ABC 17 News

ABC 17 News

abc17news.com/polls/
Mid-Missouri's source for breaking news, weather & sports. ABC 17 News is a product of NPG of Missouri, LLC.
Should Columbia and Boone County put new coronavirus health orders in place?

Should Columbia and Boone County put new coronavirus health orders in place?

Yes

3

No

6

Yes

Should Columbia and Boone County put new coronavirus health orders in place?
1 Comments
Susie Hunt
0
Susie Hunt

Spike is now occurring locally and Delta Strain is more contagious.

Reply
Susie Hunt
Susie Hunt

Lets see, it used to be the reflex reaction was not worse than the flu, so now its no worse than a common cold, I guess pretty soon it will be getting the Covid is good for you.

Max
Max

The Delta strain is not as dangerous as a common cold, and the liberals are screaming that the sky is falling.

No

Should Columbia and Boone County put new coronavirus health orders in place?
4 Comments
R Keith Grizz Hoffman
1
R Keith Grizz Hoffman

These orders are killing businesses!

Reply
Jolene Cleveland
1
Jolene Cleveland

Why pay for people who does not want the shot

Reply
Niki Goldenstein
0
Niki Goldenstein

No they need to stop the shit

Reply
Do you agree with banning sugary foods and drinks from Missouri's SNAP program?

Do you agree with banning sugary foods and drinks from Missouri's SNAP program?

Yes

8

No

9

Yes

6 Comments
Baconface McGee
2
Baconface McGee

Our taxes shouldn’t be paying for other people’s junk food.

Reply
Fat Guy Outdoors
1
Fat Guy Outdoors

I'm in favor of eliminating the entire snap program.

Reply
michael
0
michael

Curbing sugary foods & drinks significantly decreases chronic illness, which saves tax $$ on health care. The healthier our food choices, the healthier we are. Healthier = happier.

Reply
Dan Mar
0
Dan Mar

Sugary foods are not a necessity. The US has an obesity crisis that is costing taxpayers hundreds of millions every year. I like the sugar tax that Europe is using to help pay for the government health care costs related to junk food consumption.

Reply
Tatyana Karak
0
Tatyana Karak

Sugary food is not essential. SNAP is for people who need to eat food they need not to go hungry. More healthy choices are beneficial for all.

Reply
Patrick
0
Patrick

So taxpayers are 100% funding SNAP and those benefits should be used properly. If SNAP recipients use benefits to buy soda, candy, cake, and other sugary products, we, the taxpayers will also be funding their healthcare for diabetes and other chronic ailments. Enough is enough.

Reply

No

9 Comments
Diane Willoughby
1
Diane Willoughby

Why do we need to control people in our society? Sometimes the only way a child can get a little treat is if their parents can use a little bit of the benefits to buy something a little special.

Reply
michael
michael

Mindful what we call 'treats'! Illness producing, ultra processed 'treats' are literally a sickening way to 'treat' our kids. A handful of delicious blueberries, is a treat. Banana slices spread with peanut butter is a treat. A handful of Skittles & a diet soda is not.

Angel Lopez Jr
1
Angel Lopez Jr

If you look at the cost of less processed goods, you’ll see that you get much less bang for your buck. You spend more and get less whe. You eliminated the processed goods. Rather than hurt the consumer, the focus should be on making these processed foods healthier. This makes sense to parents.

Reply
Patricia Abruzzise
1
Patricia Abruzzise

No one should be banning sweets from SNAP or any other program. This is just a way of controlling people and what is available for them to eat. What is next? MILK?

Reply
Baby Yoda's Dad
1
Baby Yoda's Dad

That is the only time some kids get a little snack.

Reply
Max
Max

42 million people get an avg. of $178 per month of food that is paid for by the other 295 million Americans that work for a living.

Fred
1
Fred

The poor/lower middle class aren't the problem, it's the billionaires. Prior to Reagan and trickle-down (Voodoo Economics) the bottom 90% of the population held about a third of the wealth and the 0.7% about 7% .... fast forward to today and the top 0.7% have MORE wealth than the bottom 90%!

Reply
Madison Haleigh
1
Madison Haleigh

Because it directly affects disabled and vulnerable populations, people with arfid, People who are trying to buy birthday cakes for their children, people who have disabilities who cannot easily make foods, people who have autism who have safe foods, people with diabetes. It's not right to police us

Reply
Denzel McVeigh
1
Denzel McVeigh

No because there are a lot of people that need those sodas those candies whatever for reasons like oh I don't know to raise their blood sugar up when it gets super low. It's such a misconception and some more false narrative bullshit by these dumbass Republicans like Mike kehoe and Donald Trump.

Reply
Kimberly Jean
0
Kimberly Jean

Just because a person is less fortunate, doesn't mean they must live in misery at all times. The poor can enjoy life too. If they choose to buy themselves or their family a little treat, they are as entitled to do that as anyone else.

Reply
Anonymous Individual
0
Anonymous Individual

I don't have the right to decide what poor people get to eat. Just because we give poor people money for food doesn't give us the right to take away their freedom of choice. They decide what to put into their bodies, not us. It's their bodies, their choice!!!

Reply
Should the Trump administration extend tariff aid beyond agriculture?

Should the Trump administration extend tariff aid beyond agriculture?

Yes

0

No

2

Yes

0 Comment
No one has commented yet

No

2 Comments
Steve Baumann
1
Steve Baumann

I am not a big fan of bailouts, as Obama did with General Motors, but I do support this President.

Reply
Fred
0
Fred

Even more socialist actions by Trump?

Reply

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT