Do you think Medicare advantage is problematic to health systems?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
452 Votes

Do you think Medicare advantage is problematic to health systems?

Yes

3

No

5

Yes

2 Comments
Shelly Young
2
Shelly Young

Medicare Advantage is not Medicare. They are private plans run by corporations for the purpose of extracting as much money out of Medicar beneficiaries and the government as possible. It is private insurance and a Republican plan to destroy actual Medicare. It costs taxpayers a lot more than actual

Reply
Latterdaysaint
Latterdaysaint

They don't want to destroy it

Stang1960
0
Stang1960

The private insurance companies are the problem with medicals needs. My medical needs should be between me and my doctor not an insurance company approving or disapproving what my DOCTOR request for me for treatment.

Reply

No

4 Comments
Terry Whitted
3
Terry Whitted

No. St. CHARLES is problematic to seniors' health.

Reply
Sussie Due
Sussie Due

THATS for sure! I was told years ago that a monopoly is illegal in the USA but apparently St Charles found its way around that. They own every single hospital and most of the clinics here.

Claudia-Jerry Brown
2
Claudia-Jerry Brown

We are very satisfied with Pacific Source Medicare Advantage. Had a Medicare Supplement plan several yrs. ago and every year the cost went up according to age plus had to buy a separate RX plan. Very relieved to not have to shop for a very expensive alternative to Adva. Thank you Pacific Source.

Reply
Claudia-Jerry Brown
1
Claudia-Jerry Brown

We are very satisfied with Pacific Source Medicare Advantage. Had a Medicare Supplement plan several yrs. ago and every year the cost went up according to age plus had to buy a separate RX plan. Very relieved to not have to shop for a very expensive alternative to Adva. Thank you Pacific Source.

Reply
LESLIE Wayt
0
LESLIE Wayt

We need extra financial help as we get older. It's a fact of life and Healthcare systems need to change with it. Improve themselves for everyone involved not just a select few.

Reply