.png?1683934188 "13 On Your Side")
.jpg?1762493919 "Should the Trump administration fight a judge's order that it fully fund SNAP?")
.png?1683934188 "13 On Your Side")
Asked by
Yes
No
3
Comments
Taryn Paradise
The way I see it , is yes, our kids need to be safe. But if we place all officers at the schools, then we have minimal left to patrol and take care of other needs. Unless we have an over abundance of people training and applying to become officers, then my answer will be no.
Reply
Melina Elote
Let’s start from the root, there should be gun regulations. Do background checks, mental health checks, run credit scores, ensure guns, ban assault rifles, and I assure you, no more dumb people will buy guns
Reply
Asked by
That and metal detectors
ReplyOur children are the future and our tax dollars should invest in our future, NOT be funding crap show in Ukraine or paying for sex change operations for illegals and criminals. Those are NOT investments for our future.
ReplyKids should feel safe at school
ReplyOur kids our required to go to school; the government should be required to ensure their safety. I haven’t taken my kid to school all week because I’m terrified he won’t come home.
ReplyBecause there’ve been enough school shootings. If we have armed security at banking institutions, protecting insured and replaceable money, why should there not be armed security at our children’s learning institutions, protecting lives that cannot be otherwise insured and could never be replaced?
ReplyKids need to be safe. Schools should be safe learning environments. Cities need to provide school resource officers, use those tax dollars wisely!!!
Reply