Do you plan on buying the new R.I.P ammo? Why?
USA Carry Asked by USA Carry
12/31/2014

Do you plan on buying the new R.I.P ammo? Why?

38%
Yes.

31

62%
No. WINNER

50

38%
Yes.

31 Comments
Kevin Yost
Kevin Yost

I carry an m9 loaded with +P hollowpoints, FMJ is for targets, I never want to worry about over penetration, the price will have to come down a bit, but I would love to have these bullets for carry.

Reply
Austin Schmit
Austin Schmit

I will once price drops. Would be nice to KNOW my small caliber, low round EDC weapon can get the job done in 1 shot. FTFs would be my biggest concern.

Reply
John Kirkpatrick
John Kirkpatrick

In order to test it's effectiveness. Appears that it may be a safer home defense ammo.

Reply
Robert Morin
Robert Morin

The point of home defense is to protect my family , if there is a better way to do it then why not .

Reply
Kenneth Ray Farrow
Kenneth Ray Farrow

If someone is going to try to hurt my family I want to be to stop them immediately

Reply
Rick Wright
Rick Wright

I will buy it and test it to see how it performs at our facility.

Reply
Joey Sankows
Joey Sankows

To give it a try and, if it performs well, get more for my derensive ammo.

Reply
Paul Willard
Paul Willard

This stuff looks like it would get the job done in a hurry....

Reply
Visitor
Visitor

If it is tested to be effective, certainly.

Reply
James Allen Wyatt
James Allen Wyatt

Prudence dictates that one should be armed as well or better that our adversaries, be they foreigh or DEMESTIC, THE LATTER CURRENTLY THE MUCH GREATER THREAT.

Reply
Michael Lentini
Michael Lentini

Bigger wound chanel. More energy transfere.

Reply
Hoss Nelson
Hoss Nelson

Looked it to it and seen some testing. Current carry the 50gr liberty 9mm @2000fps after self testing. Not sure if I'll switch but will try it out.

Reply
Yellow Frog
Yellow Frog

My right to shoot once for total stoppage

Reply
Mike Bell
Mike Bell

its important to re-enforce muscle memmory

Reply
Wchristepher Batts
Wchristepher Batts

my personal protection, as well as the protection of my family IS my reason!

Reply
Eric Urso
Eric Urso

Because if it is someone I care about being attacked, I want the odds stacked in their favor as much as possible. we didn't go looking for trouble ,it came and found us...

Reply
Thomas Rogers
Thomas Rogers

if you have it in 40 & 44 mag ill buy them

Reply
Charles Conway
Charles Conway

I'd like to test fire them into ballistic gel under various conditions and with various guns to see if their claims are accurate. Actually use them against someone? Hell no!

Reply
Emil J Raffio
Emil J Raffio

Curiosity killed the cat. We will see!

Reply
Michael Sobczynski
Michael Sobczynski

When it comes to defense...Send only the Best!

Reply
Geoff VanSickle
Geoff VanSickle

.380 and 9mm have been considered in-adequate by many as stopping power. These will change that and allow me to carry a smaller firearm that still has one shot stopping power.

Reply
Clay Burtts
Clay Burtts

to try it , home defense

Reply
Michael Chupich
Michael Chupich

I would use them as the first two rounds in my home defense gun magazine. Even at $12 per round it would be better to have them and never need to use them.

Reply
Leland P. Riggs
Leland P. Riggs

If it stops an intruder with one shot, it lessens the intruders ability to inflict harm.

Reply
Dan Bostan
Dan Bostan

The ultimate round! 9mm bullet is more effective than a .45 round. Therefore shooting a 9mm handgun , with lower recoil and more bullets per magazine answers the need for ultimate protection

Reply
Erik Pace Birkholz
Erik Pace Birkholz

IF I could afford it; I'd buy to test it 1st. A tech paradygm shift in ammo demands it IMHO. i.e. Mfgr claims 0 malfunction feed/fire/eject failures. I'd verify ballistics & accuracy up to 25+yds

Reply
Kevin Loberg
Kevin Loberg

from what I saw in the video....if this ammo works as intended it may very well be the last defensive rounds I will ever buy....that's if I can find some for dad my wife an myself.

Reply
Wayne Gotz II
Wayne Gotz II

looks like the best defense round available

Reply
Thomas Joy
Thomas Joy

Maximum efficiency without maximum penetration through the body cavity..

Reply
Joe Folsom
Joe Folsom

Think the rounds are awesome.

Reply

62%
No.

50 Comments
Joe Sobotka
Joe Sobotka

First off, god forbid, if I ever had to shoot someone and got into a civil case the other sides attorney would have a field day with the R.I.P bullet especially the way they're promoting it. Second my

Reply
David Neckolaishen
David Neckolaishen

Too expensive. Probably be a problem in a Court Case!!

Reply
Gary Darrar
Gary Darrar

http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2014/02/daniel-zimmerman/g2-researchs-rip-ammo-ballistic-testing-phase-one/

Reply
Steve Harmon
Steve Harmon

00 buck is all I need.

Reply
Bob Johnson
Bob Johnson

Reviews don't justify price-

Reply
Pete Phillips
Pete Phillips

My ammo is fine Do not have to have the latest and greatest .

Reply
Tyrone Turner
Tyrone Turner

The way the court system and anti gun thinking is today, it could be looked at as "NAME was wanting the most devastating wound he could inflict. Only intent was to kill." Seems overkill to me

Reply
Michael Minjack
Michael Minjack

Don't know a/thing about it !!!!

Reply
Dave Allen
Dave Allen

Over kill can turn against you in court

Reply
Danny Gholson
Danny Gholson

afraid it will damage my gun.

Reply
Rick Womack
Rick Womack

the cost is prohibitive

Reply
Dave Bentley
Dave Bentley

It's a gimmick. It also makes gun owners look like we're "blood thirsty." It's named "R.I.P." Seriously?

Reply
Jim Burns
Jim Burns

Unnecessary expense.

Reply
anthonyaumiller
anthonyaumiller

To expensive I think Gold Dot will work just as good

Reply
Norman Dufault
Norman Dufault

Sou.ds like it should be banned because it is just too lethal and too expensive. Will cause many law suits and problems for gu n owners.

Reply
Organic Democracy
Organic Democracy

I know what I need, what works to stop the threat, and my skill combined are most important elements.

Reply
Debbie Morrisset
Debbie Morrisset

THIS IS A SICK IDEA!

Reply
Dave Hagstrom
Dave Hagstrom

To much liability and not yet proven.

Reply
Orange Bird
Orange Bird

Overpriced and there is plenty of better proven product on the market for less.

Reply
Samuel A. Grim
Samuel A. Grim

At least not while it's $242 for a box of 20.

Reply
John Galtwell
John Galtwell

I've seen some ballistics gel tests, and I wasn't impressed enough to buy it at 50 cents a round, let alone twelve bucks

Reply
June Cannon
June Cannon

too much collateral damage away from intended impact targeted area

Reply
Robert Chapel
Robert Chapel

Who needs ammo that will kill everytime? I can understand military use but civilians do not need ammo with this capability. And to spend $12 a round is a bit costly to never use.

Reply
J.Ed Baker
J.Ed Baker

Product is over rated and the advertising hype is wrong for the current time.

Reply
Tom
Tom

The companies tests are bogus,yes they shoot thru barriers but they DO NOT shoot thru barriers into ballistic gelatin , not even denim.

Reply
Joe Dobson
Joe Dobson

Whats the purpose of having ammo such as this. Won't be long before it is outlawed anyway...

Reply
Michael Wickett
Michael Wickett

There are good companies that make good ammo out there. this just leaves too many questions for and I am a 45acp guy and for a shotgun there had been stuff like this for decades. GOD BLESS AMERICA

Reply
Marc Davids
Marc Davids

To expensive and a FMJ will do the same thing. its not necessary especially for that price.

Reply
PaladinFirearms
PaladinFirearms

The videos show it.passing.well through and beyond the 18 inch ballistic gelatin. I will shoot to stop thethreat. Not have the bullet pass through to an unintended target.

Reply
Joe DeSimone
Joe DeSimone

I knew immediately this round was a joke when their marketing videos showed a bunch of dudes firing full-auto pistols into ballistics gel rather than showing actual ballistics testing results.

Reply
Jim Lagnese
Jim Lagnese

Don't need it. If I needed something that destructive, I'll just use one of my rifles. $242 buys a lot of reloading supplies too.

Reply
Mark Hanson
Mark Hanson

I do like the advancement in technology, and i'm sure there's a nitch for this. For me, there's other effective ammunition on the market which costs much less.

Reply
tan leopard
tan leopard

It needs time in the field before I will trust it.

Reply
Harry Vohl
Harry Vohl

It's more destructive than necessary. To incapacitate is one thing, to butcher is another.

Reply
Mark Respass
Mark Respass

Current expanding hollow points are sufficient.

Reply
Walt Walters
Walt Walters

I see NO "normal" use for this type of bullet. It reminds me of "cop killers" and I think the company was irresponsible in even considering such a dangerous bullet. I guarantee criminals will love it.

Reply
Matt
Matt

Too expensive. Hornady xtp work just fine.

Reply
Glen Flint
Glen Flint

Too expensive.

Reply
Jeff Cavins
Jeff Cavins

Based on the test results on the Youtube channel Shootingthebull410. Ammo is overhyped

Reply
Ruben J Rodriguez
Ruben J Rodriguez

is very expensive. it sounds like over kill. probably you will be in trouble due to the premeditation and intent to kill.

Reply