Do you think Doctor Strange In the Multiverse of Madness is a good sequel to Doctor Strange (2016)?

Do you think Doctor Strange In the Multiverse of Madness is a good sequel to Doctor Strange (2016)?

Yes, it naturally follows

4

No, it doesn't have enough to do with it

5

Yes, it naturally follows

4 Comments
Joshua Russo
2
Joshua Russo

Yeah, it's not a direct sequel, but it still feels like a sequel to the first one, it feels like how Days of Future Past followed First Class, plenty of things happened in between those 2 movies but they are still following the same characters and themes.

Reply
Andrew Cozzini
1
Andrew Cozzini

I think the film and its central question "Are you happy?" is actually the MOST logical next story for Dr. Strange. I'm not sure I'd think this the most logical next step if it had released somewhere in '17 or '18. But, given all the wacky hijinks Stephen has gotten into since, it oddly grounds him.

Reply
Mutale Mwananshiku
0
Mutale Mwananshiku

Despite not continuing the mordo stuff its a good follow up because its much darker and weirder than the first film and i liked exploring strange's character by contrasting him with the choices his variants made.

Reply
Brian Klein
0
Brian Klein

I loved every minute of it.

Reply
Bostino
Bostino

no shot...

No, it doesn't have enough to do with it

4 Comments
Bostino
0
Bostino

it looks like a low-budget remake, with a poor story

Reply
NICOLAS GARCIA
0
NICOLAS GARCIA

Visually, it's absolutely masterful. Visuals, action, cinematography, and performances are perfect. The story and writing does not compliment those things and film suffers fundamentally with regressing and repeating arcs (Wanda). Also between Mordo and Christine it seems we have a movie missing.

Reply
Justin Hayes
0
Justin Hayes

I’m on the fence, but I think no. I think you miss too much in-between if you go from one to the next

Reply
Eric Cope
0
Eric Cope

It's more of a sequel to WandaVision than Dr Strange. There's a lot that doesn't even get mentioned that takes place between the 1st and 2nd films.

Reply
If you could only have one pet, would it be a cat or a dog?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
970 Votes

If you could only have one pet, would it be a cat or a dog?

A cat!

5

A dog!

6

A cat!

4 Comments
Ann Harbert Evensen
1
Ann Harbert Evensen

Cats are more independent.

Reply
robert shaw
0
robert shaw

Cat's are way easier to take care of.

Reply
Heidi Owen
0
Heidi Owen

They're independant.

Reply
Khara H.
0
Khara H.

I've had cats all my life and dogs most of that time. I prefer how cats interact with their humans since they seem to be more independent. We now have Bengal kittens who come to their name, play fetch

Reply

A dog!

6 Comments
k san
0
k san

I've had and love both, but a dog would be my 1 choice.

Reply
Brad Livsey
0
Brad Livsey

Dogs dig it! Cat are indignant!

Reply
Patricia Brady-McKinney
0
Patricia Brady-McKinney

I could not live without my dogs, they are so much fun, and we do dog sports. Unconditional love and affection from them is a plus. I do love cats too, but it would have to be a dog.

Reply
Latterdaysaint
0
Latterdaysaint

Cats are annoying

Reply
Mou Chat Reed
Mou Chat Reed

And dogs stick their noses where they don't belong and men just stand and watch their dog do it.

Teresa Raymond Tieben
0
Teresa Raymond Tieben

Dogs love unconditionally and show it all the timeand they are loyal! Cats not so much!

Reply
Should President Trump continue to pursue a United States takeover of Greenland?

Should President Trump continue to pursue a United States takeover of Greenland?

Yes

10

No

7

Yes

3 Comments
Vanessa Vaughan
0
Vanessa Vaughan

I ignored it just like Republican lawmakers ignore takkng a bigger stance on control on school shootings. All they do is give meaningless mouth service the whole time pocketing money from NRA lobbyists. I don't want to take anyone's guns from them, but our children should feel safe.

Reply
Felicia Megan
0
Felicia Megan

He needs to chill.

Reply
Max
0
Max

Trump got the deal today January 21st.. Trump helps Americans again. Daily.

Reply
Max
Max

Fred, keep reading CNN. LOL

Fred
Fred

There are two ways to be fooled: One is to believe what isn't true, and the other is to refuse to believe what is true. ― Soren Kierkegaard

No

6 Comments
Nancy Sims-VanBuren
1
Nancy Sims-VanBuren

He has us at odds with our allies, our adversaries and within our own nation due to the extreme violence with the ICE issue... civil unrest...

Reply
Max
Max

Wrong again.

Steven Watson
1
Steven Watson

He is completely insane. He and his cabinet want the natural resources, like Venezuela oil!!!

Reply
Max
Max

Wrong again.

Bryan Jones
1
Bryan Jones

We already have a military presence in Greenland. Denmark is a NATO ally. Trump should NOT be threatening the European balance or the time-tested established order. This has ramifications far beyond Trump's ego.

Reply
Max
Max

Wrong again.

0571953
1
0571953

US should not invade other countries. Never Greenland or Venezuela. This is Trump enriching himself. Dangerous and destroying US reputation on human rights.

Reply
Max
Max

He didn't invade them.

Denzel McVeigh
1
Denzel McVeigh

You don't own this country and you can't own Greenland matter of fact go away you prick

Reply
Max
Max

Wrong again.

Kevin Blount
1
Kevin Blount

We have existing agreements with Greenland and Denmark regarding military bases. We should expand on that, rather than threaten to take the entire country by force 'if necessary'

Reply
Max
Max

Trump made a deal that everyone loves. All over the EU.

Who to Follow
Andu

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT