Asked by
KTVZ
Should Oregon revisit its public indecency laws?
Yes
No
The word indecent is self explanatory! It's there for a reason and no one wants to see other peoples private parts! Keep it behind closed doors in your PRIVATE HOMES!
Reply
we were born without clothes as long as the person that is naked is not acting in a sexual way or being obscene about it then is should not be criminalized. It is an expression of one's self and should be protected under 1A
Reply
As long as they are not engaging in immoral activities then they should be able to wear what they want, even if they don't want to wear anything. I do believe that even a first time event of anything sexual in public should involve a serious sentence. Rights shouldn't be revoked because of feelings
Reply
Very few people look better without clothes, and I don't want to see it. However, based on history and human behavior, there is no better way to make it popular than to make it illegal. Alcohol prohibition and banning assault rifles are good examples.
Reply
As usual, people who most vocally proclaim their own freedoms are the first to object to freedom for others.
Reply
stricter
ReplyArouse or not they should be arrested for public indecency
ReplyDecency is important. Morals are important. Public nudity should never be allowed. It serves no benefits to society,
ReplyHow dare poeple not give a damn about kids. When I was a kid you would get cited or arrested for indecent exposure. Enough with this lunacy way of thinking, other people besides naked people have rights too you all.
ReplyI support self expression, but public nudity could create opportunities for perverts to harm others. I am especially concerned about children walking around nude with strangers nearby.
Reply