Asked by ABC 17 News

513 Votes

Do you think another 90 days for a federal eviction moratorium was needed?

40%

yes yes

60%

no no

40%

yes

Do you think another 90 days for a federal eviction moratorium was needed?

There are still people that need help and not be evicted due to undue hardship due to the coronavirus.

There are still people that need help and not be evicted due to undue hardship due to the coronavirus. Show Less

2 Comments

Stephen Stewart

Certainty of the doubts precipitated by surroundings, and to regain belief in authority and belief in reason of Christian tradition. Knowledge of tradition of all cultures based on religious tradition. Matthew 7: 12; Luke 6: 31.

60%

no

The economy is better and people should be able to provide for themselves.

The economy is better and people should be able to provide for themselves. Show Less

5 Comments

Max

Maybe some relief for the people that own the buildings. They have payments, taxes, and insurance to pay too.

Adam Schrader

You can't shake a dead cat without coming near a place that's hiring. Quit being a damn bum and get to work already

Zaos Gonzolez

Hey, I have an ideer. Let’s not pay nothing to no one and not produce nothing. Let’s just exist as a simple cyst on the tumor of society. There’s no reason to work hard and help each other. Might as well just sit right here and watch some ball on the cable television.

Lisa Gore

Ruining our landlords chance to save their properties...

sheri smith

I think while not all mind you, enough are like hey I don't have to pay rent so let's go buy that big tv, car, etc and have fun why go to work? Sure there's jobs but we don't need to worry yet the gvt is taking care of us

Do you agree with banning sugary foods and drinks from Missouri's SNAP program?

Asked by ABC 17 News

579 Votes

Do you agree with banning sugary foods and drinks from Missouri's SNAP program?

61%

Yes Yes

39%

No No

61%

Yes

4 Comments

Baconface McGee

Our taxes shouldn’t be paying for other people’s junk food.

Fat Guy Outdoors

I'm in favor of eliminating the entire snap program.

Tatyana Karak

Sugary food is not essential. SNAP is for people who need to eat food they need not to go hungry. More healthy choices are beneficial for all.

Patrick

So taxpayers are 100% funding SNAP and those benefits should be used properly. If SNAP recipients use benefits to buy soda, candy, cake, and other sugary products, we, the taxpayers will also be funding their healthcare for diabetes and other chronic ailments. Enough is enough.

39%

No

9 Comments

Baby Yoda's Dad

That is the only time some kids get a little snack.

Max

42 million people get an avg. of $178 per month of food that is paid for by the other 295 million Americans that work for a living.

Madison Haleigh

Because it directly affects disabled and vulnerable populations, people with arfid, People who are trying to buy birthday cakes for their children, people who have disabilities who cannot easily make foods, people who have autism who have safe foods, people with diabetes. It's not right to police us

Kimberly Jean

Just because a person is less fortunate, doesn't mean they must live in misery at all times. The poor can enjoy life too. If they choose to buy themselves or their family a little treat, they are as entitled to do that as anyone else.

Diane Willoughby

Why do we need to control people in our society? Sometimes the only way a child can get a little treat is if their parents can use a little bit of the benefits to buy something a little special.

Angel Lopez Jr

If you look at the cost of less processed goods, you’ll see that you get much less bang for your buck. You spend more and get less whe. You eliminated the processed goods. Rather than hurt the consumer, the focus should be on making these processed foods healthier. This makes sense to parents.

Anonymous Individual

I don't have the right to decide what poor people get to eat. Just because we give poor people money for food doesn't give us the right to take away their freedom of choice. They decide what to put into their bodies, not us. It's their bodies, their choice!!!

Patricia Abruzzise

No one should be banning sweets from SNAP or any other program. This is just a way of controlling people and what is available for them to eat. What is next? MILK?

Fred

The poor/lower middle class aren't the problem, it's the billionaires. Prior to Reagan and trickle-down (Voodoo Economics) the bottom 90% of the population held about a third of the wealth and the 0.7% about 7% .... fast forward to today and the top 0.7% have MORE wealth than the bottom 90%!

Denzel McVeigh

No because there are a lot of people that need those sodas those candies whatever for reasons like oh I don't know to raise their blood sugar up when it gets super low. It's such a misconception and some more false narrative bullshit by these dumbass Republicans like Mike kehoe and Donald Trump.

Should the Trump administration extend tariff aid beyond agriculture?

Asked by ABC 17 News

137 Votes

Should the Trump administration extend tariff aid beyond agriculture?

42%

Yes Yes

58%

No No

42%

Yes

0 Comment

No one has commented yet

58%

No

2 Comments

Steve Baumann

I am not a big fan of bailouts, as Obama did with General Motors, but I do support this President.

Fred

Even more socialist actions by Trump?

ABC 17 News

Do you think another 90 days for a federal eviction moratorium was needed?

40% yes yes

60% no no

40% yes

60% no

Do you agree with banning sugary foods and drinks from Missouri's SNAP program?

61% Yes Yes

39% No No

61% Yes

39% No

Should the Trump administration extend tariff aid beyond agriculture?

42% Yes Yes

58% No No

42% Yes

58% No

40%

yes yes

60%

no no

40%

yes

60%

no

61%

Yes Yes

39%

No No

61%

Yes

39%

No

42%

Yes Yes

58%

No No

42%

Yes

58%

No