Asked by
ABC 17 News
529 Votes
Should the Supreme Court put workplace vaccination mandates on hold?
Yes
No
The government argued that the mandates are necessary to protect the health and safety of workers and patients.
The government argued that the mandates are necessary to protect the health and safety of workers and patients.
Show Less
1
Comment
Sue Evans
Employers are expected to provide a safe working environment. Employers providing health insurance benefit will have tor raise premiums or stop offering all together.
Reply
Max
Forcing a person to inject a foreign substance into their body, is not providing a safe work environment for that person, or for anyone else. It is also unconstitutional.
1) There is no legal recourse if something goes wrong. 2) These dangerous gene therapies have never been tried before. 3) The chief executive does not make laws. 4) Something needs to happen to Joe Biden.
ReplyBiden has no authority to do this, and he will soon find that out.
ReplyMandates need to go away. Freedom needs to return.
Replynot the role of the federal government. the mandate is unconstitutional and that is the question the high court should be answering
ReplyIt's not the government's job to tell someone to get a vaccination. While I promote getting the vaccine it is up to the person to make their decision on receiving the vaccine.
ReplyIt is now known public info that the vaccines do not prevent the vaccinated from spreading COVID19. Therefore the mandate, targeting only the unvaxxed for weekly testing does not stop the vaccinated from workplace spread.
ReplyIt is illegal for the government to claim they are smarter than every citizen in the US for making our own sound intelligent medical decisions like they have a conservatorship over us. It’s called Parens Patrae, also the Brandon-admin lawyer said the unvaxed are a threat to vaxed=vaxes dont work🇺🇸
Reply