Rittenhouse SquareOffs

Yes

19

No

8

Yes

Do you agree with the Kyle Rittenhouse verdict?
Linda Hallauer
2
Linda Hallauer

I watched part of the trial. I'm not one to blindly accept Hollywood's and the mainstream media's rush to judgment in everything!

Reply
Lisa Gore
2
Lisa Gore

In all angles of the video and drone footage I saw, his life was being threatened and lastly by a guy who admitted pointing his gun at Rittenhouse before Kyle shot him. Reasonable doubt was all they had to have.

Reply
Max
2
Max

Because he was innocent of all charges, and the left were just trying to destroy him, from MSM all the way to Biden the Puppet.

Reply
Michael Leninsky
2
Michael Leninsky

Rittenhouse stepped up to help his father. Biden and the rest of the Democrats caused this problem of civil unrest in the first place.

Reply
sheri smith
2
sheri smith

Regardless of whether or not he should have been carrying a weapon, the videos clearly shows these people were attacking him and he defended himself

Reply
Steve TheBmann
1
Steve TheBmann

I do not see how anyone could find him guilty. He was doing good and we need more of that.

Reply
Todd Johnson
0
Todd Johnson

This is the expected outcome, because of the way the system is currently set up.

Reply

No

Do you agree with the Kyle Rittenhouse verdict?
Carole Majors
0
Carole Majors

It was very bias and I believe it was a set up with having this particular judge. It’s plainly wrong on all levels.

Reply
Kitina Parker
0
Kitina Parker

He is a murder and the judge is racist in many ways. This case needs to be retried and that judge should be disbarred!!!!

Reply
Kathy Ohaver
0
Kathy Ohaver

This man is GUILTY! HE SHOULD'VE never went there with a gun! How can he be innocent?? He killed two people. This is definitely BLIND JUSTICE!! I just don't get it! He should be behind bars. And what a FAKE. reaction to the verdict. He's GUILTY!!!🤬

Reply
Max
Max

You're almost as funny as Alec Baldwin.

Wendi Newman
0
Wendi Newman

This boy did not belong in a civil unrest in the first place. This was vigilante behavior that we have no place for in our society.

Reply
Max
Max

That lie was also proven to be a lie and nothing but a lie at the trial. Innocent of all charges.

lois tyler
0
lois tyler

Because he traveled to another state armed with a gun he could have stayed home. He is 17years old has no business with that kind of a gun, he must have intended to use it.

Reply
Max
Max

That comment was proven to be a lie at the Trial.

Jeffery Schuyler
0
Jeffery Schuyler

I believe his involvement there was provocative and reckless.

Reply
Max
Max

Unlike Darrell E Brooks Jr., who killed five and injured 40 others. right now MSM is trying to figure out how to blame Trump for this, and get Brooks exonerated.

YES

2

NO

12

YES

oh worm
0
oh worm

Im 16 and I used to be much more addicted to my phone. My generation is more depressed & sleep deprived because of social media.

Reply
Dead-not Buried
0
Dead-not Buried

definately, it's gotten wayyy outa hand

Reply

NO

illuminatedi
0
illuminatedi

tell them to focus on real world problems instead of stalking & terrorizing peoples lives. really must have nothing to do

Reply
Elizabeth Spalding
0
Elizabeth Spalding

1. How? Limit the internet? Block websites? = censorship 2. Why? = since when does the government become responsible for my mistakes? 3. This means the government can dictate arbitrary issues of conduct, do you know what that potentially means??!

Reply
Amy
0
Amy

I think the government has enough on its plate.

Reply
Fred Colbern
0
Fred Colbern

No. Government is not your mommy or your daddy (despite popular belief). Whatever happened to self-control and personal responsibility.

Reply
Brian Klein
0
Brian Klein

Self control is the way.

Reply
Larry Ewart
0
Larry Ewart

Why would anyone want more government intervention in to their life? Its not the responsibility of government to be all things for us as individuals.

Reply
Rachel Abudaram
0
Rachel Abudaram

Because everyone in the world loves social media. It’s a thing we all love

Reply
Mike Aronow
0
Mike Aronow

No one's taking away my SquareOffs! Plus, it's far too subjective for the government to get involved.

Reply
Cindy Jones
0
Cindy Jones

Government has no business in my Social Media.

Reply
Larry Ewart
Larry Ewart

I am with you Cindy!

Catz nJazz
0
Catz nJazz

And your sugar addition, and your alcohol and coffee intake, and your fast food intake...do you really want to give the government even more power?

Reply

Yes

4

No

0

Yes

Harry D
2
Harry D

Regardless of income, people should get back what they paid in, with interest.

Reply
Max
0
Max

Why should ambition, and success be penalized?

Reply
Max
Max

Tax all of the income earned when paying in, but no income tax on the money paid back to retired people.

Max
Max

Social security money was collected as a tax, now some politicians want to tax you, when you take back, what you were forced to pay into. How about only giving Social Security to those who paid into it? End the Fraudulent payments.

No

No one has commented yet

About Rittenhouse

Debates and polls on Rittenhouse from the SquareOffs community. Vote on real questions, see how the public is split, and back your side with a defense.

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT