Asked by
ABC 17 News
Because it directly affects disabled and vulnerable populations, people with arfid, People who are trying to buy birthday cakes for their children, people who have disabilities who cannot easily make foods, people who have autism who have safe foods, people with diabetes. It's not right to police us
Reply
No one should be banning sweets from SNAP or any other program. This is just a way of controlling people and what is available for them to eat. What is next? MILK?
Reply
42 million people get an avg. of $178 per month of food that is paid for by the other 295 million Americans that work for a living.
The poor/lower middle class aren't the problem, it's the billionaires. Prior to Reagan and trickle-down (Voodoo Economics) the bottom 90% of the population held about a third of the wealth and the 0.7% about 7% .... fast forward to today and the top 0.7% have MORE wealth than the bottom 90%!
Reply
No because there are a lot of people that need those sodas those candies whatever for reasons like oh I don't know to raise their blood sugar up when it gets super low. It's such a misconception and some more false narrative bullshit by these dumbass Republicans like Mike kehoe and Donald Trump.
Reply
Asked by
ABC 17 News
I am not a big fan of bailouts, as Obama did with General Motors, but I do support this President.
Reply
I think it should be cause if they go in OT again people who work can stay up and watch the game and commercials . Then U wouldn't have people missing work the next day cause they stayed up late watching it . They can go work on a Monday normal. be considerate when planning it .
ReplyPeople on the east coast that went to bed (including me)before the best part of the game happened could stay up
ReplyBecause it comes on late to accomodate most people and most people has to get up early and go to work Monday morning!!
ReplySo I can enjoy the game without having to go to work the next day
Reply