Boulder SquareOffs

Yes

0

No

3

Yes

0 Comment
No one has commented yet

No

3 Comments
edward deines
0
edward deines

Put a tall yellow post so people can see the end of the drive.

Reply
ulyssesdraco
0
ulyssesdraco

If anything we should continue to feed the boulder's insatiable hunger for cars. Who knows what a starving boulder would be capable of?!

Reply
Wickedpetedogg Fishing
0
Wickedpetedogg Fishing

No. Keeping it Reckless. 🐭🤙🏽This Rocks.

Reply

Yes. They're made to kill.

5

No. It's my right to own one.

14

Yes. They're made to kill.

Should assault weapons be banned?
3 Comments
Letitia DenHartog
0
Letitia DenHartog

They are not useful for hunting, which means ownership of an assault weapon is only for collecting and showing off or to be used as a weapon.

Reply
Max
Max

The AR-15 platform is a very popular hunting rifle, and being ignorant of the facts does not make it an assault rifle. Education is required to understand this, you don't have that education.

Adam Schrader
0
Adam Schrader

We all have a right to protect ourselves but needing assault rifles is obsurd. Ban them!!!

Reply
Anita Grace Ward
0
Anita Grace Ward

There is no good reason for civilians to have assault weapons!

Reply
Nolan pusch
Nolan pusch

in the protection of the country, and for the government can't easily do whatever they want

No. It's my right to own one.

Should assault weapons be banned?
9 Comments
Gene Painter
1
Gene Painter

How do you define an assault weapon? Guns that look scary? This call to ban assault weapons is just the first step towards a total gun confiscation. Fear the government that fears your gun!! The Democrats are just a few steps away from being full blown communists. Something is rotten folks!!

Reply
Adam Schrader
Adam Schrader

We can only hope and pray that our government does the right thing by banning these insane weapons. Nobody needs these.

Aaron Steinke
1
Aaron Steinke

Banning any type of gun is not going to help stop or keep any guns away from criminals or persons wanting to cause harm; it will only keep them away from our law abiding citizens

Reply
Jake Williams
1
Jake Williams

They are already banned. AR15s etc are NOT assault weapons. Educate yourselves before spewing forth inaccurate descriptions on the "news". And riddle me this.... If "gun control" and bans work, then why did the latest shooting occur in a place with strict gun control?

Reply
Max
Max

It was a gun free zone, this can not possibly happen, more lies from the left.

Will Mason
1
Will Mason

Banning them will embolden vicious rioters in the future. Assault weapons will be essential during the coming civil unrest. Yes I mean for defense.

Reply
stacy Hospital
1
stacy Hospital

The guns are not killing people ! People are killing people and they always have and always will.I also believe that they get to much recognition for their murders . Like this guy he was a bully and a loaner .He probably wanted to be noticed!! The reasoning is unknown !!

Reply
Max
0
Max

It is the sane thing to do.It our only protection from an insane government.

Reply
Edi Bodine
0
Edi Bodine

You can't blame the gun it's the unstable moron behind it. I feel that if an assault rifle wants to be purchased then those who want it must complete and obtain a mental health evaluation by licensed mental health specialist.

Reply
Max
Max

But AR-15 rifles are not assault rifles. Citizen can own a fully automatic machine gun legally, but they must possess the required Federal Permit, which costs $200 per year. Knowledge is key.

Adam Schrader
Adam Schrader

Why does anyone NEED an assault rifle? To assault? To kill? No need at all for them. I'm all for a rifle and deer hunting. Having a handgun by your bed for defense. But an assault rifle is pointless.

Max
0
Max

First, assault weapon is an incorrect term, they are Armalite Rifles. Assault weapons are guns that can be selected to full automatic, the firearms in question can not do that. It is lies, smoke and mirrors to call these firearms, assault weapons. Adolf Hitler did the same thing in 1939.

Reply
Max
Max

When Germany enacted gun control, firearm deaths did decline but, Gas Chamber deaths increased to over 8 Million.

Yes, I agree.

5

No, I disagree.

38

Yes, I agree.

5 Comments
Calvin Hamman
0
Calvin Hamman

because if a 16 year old can enroll into the army, they should at least be able to vote.

Reply
Don Elsom
0
Don Elsom

lots of issues being debated today affect 16 YO for years to come. Most are more informed than people my age.

Reply
Darlene Knox
0
Darlene Knox

Only if we bring back civics classes so they understand what they are voting for.

Reply
Mark Clement
0
Mark Clement

kids today are a lot smarter than we were at 16. give 'em a chance to prove themselves.

Reply

No, I disagree.

37 Comments
Joseph Proulx
1
Joseph Proulx

Absolutely not! The voting age should be moved back to 21

Reply
John Driscoll
1
John Driscoll

There is a strong case for restoring the voting age to 21 with an exception for individuals serving with the military or who have been honorably discharge

Reply
Amy Schrader
1
Amy Schrader

Liberals have socialist agenda indoctrinating our kids in the school system. They still live under parents roof, wet behind the ears, NO, NO, NO way they should be allowed to vote yet.

Reply
Kenneth Swipies
1
Kenneth Swipies

The age for most activities should be raised, not lowered. Children are still children.

Reply
Sadie Kittelson
1
Sadie Kittelson

18 was stupid and this insane.!!!!!!

Reply
Lynn Huntley
1
Lynn Huntley

They shouldn't even be allowed to drive. They are NOT mature enough.

Reply
Gramma Jean
0
Gramma Jean

NO! Children are not taught civics and are too immature. Two basic reasons. It was an idea brought out by politics, not common sense.

Reply
Kim Varner
0
Kim Varner

I have a 16 year old. He’s not competent enough to remember to brush his hair and teeth, put deodorant on, put clean clothes on after you shower. No thanks. Leave it to someone who is older.

Reply
Leslie Ann
0
Leslie Ann

Excuse me but... HELL NO... they are NOT all mature enough.

Reply
Kiefer Davis
0
Kiefer Davis

ARE YOU PEOPLE OUT OF YOUR MINDS?

Reply
Kathryn Kinney Evans
0
Kathryn Kinney Evans

Some 16 year olds are mature enough to vote but I would say 90% are not. Voting is an important act and has to be considered carefully.

Reply
Robyn Ryel
0
Robyn Ryel

At 16 you are to influenced by your peers. At that age you are more concerned with what you will wear out Friday night.

Reply
Dilly Powell-Smith
0
Dilly Powell-Smith

Because 16 year olds are not mature enough to be making those kind of decisions.

Reply
Teresa Rodriguez
0
Teresa Rodriguez

Oregon leaders, in their infinite wisdom just moved the smoking age to 21, now want 21 to buy firearms, can't sign a contract til 18, nor live on their own. Now they want more voters, soooooo

Reply
Bradaigh Holt
0
Bradaigh Holt

Absolutely not. It has been scientifically proven that brains (reasoning centers) are not fully developed until age 25.

Reply
Bruce Sharp
0
Bruce Sharp

16 is much too young. Wait until they are out of the house and earning their own living. Love their energy and idealism, but needs to be tempered with experience and pragmatism.

Reply
F Hoskins
0
F Hoskins

They are not emotionally mature enough for serious choices, can be too reactionary

Reply
Anna Howe
0
Anna Howe

They don't know what life is about at 16. Still looking for boy/girl friends.

Reply
Chrissie Wise
0
Chrissie Wise

too young to many immature hormones

Reply
Breeauna Sagdal
0
Breeauna Sagdal

Tide pods, condom snorting and common core... I rest my case! Salem doesn't trust people to own a gun until 21, but voting on future policy is fine? Have you met today's teens?

Reply
Gladys Graybael
0
Gladys Graybael

They not mature or ready to vote, they still out here doing dumbass challenges like sniffing condoms, go missing for 2 days and eating tide pods.

Reply
Fred Farkle
0
Fred Farkle

You know, 15 is almost 16, why not them? Drivers license? 15 year olds can get a permit after taking the same test. While were at it, lower the drinking and marijuana ages to 15 also.

Reply
Kevin Crabtree
0
Kevin Crabtree

Yeah because we all new everything at 16 at least we thought we did. Heck I think its should be raised to 25 that's when you finally figure out you don't know everything

Reply
sharder8
0
sharder8

Tide pods, condom snorting, ice challenge . . . Need I say more?

Reply
Greg and Karen Cross
0
Greg and Karen Cross

At 16 children are vulnerable to peer pressure as well as to people in authority persuading their decisions.

Reply
Kathy Todhunter
0
Kathy Todhunter

Kids at the age of 16 most likely still live at home with parents, they are not of legal age to make decisions and have not worked full time, paid taxes nor have they paid bills for their own support.

Reply
Bob Harlan
0
Bob Harlan

nope they shouldn't be given the right to vote, Legally they aren't responsible for their own lives yet, so why should they be given the privilege of controlling the lives of others.

Reply
Bob Vidourek
0
Bob Vidourek

The canals with water improve on scenic value. Piping would degrade this value.

Reply
Georgeanna Condon
0
Georgeanna Condon

16 year old minds are still developing and changing. No they are barely old enough to know who they are. If you allow them to vote, might as well let them drink, go to war and handle all other adult r

Reply
Fred Farkle
Fred Farkle

agreed. Wait, they're just kids, you can't expect them to drink and fight. They don't understand the consequences, EXACTLY!

Ka San
0
Ka San

Just like smoking and drinking age is 18, as should be the voting age. 16 yr olds are still too much under their parents' authority and would probably just vote however their parents tell them.

Reply
Ken Callison
0
Ken Callison

Before you have the privilege of voting, you should have some skin in the game. Like paying taxes. Being old enough to service in the armed forces, be old enough to be accountable for your actions.

Reply
Dave Voiles
0
Dave Voiles

For heaven's sake! It's all part of the same lefty agenda, just like immigration. Knowing that young people tend to lean liberal it means more Dem votes. They couldn't care less about the kids rights.

Reply
Michael Wagner
0
Michael Wagner

They're still eating tide pods and burning themselves with erasers and want everything for free are you kidding me it should be raised to 21

Reply
Leah Kenville
0
Leah Kenville

Children don't understand what is going on in politics at 16.

Reply
Wanda Hancock
0
Wanda Hancock

Just because they pay taxes, etc. does not mean they know how to vote.....they don't pay attention and have no interest.

Reply
Dave Cupp
0
Dave Cupp

there brains are not fully developed

Reply
Pam Ferguson
0
Pam Ferguson

Kids at that age are to vote what parents or other people tell them not using their own mind &/or beliefs. Barely do at 18!!!!!

Reply

About Boulder

Debates and polls on Boulder from the SquareOffs community. Vote on real questions, see how the public is split, and back your side with a defense.

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT