Should there be more police officers at schools?

Should there be more police officers at schools?

Yes

6

No

3

Yes

6 Comments
Latterdaysaint
0
Latterdaysaint

That and metal detectors

Reply
Mr.M
0
Mr.M

Our children are the future and our tax dollars should invest in our future, NOT be funding crap show in Ukraine or paying for sex change operations for illegals and criminals. Those are NOT investments for our future.

Reply
Michael Danner
0
Michael Danner

Kids should feel safe at school

Reply
Hannah Bowen
0
Hannah Bowen

Our kids our required to go to school; the government should be required to ensure their safety. I haven’t taken my kid to school all week because I’m terrified he won’t come home.

Reply
Leslie Krymkevich
0
Leslie Krymkevich

Because there’ve been enough school shootings. If we have armed security at banking institutions, protecting insured and replaceable money, why should there not be armed security at our children’s learning institutions, protecting lives that cannot be otherwise insured and could never be replaced?

Reply
Leslie Bastidas Varela
0
Leslie Bastidas Varela

Kids need to be safe. Schools should be safe learning environments. Cities need to provide school resource officers, use those tax dollars wisely!!!

Reply

No

3 Comments
Taryn Paradise
1
Taryn Paradise

The way I see it , is yes, our kids need to be safe. But if we place all officers at the schools, then we have minimal left to patrol and take care of other needs. Unless we have an over abundance of people training and applying to become officers, then my answer will be no.

Reply
Ed Drahos
0
Ed Drahos

Ask why this wasn't necessary in the 1960s 70s & 80s. Heck we didn't have our schools gated. What has changed? It wouldn't be more weapons would it? 🤷🏻‍♂️

Reply
Melina Elote
0
Melina Elote

Let’s start from the root, there should be gun regulations. Do background checks, mental health checks, run credit scores, ensure guns, ban assault rifles, and I assure you, no more dumb people will buy guns

Reply
Should the Trump administration fight a judge's order that it fully fund SNAP?

Should the Trump administration fight a judge's order that it fully fund SNAP?

Yes

4

No

3

Yes

2 Comments
Fat Guy Outdoors
1
Fat Guy Outdoors

Defund all welfare programs. Make people responsible for their own actions.

Reply
Max
0
Max

SNAP is primarily funded by the U.S. federal government through congressional appropriations, with the USDA providing the funds, and states administering the program and covering their share of administrative costs.

Reply
Max
Max

Trump won this. SCOTUS ruled in favor of Trump.

No

3 Comments
Eric Smith
1
Eric Smith

Trump basically has no say in this, it's on the shoulders of Congress. Might want to study what all the 111th Congress did back in 2009-11... this is all about payback.

Reply
Zaos Gonzolez
0
Zaos Gonzolez

Spend the money on something else. Send missiles to israel instead.

Reply
Toasty
0
Toasty

Its all a game both sides are playing with real people in the middle. Trump should step aside and tell congress this mess is all theirs.

Reply
Max
Max

Schumer knows this is all on the backs of the democrats.

Do you believe the POTUS should have broad authority to impose tariffs on other countries?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
223 Votes

Do you believe the POTUS should have broad authority to impose tariffs on other countries?

Yes

2

No

4

Yes

2 Comments
William Schwabe
0
William Schwabe

Because the president wants to put America first and make it as prosperous as it once was. #MAGA

Reply
Steven Miles
0
Steven Miles

Exec branch has the responsibility to manage the economy with other countries, congress can’t even produce an annual budget - look at this democrat shutdown, they want to spend another 1.5T on healthcare subsidies- sorry, we are in the hole $35T, wake up America.

Reply

No

4 Comments
k san
0
k san

Congress has the power of the purse, if only they would use it. but they're too scared of being primaried by him. Of course, he should not have 1/3 of the powers he has adopted, whether constitutional or not. He's an abomination!!

Reply
Tom Pummer
0
Tom Pummer

Trump’s tariffs violate the constitution. Congress holds the nations purse strings. I can’t believe we hardly heard a peep from members of Congress on his actions. Spineless

Reply
Rick Martinson
0
Rick Martinson

Absolutely not. The Constitution gives that authority to Congress, NOT the executive branch of the government. Trump’s actions are absolutely illegal and unconstitutional. But he doesn’t care, and has been giving Congress and the American People the finger for the past 10 months.

Reply
Mike Moreno
0
Mike Moreno

Memo to trump...there is a document in this country called the Constitution. Read it, learn it, live it.

Reply

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT