13 On Your Side

13 On Your Side

kyma.com/
13 On Your Side is a news broadcasting company dedicated to serving the Desert Southwest.
Do you think his tweets are dangerous?
13 On Your Side Asked by 13 On Your Side
7/29/2020

Do you think his tweets are dangerous?

60%
YES WINNER

2

40%
NO

3

60%
YES

2 Comments
Peggy Hayes
0
Peggy Hayes

He wouldn't recognize truth if it slapped him in the face. He's delusional, moronic, a sociopath and dangerous. He's like a vicious child, out of control, and no parent in sight to put him in time out

Reply
Ulysses Daniel Rodriguez
0
Ulysses Daniel Rodriguez

You mean the guy that told people to us hydroxychloroquine to treat covid19 and then people died from it as a result? That guy? Yes, his deranged tweets are a danger.

Reply

40%
NO

3 Comments
Candy Abrahamson Litherland
1
Candy Abrahamson Litherland

He says what all of us are thinking but his balls are bigger

Reply
Bruce Holmes
0
Bruce Holmes

he is NOT going to get a fair shake for the lefts news media, so going to twitter is a great way to go around the lame-stream media! and go directly to the public!!

Reply
Ken Whitson
0
Ken Whitson

Liberal, biased media is what is dangerous. There is very little straight news anymore. It’s all opinion/editorial.

Reply
Should there be more police officers at schools?

Should there be more police officers at schools?

Yes

6

No

1

Yes

6 Comments
Hannah Bowen
0
Hannah Bowen

Our kids our required to go to school; the government should be required to ensure their safety. I haven’t taken my kid to school all week because I’m terrified he won’t come home.

Reply
Hannah Bowen
0
Hannah Bowen

Our kids our required to go to school; the government should be required to ensure their safety. I haven’t taken my kid to school all week because I’m terrified he won’t come home.

Reply
Leslie Krymkevich
0
Leslie Krymkevich

Because there’ve been enough school shootings. If we have armed security at banking institutions, protecting insured and replaceable money, why should there not be armed security at our children’s learning institutions, protecting lives that cannot be otherwise insured and could never be replaced?

Reply
Leslie Krymkevich
0
Leslie Krymkevich

Because there’ve been enough school shootings. If we have armed security at banking institutions, protecting insured and replaceable money, why should there not be armed security at our children’s learning institutions, protecting lives that cannot be otherwise insured and could never be replaced?

Reply
Leslie Bastidas Varela
0
Leslie Bastidas Varela

Kids need to be safe. Schools should be safe learning environments. Cities need to provide school resource officers, use those tax dollars wisely!!!

Reply
Leslie Bastidas Varela
0
Leslie Bastidas Varela

Kids need to be safe. Schools should be safe learning environments. Cities need to provide school resource officers, use those tax dollars wisely!!!

Reply

No

1 Comment
Taryn Paradise
1
Taryn Paradise

The way I see it , is yes, our kids need to be safe. But if we place all officers at the schools, then we have minimal left to patrol and take care of other needs. Unless we have an over abundance of people training and applying to become officers, then my answer will be no.

Reply
Are you relieved about gas prices dropping?

Are you relieved about gas prices dropping?

Yes

0

No

0

Yes

0 Comment
No one has commented yet

No

0 Comment
No one has commented yet

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT