Asked by
ABC 17 News
663 Votes
Should Missouri ban enforcement of federal gun laws?
Yes. They infringe on my rights.
No. The law is the law.
Some law enforcement agencies have expressed concerns that the bill if approved would hurt their ability to do their jobs.
Some law enforcement agencies have expressed concerns that the bill if approved would hurt their ability to do their jobs.
Show Less
4
Comments
Mary Kaminski
Logic and common decency in keeping our community safe. Enough innocent children have died. Selfishness and ignorance dictate the foolish ban of this law. These ridiculous actions are an embarrassment.
Reply
Lynne Booth
No civilian should needs weapons that are designed to kill people. They should be outlawed everywhere. Missouri is no exception.
Reply
Letitia DenHartog
There is a reason for laws that are put in place by the federal government and the state shouldn't block those laws
Reply
Karen Voges Schenk
obviously you do note about gun owners. What if the government something you did recreationally?
The 2nd amendment is pretty clear
ReplyThe socialist form of government is getting ready to be crammed down our throats, there are shortages of goods and services, gun laws are some of the first things being talked about in the Biden regime, Biden the unifier is undoing everything that his predecessor accomplished, and alienating us.
ReplyI believe in our constitution. Our rights are violated on a regular basis. If the people don't act, we'll all be subjected to socialism/communism!
ReplyMissourians have a right to guns and the federal government should not get to override state laws
ReplyMy guns, my magazines, my right!
ReplyLets just have them take all of our rights away, one by one! (insert sarcasm here). if you vote NO you are severely blind to what is happening and you need to take a history lesson!
ReplyBecause the democrats are trying to sneak antigun laws in with the stimulus package!!!!
ReplyIt states clearly shall not be infringed. Any law they create to restrict ownership of arms of any kind is an infringement of the 2nd amendment no if and or buts about it. there are no loop holes in the constitution for creating laws that restrict your ability to own any you desire
ReplyI feel that if the 2nd amendment is judged and limited, we will go down the path the 1st has- we are judging what speech is and is not okay in public forums, large media is allowed to silence what they don't like, etc. Stop and reflect on how you feel about any and all freedoms. What will be next?
ReplyIf the federal government can't be depended upon to preserve constitutional rights, then let that responsibility fall upon the states.
ReplyI can literally go get an illegal gun on ten minutes if I wanted to. People have a right to legally defends themselves. Criminals don't care about your prohibition laws.
Replybecause federal gun laws and the creation of the ATF were/are direct violations of the spirit and letter of the law stated in the second amendment. To also include infringing on states rights which the federal government has systematically eroded since the conclusion of the civil war.
ReplyQuick, severe punishment except for those protecting their life, property, and that of innocent bystanders, while using a legally obtained/owned firearm.
ReplyWe have to many of rights taken away everyday.
ReplyStates have sovereign rights and able to make the laws that fit our communities. Citizens of CA, MA, NY, etc should not dictate what laws Missourians live by. Disarming law abiding citizens or making law-abiding citizens whom are not able to pay the federal tax rates bend to the favor of the elite.
ReplyIt is our constitutional right.
ReplyBecause I'm an American that has read and understands the Bill of Rights.
ReplyGun ownership is given in the constitution and it should not be infringed upon. You should take away the illegal guns from felons before you take away my rights. They lost their rights when they became felons.
ReplyIt is illegal, to ban a Constitutional Right !
Reply