Who's your Husker quarterback - Scott Frost or Eric Crouch?

Who's your Husker quarterback - Scott Frost or Eric Crouch?

Scott Frost

13

Eric Crouch

9

Scott Frost

13 Comments
Paul F Edwards
2
Paul F Edwards

He may not be as purely talented, but there is nothing but winning in Scott Frosts veins. He is a champion. That is why he'll be a fantastic head coach too. He is a winner. Simple as that.

Reply
Chuck Buchholz
1
Chuck Buchholz

Crouch could beat you with his legs but Frost was the best leader and the toughest.

Reply
Tony Bunting
1
Tony Bunting

Both were great, but Frost could do everything Crouch did and was more of a leader.

Reply
Randy Weitzenkamp
1
Randy Weitzenkamp

I'd go with Frost as he was a fierce competitor who wasn't afraid to run someone over when necessary. The national championship was icing on the cake. Why wasn't this Frazier vs Frost?

Reply
Alan Pattee
1
Alan Pattee

Actually I would do it Tommie Frazier

Reply
Ruben Ernesto Sandoval
Ruben Ernesto Sandoval

Agree, no offense but they're competing for second place after Touchdown Tommy.

Ron Joseph
1
Ron Joseph

Scott for leadership qualities, drive and toughness. While Eric was the better runner, Scott was the better option QB.

Reply
Gene Baker
1
Gene Baker

Scott Frost was just the better athlete and competitor. He the one with the undeafeated season and National Championship.

Reply
Randy Austin
1
Randy Austin

I believe he had just a little more drive

Reply
Frank Johnson
1
Frank Johnson

Could have picked either one and been happy. Scott wasn't as fast but I do believe he was the tougher runner.

Reply
Dave
1
Dave

One stat matters most.

Reply
Livio S Nespoli
1
Livio S Nespoli

He is a born winner who would do anything to win or help his team. Play offense or defense and do it well.

Reply
Wes Thrun
1
Wes Thrun

tough call for me, Scott Frost just had or has an attitude about him, he ran angry. I guess the question i would have is what would crouch have done with that 97 offensive line and coach Osborne

Reply

Eric Crouch

9 Comments
Joby Clauson
1
Joby Clauson

Eric Crouch had to carry the load of the offense. Scott was good too, but had better support and more weapons. Eric was faster, quicker as a runner, better instincts on the option. He also had better arm strength. Scott was bigger and stronger as a runner, a more vocal leader though. Close call

Reply
Doug Miller
0
Doug Miller

Tough call but Crouch with his legs.

Reply
Patrick Ryan
0
Patrick Ryan

They were both terrific, but if we are comparing players (not teams) - it isn't very close. Eric Crouch could carry a team; he wasn't just 'fast' - he was tough and had a great will to win.

Reply
Doug Daubert
0
Doug Daubert

Scott had a better team around him. I believe Crouch was the better athlete and overall quarterback. I would pick him as my QB. Now compare to Gill, Gdowski, Taylor, Frazier...

Reply
James Barnett
0
James Barnett

If Crouch played for Osborne he'd have had even a better career. Not knocking Solich but it was clear the team fell off after Tom Os' departure.

Reply
Greg Muller
0
Greg Muller

I guess Tommy F, is assumed to be preferred choice over either Frost or Crouch?

Reply
Patrick Ryan
Patrick Ryan

These are impossible questions, but Turner Gill is my all time favorite. He changed the position at Nebraska, and had the ideal combination of elusiveness, toughness, leadership, and passing skills.