Do you think Doctor Strange In the Multiverse of Madness is a good sequel to Doctor Strange (2016)?

Do you think Doctor Strange In the Multiverse of Madness is a good sequel to Doctor Strange (2016)?

Yes, it naturally follows

4

No, it doesn't have enough to do with it

5

Yes, it naturally follows

4 Comments
Joshua Russo
2
Joshua Russo

Yeah, it's not a direct sequel, but it still feels like a sequel to the first one, it feels like how Days of Future Past followed First Class, plenty of things happened in between those 2 movies but they are still following the same characters and themes.

Reply
Andrew Cozzini
1
Andrew Cozzini

I think the film and its central question "Are you happy?" is actually the MOST logical next story for Dr. Strange. I'm not sure I'd think this the most logical next step if it had released somewhere in '17 or '18. But, given all the wacky hijinks Stephen has gotten into since, it oddly grounds him.

Reply
Mutale Mwananshiku
0
Mutale Mwananshiku

Despite not continuing the mordo stuff its a good follow up because its much darker and weirder than the first film and i liked exploring strange's character by contrasting him with the choices his variants made.

Reply
Brian Klein
0
Brian Klein

I loved every minute of it.

Reply
Bostino
Bostino

no shot...

No, it doesn't have enough to do with it

4 Comments
Bostino
0
Bostino

it looks like a low-budget remake, with a poor story

Reply
NICOLAS GARCIA
0
NICOLAS GARCIA

Visually, it's absolutely masterful. Visuals, action, cinematography, and performances are perfect. The story and writing does not compliment those things and film suffers fundamentally with regressing and repeating arcs (Wanda). Also between Mordo and Christine it seems we have a movie missing.

Reply
Justin Hayes
0
Justin Hayes

I’m on the fence, but I think no. I think you miss too much in-between if you go from one to the next

Reply
Eric Cope
0
Eric Cope

It's more of a sequel to WandaVision than Dr Strange. There's a lot that doesn't even get mentioned that takes place between the 1st and 2nd films.

Reply
Should taxpayer money go towards the White House ballroom?

Should taxpayer money go towards the White House ballroom?

Yes

0

No

4

Yes

0 Comment
No one has commented yet

No

4 Comments
Patty Contreras
0
Patty Contreras

Big waste of money on a vanity project that does not benefit Americans. Money can be better spent on Healthcare, the homeless, housing, daycare, education..I could go on and on. This president is the biggest conman and grifter ever in history. He has already wasted & stolen billions of dollars.

Reply
Linda Rothrock Jurus
0
Linda Rothrock Jurus

When it proposed Trump said it was being built by private donors! Now Liar in Chief wants taxpayers to foot bill... Just another of many lies!

Reply
L. Maldonado
0
L. Maldonado

Illegal. No Congressional permission. No taxpayer approval. Unneeded. No his personal residence. WH belongs to the people, not the Kremlin look-a-like. Trump is not POTUS; he was constitutionally banned from office. He DID NOT WIN, because the Constitution says so. (14thA, section 3.)

Reply
Ralph Stewart
0
Ralph Stewart

The average American is being hurt by the rising gas and grocery prices and shouldn’t be expected to pay for an extravagant ballroom. The US doesn’t need to be spending money on luxuries like a ballroom, when it can’t pay its 28 TRILLION DOLLARS debt. The country is on the verge of bankruptcy!

Reply
Do you watch late night talk shows?

Do you watch late night talk shows?

Yes

1

No

0

Yes

1 Comment
Sharon
0
Sharon

In view of the mess our country is in now, I find it relaxing to enjoy some light-hearted humor before going to bed.

Reply

No

0 Comment
No one has commented yet

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT