ABC 17 News

ABC 17 News

abc17news.com/polls/
Mid-Missouri's source for breaking news, weather & sports. ABC 17 News is a product of NPG of Missouri, LLC.
Should Missouri ban enforcement of federal gun laws?

Should Missouri ban enforcement of federal gun laws?

Yes. They infringe on my rights.

21

No. The law is the law.

4

Yes. They infringe on my rights.

Should Missouri ban enforcement of federal gun laws?
20 Comments
Matthew Sharon
3
Matthew Sharon

The 2nd amendment is pretty clear

Reply
Jeff McIntosh
2
Jeff McIntosh

The socialist form of government is getting ready to be crammed down our throats, there are shortages of goods and services, gun laws are some of the first things being talked about in the Biden regime, Biden the unifier is undoing everything that his predecessor accomplished, and alienating us.

Reply
val konieczny
2
val konieczny

I believe in our constitution. Our rights are violated on a regular basis. If the people don't act, we'll all be subjected to socialism/communism!

Reply
Karen Voges Schenk
2
Karen Voges Schenk

Missourians have a right to guns and the federal government should not get to override state laws

Reply
Jeff Coats
2
Jeff Coats

My guns, my magazines, my right!

Reply
Amy Wulff
1
Amy Wulff

Lets just have them take all of our rights away, one by one! (insert sarcasm here). if you vote NO you are severely blind to what is happening and you need to take a history lesson!

Reply
Gary Carter
1
Gary Carter

Because the democrats are trying to sneak antigun laws in with the stimulus package!!!!

Reply
Kiegan Osborne
1
Kiegan Osborne

It states clearly shall not be infringed. Any law they create to restrict ownership of arms of any kind is an infringement of the 2nd amendment no if and or buts about it. there are no loop holes in the constitution for creating laws that restrict your ability to own any you desire

Reply
Isaree1102
1
Isaree1102

I feel that if the 2nd amendment is judged and limited, we will go down the path the 1st has- we are judging what speech is and is not okay in public forums, large media is allowed to silence what they don't like, etc. Stop and reflect on how you feel about any and all freedoms. What will be next?

Reply
Border Ruffian
1
Border Ruffian

If the federal government can't be depended upon to preserve constitutional rights, then let that responsibility fall upon the states.

Reply
Fro Jordan
1
Fro Jordan

I can literally go get an illegal gun on ten minutes if I wanted to. People have a right to legally defends themselves. Criminals don't care about your prohibition laws.

Reply
julian dziurawiec
1
julian dziurawiec

because federal gun laws and the creation of the ATF were/are direct violations of the spirit and letter of the law stated in the second amendment. To also include infringing on states rights which the federal government has systematically eroded since the conclusion of the civil war.

Reply
Don Bagley
1
Don Bagley

Quick, severe punishment except for those protecting their life, property, and that of innocent bystanders, while using a legally obtained/owned firearm.

Reply
Sharon Lage
1
Sharon Lage

We have to many of rights taken away everyday.

Reply
Craig Stichter
1
Craig Stichter

States have sovereign rights and able to make the laws that fit our communities. Citizens of CA, MA, NY, etc should not dictate what laws Missourians live by. Disarming law abiding citizens or making law-abiding citizens whom are not able to pay the federal tax rates bend to the favor of the elite.

Reply
Dale Sanders
1
Dale Sanders

It is our constitutional right.

Reply
Charles Crockett
1
Charles Crockett

Because I'm an American that has read and understands the Bill of Rights.

Reply
Randel Hearne
1
Randel Hearne

Gun ownership is given in the constitution and it should not be infringed upon. You should take away the illegal guns from felons before you take away my rights. They lost their rights when they became felons.

Reply
Max
0
Max

It is illegal, to ban a Constitutional Right !

Reply

No. The law is the law.

Should Missouri ban enforcement of federal gun laws?
4 Comments
Mary Kaminski
0
Mary Kaminski

Logic and common decency in keeping our community safe. Enough innocent children have died. Selfishness and ignorance dictate the foolish ban of this law. These ridiculous actions are an embarrassment.

Reply
Lynne Booth
0
Lynne Booth

No civilian should needs weapons that are designed to kill people. They should be outlawed everywhere. Missouri is no exception.

Reply
Letitia DenHartog
0
Letitia DenHartog

There is a reason for laws that are put in place by the federal government and the state shouldn't block those laws

Reply
Karen Voges Schenk
Karen Voges Schenk

obviously you do note about gun owners. What if the government something you did recreationally?

Should the U.S. military step up operations in Venezuela or pull back?

Should the U.S. military step up operations in Venezuela or pull back?

Step it up

3

We should stop

1

Step it up

2 Comments
Eric Smith
1
Eric Smith

What the do on their soil, is their business, but once their drugs are out on boats in the big beautiful Gulf of America, blow them out of the water.

Reply
Max
0
Max

We have plenty of drugs as it is.

Reply

We should stop

1 Comment
Toasty
0
Toasty

We're not the world's police and we executed those people in cold blood. If Venezuela wants to kill its citizens without proof and without a trial, then leave the US out of it.

Reply
Max
Max

Venezuela is helping the companies that make Narcan.

What do you think of demolishing part of the White House to build a ballroom?

What do you think of demolishing part of the White House to build a ballroom?

It doesn't bother me

4

I don't like it

4

It doesn't bother me

4 Comments
Carol Backe
0
Carol Backe

I think if it were Obama, nothing would be said about it. I think just because it’s President Trump there is the hate that some have for him. Not this much controversy when all the other changes were done by other presidents. None of this is costing taxpayers as it has in the past.

Reply
Fred
Fred

Please provide an example of such an expansive change ... this ballroom is likely to turn out to be larger than the White House itself! I don't doubt we'll see a TRUMP sign on it before it is finished!

Max
0
Max

Trump is improving the White House, and he is using private funding to do that.

Reply
Fred
Fred

Right ... "private funding" in exchange for pardons and other favors. The more accurate description is BRIBES.

Kenneth Young
0
Kenneth Young

Separation of the rich and poor is getting wider. I was never invited to watch a movie in the movie room just like I'll never be invited to any dances.....I think we'd be better off if they tore down the west wing

Reply
Eric Smith
0
Eric Smith

Big Beautiful White House

Reply

I don't like it

2 Comments
Chris Macy
1
Chris Macy

STOP THIS MANIAC!!!

Reply
Kelly Branstetter
1
Kelly Branstetter

It's history, it's respect and honor, the ballroom was never approved and the drawings show it overshadowing the White House itself. Awful

Reply

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT