, but his legs are a weapon that shouldn't be ignored.

Keith Petrie

We've run the QB before.... :-/

Tyrd Ferguson

Play to win. Every day. If our team rises and falls on one player, then we don't have a team. Players get injured. The next in line steps up. Often the next in line is great. So what, if not? PLAY TO WIN. RUN TOMMY RUN!

Jim Stiver

He has had many opportunities when rolling out to run with the ball and yet he keys on a receiver and thats it he will throw the ball even if there is double coverage on the guy. He needs to run he would pick up a lot of yards this way.

8%

No, the injury risk

1 Comment

Billie Mann

he'll get hurt sooner or later and the more he runs the sooner that will happen

Does Anthony Colandrea’s skill set change how Nebraska can design its offense?

Asked by Husker Max

1 month left

Does Anthony Colandrea’s skill set change how Nebraska can design its offense?

91%

Yes Yes

9%

No No

91%

Yes

8 Comments

Linda Ogren

YES have QB option run pass

Robert Lloyd

He seems more than just a mobile QB, he plays with abandon and spunk. Why wasn't he here right out of high school? But how could we have lost Ekeler? Have we turned into the dumbest program in America?

Ruthie Patterson

Mobile QB

Michael Gross

Running quarterback opens ton on new plays.

Scott Ferguson

Mobility is a good thing to have. Opens up a few things.

John Haller

It better or Holgorsen will need to be the next firing

Joe Hegarty

I sure hope so.

Alexanderthegreatandterrible

Of course, it should since we had a statue QB, once Lateef was in the offense changed to suit his skill set, and so it follows that Dana will tweak the offense to suit Colandea's skill set and with a new o-line coach changes come.

9%

No

1 Comment

Rod Shuman

You would HOPE it does but I’ve got zero faith they’ll utilize him the right way

Will Fred Hoiberg's Huskers still be undefeated when the calendar flips to February?

Asked by Husker Max

1 month left

Will Fred Hoiberg's Huskers still be undefeated when the calendar flips to February?

39%

Yes Yes

61%

No No

39%

Yes

1 Comment

Gary Wall

I HOPE! CAN WE HOPE!

61%

No

8 Comments

Drew Puls

Michigan

Robert Schutt

With 3 of the remaining 4 January games on the road, it will be an uphill climb in remaining playoff undefeated.

Terrence Smith

... and I hope I'm wrong.

Randy Wolf

Michigan.

VAHuskerFan

They r playing really well but I just don’t see them winning out in January, they live and die by the 3 and it’s gonna end up costing them, not much inside the paint game. I see everyone standing outside the 3 line wanting to shoot the 3 but no one ever inside to get rebounds, wont work against Mich

Suicide Slush Puppie

Probably not - that's expecting a lot - but regardless, what they've accomplished is nothing short of extraordinary.

Jerry Goodwin

This team is really good and they will continue to give themselves a chance in every game, but...3 of the next 4 on the road, including Michigan? That's a tough run. If they win out in January and beat Illinois at home on February 1st, they'll be #1 in the country the next day.

Roy Katskee

They are living on borrowed time.

Husker Max

Do we need more running from Tommy Armstrong?

92% Yes, great weapon WINNER

8% No, the injury risk

92% Yes, great weapon

8% No, the injury risk

Does Anthony Colandrea’s skill set change how Nebraska can design its offense?

91% Yes Yes

9% No No

91% Yes

9% No

Will Fred Hoiberg's Huskers still be undefeated when the calendar flips to February?

39% Yes Yes

61% No No

39% Yes

61% No

92%

Yes, great weapon WINNER

8%

No, the injury risk

92%

Yes, great weapon

8%

No, the injury risk

91%

Yes Yes

9%

No No

91%

Yes

9%

No

39%

Yes Yes

61%

No No

39%

Yes

61%

No