Hacking SquareOffs

Yes

8

No

3

Yes

Should the state investigate a reporter who exposed a flaw on a government website?
Max
1
Max

A responsible person would alert the State to this flaw so it could be corrected without costing money or danger to innocent victims. This so called journalist needs to do some hard jail time.

Reply
Will Mason
1
Will Mason

I voted yes due to the incredibly biased way your question is posed. The question should say " should the state investigate the reporterwho hacked the system." he did not do it to expose flaws. He did it to dig up dirt. Exposing the flaw was a side effect. Not the intent.

Reply
Vernon Taylor
1
Vernon Taylor

Politically motivated and potentially (read most likely) criminal - that is an apt description of the St. Louis Post Disgrace.

Reply

No

Should the state investigate a reporter who exposed a flaw on a government website?
Laura Davidson
0
Laura Davidson

At least HE found it!!

Reply
Wendi Newman
0
Wendi Newman

The reporter just did their job. Parson just doesn't want to take responsibility.

Reply
Max
Max

If that is true, then the reporter can institute legal proceedings against Parson and get rich, unless the very biased press is not telling the truth. We will see.

Brian Jones
0
Brian Jones

Because the reporter did nothing with the info except report it to the people that needed to fix it. Parsons has no clue of how to run Missouri.

Reply

35%
Russia

1

65%
DNC WINNER

3

35%
Russia

Who 'meddled' more?
Audrey Klesta
0
Audrey Klesta

because I have a brain! It's verifiably true!!

Reply

65%
DNC

Who 'meddled' more?
PsoNik Aitchison
1
PsoNik Aitchison

DNC have more links to the NSA

Reply
Ryan Hebert
0
Ryan Hebert

Russiagate wss created by John Podesta, the DNC and the Deep State

Reply

YES

2

NO

12

YES

oh worm
0
oh worm

Im 16 and I used to be much more addicted to my phone. My generation is more depressed & sleep deprived because of social media.

Reply
Dead-not Buried
0
Dead-not Buried

definately, it's gotten wayyy outa hand

Reply

NO

illuminatedi
0
illuminatedi

tell them to focus on real world problems instead of stalking & terrorizing peoples lives. really must have nothing to do

Reply
Elizabeth Spalding
0
Elizabeth Spalding

1. How? Limit the internet? Block websites? = censorship 2. Why? = since when does the government become responsible for my mistakes? 3. This means the government can dictate arbitrary issues of conduct, do you know what that potentially means??!

Reply
Amy
0
Amy

I think the government has enough on its plate.

Reply
Fred Colbern
0
Fred Colbern

No. Government is not your mommy or your daddy (despite popular belief). Whatever happened to self-control and personal responsibility.

Reply
Brian Klein
0
Brian Klein

Self control is the way.

Reply
Larry Ewart
0
Larry Ewart

Why would anyone want more government intervention in to their life? Its not the responsibility of government to be all things for us as individuals.

Reply
Rachel Abudaram
0
Rachel Abudaram

Because everyone in the world loves social media. It’s a thing we all love

Reply
Mike Aronow
0
Mike Aronow

No one's taking away my SquareOffs! Plus, it's far too subjective for the government to get involved.

Reply
Cindy Jones
0
Cindy Jones

Government has no business in my Social Media.

Reply
Larry Ewart
Larry Ewart

I am with you Cindy!

Catz nJazz
0
Catz nJazz

And your sugar addition, and your alcohol and coffee intake, and your fast food intake...do you really want to give the government even more power?

Reply
Who to Follow
KTVZ

About Hacking

Debates and polls on Hacking from the SquareOffs community. Vote on real questions, see how the public is split, and back your side with a defense.

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT